tylesta Posted 5 September Posted 5 September Just now, Pliskin said: I don’t get bringing Burns in, he’s garbage. Howell was brilliant last week…. And I so disagree with Thomas starting again when we’ve got two competent comfortably CB’s on the bench. Should be strong enough to win, I just don’t want to see us end up 2-0 down because we’ve ****ed up at the back when it could potentially be avoided. Howells fitness seems a bit of a worry, he was blowing on tusday night great option 9ff the bench 1
Popular Post FoxesFourLife Posted 5 September Popular Post Posted 5 September (edited) Substitutes: 21. Franco Ravizzoli 32. Olabade Aluko 16. Warren O’Hora 27. Kamari Doyle 20. Harry Howell 23. Tommy Watson 9. Admir Bristrić Very strong bench that Edited 5 September by FoxesFourLife 4 2
CrazyKopCorner Posted 5 September Posted 5 September I accept Thomas starting at centre back as we've had 2 clean sheets. But due to his significant limitations he's an obvious weakness who will be targeted BDCR and Burns have done nothing to warrant starting places Dreadful as usual. 2
Popular Post Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 5 September Popular Post Posted 5 September Cullen is going to be a real white elephant isn't he, already surplus to requirements, only got 7 subs and we're pretty well stocked where he plays. Wouldn't have Monty Burns starting over Howell (or even Watson) but pleased to see the academy 4 haven't been swapped out. We really should be winning this. 5
Stevosevic Posted 5 September Posted 5 September Bobby…of course. No Cullen at all is good. Thomas keeping out actual CBs now.
coolhandfox Posted 5 September Posted 5 September People need to win the shirt. It healthy to have competition for places rather than Ayew walking around and playing the next week. 3
TheGoldenGod Posted 5 September Posted 5 September 1 minute ago, PaulW said: You've seen him training and assessed his fitness then? What sort of argument is that? Anyone not playing in the 11 is unfit and not good in training? Certainly cant get "match fit" if you dont play...that's a guarantee.
Popular Post CrazyKopCorner Posted 5 September Popular Post Posted 5 September The fact Reid been utter shite in all games and missed sitters in several does not mean he's likely to score today. It means he's likely to miss more chances 4 1 1
Pliskin Posted 5 September Posted 5 September 1 minute ago, tylesta said: Howells fitness seems a bit of a worry, he was blowing on tusday night great option 9ff the bench Was he? I thought he was fine, Burns looked to be blowing after ten minutes!!!!
MonarchFox Posted 5 September Posted 5 September 1 minute ago, tylesta said: Howells fitness seems a bit of a worry, he was blowing on tusday night great option 9ff the bench Both him and Alves were done after 60mins but had great first halves. He's got options to constantly rotate these wingers so I reckon the starting 2 will change every match 1
The Doctor Posted 5 September Posted 5 September 1 minute ago, PaulW said: You've seen him training and assessed his fitness then? they're midway through the season in Finland, he should be the most match fit of the entire squad 1
Ryy Posted 5 September Author Posted 5 September 3 minutes ago, CrazyKopCorner said: I accept Thomas starting at centre back as we've had 2 clean sheets. But due to his significant limitations he's an obvious weakness who will be targeted BDCR and Burns have done nothing to warrant starting places Dreadful as usual. This 1
brookfox Posted 5 September Posted 5 September All in I’ve no real complaints. Thomas has done very well at CB. One of the wingers needed a rest so I’m glad it wasn’t Alves. Bobby starting at 10 makes the Cullen signing look odd but with Chaplin unfit he’s not the worst option there. That team and bench looks strong to me.
ALC Fox Posted 5 September Posted 5 September (edited) No Kangasniemi is odd. This'll be the game Doyle shows he can replace BDCR as the preferred 10 once he comes off the bench surely. O'Hora for Thomas also. Edited 5 September by ALC Fox 4
Rubbersoul Posted 5 September Posted 5 September If you believe in that sort of thing Reid certainly has a fair amount of xG to cash in today
Scotch Posted 5 September Posted 5 September I mean, ofcourse having 2 new CB's we want to be seeing them start but this back 4 have also kept two clean sheets on the trot so I can also see the logic in keeping it as it is. 3
Popular Post coolhandfox Posted 5 September Popular Post Posted 5 September Kangasniemi and bristrić are long term projects. 6
Paninistickers Posted 5 September Posted 5 September No exaggeration, I find it upsetting to watch Bob. All 5ft 2 and five stone of him snarling as if he's some kind of enforcer, all the while being an easy a yard off the pace whilst huge lumbering useless centre halves glide past him like they are prime Bobby Moore
moore_94 Posted 5 September Posted 5 September Thomas will be starting at centre back until he messes up - which in my opinion is fair enough I can understand Burns starting as Howell clearly isn’t fit enough yet Fvck off Bob the Throb 1
Manley Farrington-Brown Posted 5 September Posted 5 September 1 minute ago, ALC Fox said: No Kangasniemi is odd. Not really. He's nineteen and has been in a new country for about a fortnight. No rush.
Cropwellfox Posted 5 September Posted 5 September (edited) 7 minutes ago, CrazyKopCorner said: I accept Thomas starting at centre back as we've had 2 clean sheets. But due to his significant limitations he's an obvious weakness who will be targeted BDCR and Burns have done nothing to warrant starting places Dreadful as usual. 100% Watch us start like we did against Plymouth but this time concede one or two of the stupid chances we cough up and Reid run around a bit and miss a sitter before HT. Thomas has done OK in a couple of games but was bullied by Pepple when he came on, he’s not a CB, never will be and shouldn’t be playing there even after a couple of quite fortunate clean sheets. Edited 5 September by Cropwellfox 1
kingfox Posted 5 September Posted 5 September Let’s be honest, with the depth we now have, there’s going to be players missing out that may come as a surprise, that’s what you get for having seven subs instead of nine in League 1. Not surprised to see the same back four today, and I can see rotation on the wings being a common theme this season.
Swarles Barkley Posted 5 September Posted 5 September Need to see something from Burns today to warrant the signing. Bang average at best so far 1
lgfualol Posted 5 September Posted 5 September Russ, Burns isn’t going to be your best mate, so play someone who isn’t washed. Cheers.
CrazyKopCorner Posted 5 September Posted 5 September 2 minutes ago, Cropwellfox said: 100% Watch us start like we did against Plymouth but this time concede one or two of the stupid chances we cough up and Reid run around a bit and miss a sitter before HT. Thomas has done OK in a couple of games but was bullied by Pepple when he came on, he’s not a CB, never will be and shouldn’t be playing there even after a couple of quite fortunate clean sheets. Yes it irritates the **** out of me how slow we start We're usually carrying at least 2 players which doesn't help
Recommended Posts