Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, GrobyLCFC31 said:

If Sheff Weds had brought Chaplin,Burns,McCarthy, Watson and Cullen in I think we’d all be saying that’s a great league one window for them. 

It’s the PTSD from previous poor elder players bleeding the club dry in the last 3-4 years that makes everyone understandably nervous. 

 

So far we seem to have brought in good characters too which is critical in a season where we hope to throw in academy lads! 
 

I’m happy so far, need 3-4 more out minimum to really sanitise the club. 

We will have had a decent window if we sign a decent striker or 2.

 

Hopefully they're leaders and good characters, but Ayew and BDR would have been considered good characters at their previous clubs. 

 

If they don't start well then they'll all become bad characters very quickly on FT. 😂 

Edited by trooky
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Lets pretend it's only 15k a week.

 

It's over three times the annual League 1 salary... for a 31 year old with a terrible recent injury record. For three years.

Ok let's pretend that you are correct and You are right. While Leicester's average salary is roughly three times higher, their commercial value is over ten times greater than the majority of League One clubs. Annually, Leicester pulls in between £33 million and £35 million in commercial revenue, whereas most League One clubs bring in just £2.5 million to £3 million.

 

 

Edited by Fox85
Posted
1 minute ago, Fox85 said:

Ok let's pretend that you are correct and You are right. While Leicester's average salary is roughly three times higher, their commercial value is over ten times greater than the majority of League One clubs. Annually, Leicester pulls in between £33 million and £35 million in commercial revenue, whereas most League One clubs bring in just £2.5 million to £3 million.

Our running cost excluding player salaries are too though.

Posted
9 hours ago, Dan said:

You'd moan if we signed Messi!!!

Good character though who cares if he’s on £400,000 a week it’s not our money can’t just play three u21s too many and reckless we’ve got to get promoted so a 6 year deal makes sense life expectancy is 82 so got a long way to go yet need some experience 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said:

Our running cost excluding player salaries are too though.

Our transfer sales for out going players are 15 times higher as well.

 

No comparing but it's like comparing Man Utd in the prem to Burnley. Thats why Man Utd etc can have high running costs to all the other teams 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Fox85 said:

Our transfer sales for out going players are 15 times higher as well.

 

No comparing but it's like comparing Man Utd in the prem to Burnley. Thats why Man Utd etc can have high running costs to all the other teams 

Man U are not staring administration in the face in the 3rd tier of English football.

 

I'm not against this as others. I would sooner have seen a shorter deal. However, it sounds like the actual fee is very low and if we go up this season then as still think the player provides value in the Championship. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

Man U are not staring administration in the face in the 3rd tier of English football.

 

I'm not against this as others. I would sooner have seen a shorter deal. However, it sounds like the actual fee is very low and if we go up this season then as still think the player provides value in the Championship. 

I think you need ti relax and chill with it all.

 

This squad is miles clear compared to 98% of the teams. We will go up this season easy and then the real work will begin next season.

 

Just get the popcorn ready and enjoy the ride 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Fox85 said:

I think you need ti relax and chill with it all.

 

This squad is miles clear compared to 98% of the teams. We will go up this season easy and then the real work will begin next season.

 

Just get the popcorn ready and enjoy the ride 

Oh ffs - Stephy is on the forums lads!

  • Haha 1
Posted

It's probably a year too long but we've only paid 75k for him. Always thought he was a pain in the arse when we played against him. I don't mind it tbh.

Posted
15 hours ago, Aleksz said:

Our first 75k fee of a transfer for our doomsayer fans to find a problem with :D

Seems like a time warp. 75k for a first team player 79/80 the last time we did that?

Posted
1 hour ago, trooky said:

We will have had a decent window if we sign a decent striker or 2.

 

Hopefully they're leaders and good characters, but Ayew and BDR would have been considered good characters at their previous clubs. 

 

If they don't start well then they'll all become bad characters very quickly on FT. 😂 

100% which is why it’s important to try and remain level headed when they sign. 
 

But I understand the irrational thinking because as a fanbase we can’t remember the last time where an older player turned out to be worthwhile -

The last few have been horrific deals, then you throw in the fact that people want the youth to play a massive part this season ( understandably) , the uncertainty is valid in my eyes- but the writing off a player before they’ve kicked a ball I can’t always understand. 

Also, we’re quick to point out the cons of signings when they get linked/sign, Wes Burns has a lot of pros too and I think he’ll be good for us this year, whether he’ll be able to do it if we get back up remains to be seen 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, GrobyLCFC31 said:

If Sheff Weds had brought Chaplin,Burns,McCarthy, Watson and Cullen in I think we’d all be saying that’s a great league one window for them. 

It’s the PTSD from previous poor elder players bleeding the club dry in the last 3-4 years that makes everyone understandably nervous. 

 

So far we seem to have brought in good characters too which is critical in a season where we hope to throw in academy lads! 
 

I’m happy so far, need 3-4 more out minimum to really sanitise the club. 

Consider the players (and wages) we've got rid of too. I think it's been fine so far. Only thing I would have really liked is someone guaranteed 15+ goals (last time we had Fryatt for that) but as long as all positions chip in I think we'll be fine. I am optimistic going into this season.

Posted

Could be an exceptional player for us in League One. Yes I get it's a long contract for a player of his age, but we need promotion and he'll help us achieve it.

Posted
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

Decent player for this season. 

 

Awful signing for 3 years. 

 

Nail on the head.

 

To me these signings all suggest they know it's win or bust in terms of promotion this season. It's a kick it down the road mentality that we have seen too many times. All be it, not as severe as the approach under Enzo which was unbelievably destructive looking back. 

 

We are still operating just to keep a manager we think is too good for us happy. Then we can't sustain it and end up pissing him off. 

Posted
Just now, Gamble92 said:

Nail on the head.

 

To me these signings all suggest they know it's win or bust in terms of promotion this season. It's a kick it down the road mentality that we have seen too many times. All be it, not as severe as the approach under Enzo which was unbelievably destructive looking back. 

 

We are still operating just to keep a manager we think is too good for us happy. Then we can't sustain it and end up pissing him off. 

It is win or bust this season, that's the point. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Tommy G said:

It is win or bust this season, that's the point. 

They had that approach to the Championship season under Enzo and it resulted in League One. 

 

I'm not saying it's not that but there are surely ways in which we can avoid signings like this and still go up. 

 

Let's hope they have finally got it right. 

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

Jesus. 

 

How have we been in this mess for years now and people still think the transfer fees are the problem. 

 

We've just signed a contract with Burns guaranteeing him over £2m and tieing him to our weekly wage bill for 3 years. 

 

He's a 32 year old man that isn't a particularly stand out player in the league above us, that we're looking to get back to, who has a poor injury record and will be 35 by the time the contract expires. 

 

Wes Burns as a player for this season? Yeah alright, not bad, especially with Chaplin here too. 

 

But this actual deal? It's just more honking, short sighted business.

 

It a bit of a circular argument, but 15k a week is fine for a backup player in the Championship, so if he gets us up this season and plays a bit part role for 2 years while being a good leader in the squad he will be fine.  if he doesn't get us up this season, he will be good next season as well.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...