Libertine Posted 9 July Posted 9 July (edited) 33 years old btw. At least it’s not a 3 year deal, are we learning?! Edited 9 July by Libertine 3
Popular Post Sankey93 Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July 1 year deal is sound! We’ve got to get a lot of players in and let’s be honest he’s better than Ayew and Daka 😂 should be good for league 1 surely 28
Popular Post DJW11 Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July The massive part is if he stays fit. If he stays fit then could be brilliant for us but that's a big IF with his injury record. 5
Popular Post Tomo260 Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July He's an ex Southampton player, of course we go for him! 3 11
LCFC1996 Posted 9 July Posted 9 July Article mentions 11 incomings if we can shift players and Vestergaard in discussions to terminate his contract
CosbehFox Posted 9 July Posted 9 July 7 minutes ago, Sankey93 said: 1 year deal is sound! We’ve got to get a lot of players in and let’s be honest he’s better than Ayew and Daka 😂 should be good for league 1 surely Ings is never fit 1
Popular Post Officer Doofy Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July More injuries than goals in the last 5 years. Just look at that recent scoring record 3 7
Sankey93 Posted 9 July Posted 9 July 1 minute ago, CosbehFox said: Ings is never fit 20 odd games last season ain’t to bad and we need 2/3 strikers so an experienced one in with 2 youngish ones is ok I’d think. We need a lot of players and some experience to mix it up. 3
Popular Post MGLCFC Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July 3 minutes ago, CosbehFox said: Ings is never fit Would still make him better than Ayew and Daka 2 3
moore_94 Posted 9 July Author Posted 9 July (edited) For some reason I thought he was quite injury prone - doesn’t look like he actually is Edited 9 July by moore_94 4
Popular Post davieG Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July Just now, Samilktray said: Just not very exciting is it You'll not get exciting incomings you'll have to settle for exciting outgoings. 19 8
CosbehFox Posted 9 July Posted 9 July 4 minutes ago, MGLCFC said: Would still make him better than Ayew and Daka It doesn’t cos he has a worse goal ratio per game than Ayew 🤣
moore_94 Posted 9 July Author Posted 9 July 1 minute ago, CosbehFox said: It doesn’t cos he has a worse goal ratio per game than Ayew 🤣 I think Ings is better minutes per goal though
RowlattsFox Posted 9 July Posted 9 July I mean, if you take our recent history out of the equation, a one year deal in league 1 one when we are in desperate need of a striker and one who can also hopefully help some promising youngsters, it's not a bad deal. However, we are scarred as a fanbase and jinxed as a club. ACL gone before the season starts. 3
Popular Post Wasyls Pec Deck Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July I’m going to buck the trend here and say this is worth a punt for a season. He’d have been an upgrade had we had him last season. We don’t have a first team striker and he’ll bag for fun in League One. 16
Popular Post woznotwos Posted 9 July Popular Post Posted 9 July Anyone else groan when they saw the headline? 8
James_lcfc Posted 9 July Posted 9 July 6 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said: Hasn't been prolific in the last 6 years. Not for me. Obviously you're right, but any striker who has been 'prolific' recently probably isn't going to fancy coming to us? ...when you consider we have no money or future prospects, I think we have to take what we can get! 2
Recommended Posts