Leicestershire County Cricket Club

[Corky]

Take the draw whatever, don't want any sort of repeat of last week.

[Guest Lako42]

Is the stream down? 

[Bert]

This is gonna be a draw. Even we can’t. 

[Voll Blau]

Hopefully we pick up a few wickets for the bonus points. Time for the bowlers to step up.

[Corky]

6 down now, a couple of bowling points taken.

[The People's Hero]

Rich Rae is so horrifically anti the county; I really don't enjoy his commentary. We are where we are in terms of our side and our standards but he can't resist putting the knife in.

[Stadt]

5 wickets for Wright 

[The People's Hero]

Leicestershire five-fer and all Rae can talk about is how great Stoneman is. Our own centurion (one of them), he's put the knife in to 5 or 6 times now (Swindells).

 

Such a negative guy and massively sucks up to the opposition and their commentators every time.

[HaroldBazBo]

Full bowling points which is a touch.

[The People's Hero]

Just now, HaroldBazBo said:

Full bowling points which is a touch.

Awesome. After the recent bowling performances etc; a real plus and something we hope to build upon.

[sm1]

10 wickets in under 38 overs, wow got to say I never saw that happening. Hopefully this will be the confidence booster the bowling attack needs.

[Guest Lako42]

I must be the only person who actually enjoys RR commentary and doesn't have an issue with it. 

 

He's knowledgeable and quite informative imo. 

[Guest Lako42]

Nice confidence booster for the bowlers ahead of what should be a big grudge match for us next. 

 

Leicestershire v the cheats

[The People's Hero]

1 minute ago, Lako42 said:

Nice confidence booster for the bowlers ahead of what should be a big grudge match for us next. 

 

Leicestershire v the cheats

I'm going to call it now that one of our players rightly says something and because its little Leicester, we get a points deduction, whilst the cheat got a couple of disciplinary points.

 

 

[Corky]

1 hour ago, The People's Hero said:

Leicestershire five-fer and all Rae can talk about is how great Stoneman is. Our own centurion (one of them), he's put the knife in to 5 or 6 times now (Swindells).

 

Such a negative guy and massively sucks up to the opposition and their commentators every time.

If he's sucking up to Surrey he could work for Sky.

[Mark 'expert' Lawrenson]

1 hour ago, The People's Hero said:

Leicestershire five-fer and all Rae can talk about is how great Stoneman is. Our own centurion (one of them), he's put the knife in to 5 or 6 times now (Swindells).

 

Such a negative guy and massively sucks up to the opposition and their commentators every time.

Can’t stand his lame commentary, Mulligan Avenue? Where the hell is that? I assume he meant Milligan Road 🙄

 

[HaroldBazBo]

I don’t mind RR’s commentary at all.

 

10 wickets was good but to be honest Surrey were chasing batting points.

[Guest Lako42]

51 minutes ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said:

Can’t stand his lame commentary, Mulligan Avenue? Where the hell is that? I assume he meant Milligan Road 🙄

 

Maybe listen to what he's saying next time? 

[Mark 'expert' Lawrenson]

1 hour ago, Lako42 said:

Maybe listen to what he's saying next time? 

Oooooo I’ve been told off. 
Ive listened to him quite a lot, and he talks a lot of 💩, his problem is he thinks he’s an expert on things he has little knowledge of.

That is a fact.

Edited 9 May 2021 by Mark 'expert' Lawrenson

[Guest Lako42]

9 minutes ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said:

Oooooo I’ve been told off. 
Ive listened to him quite a lot, and he talks a lot of 💩, his problem is he thinks he’s an expert on things he has little knowledge of.

That is a fact.

You haven't been told off and clearly we were talking about this specific part of his commentary, which he explained at the time. 

 

He doesn't talk shit, he commentates on a game that takes part over the entire day for 4 days in a row, not 90 minutes, so maybe cut him some slack? 

 

 

[Mark 'expert' Lawrenson]

3 minutes ago, Lako42 said:

You haven't been told off and clearly we were talking about this specific part of his commentary, which he explained at the time. 

 

He doesn't talk shit, he commentates on a game that takes part over the entire day for 4 days in a row, not 90 minutes, so maybe cut him some slack? 

 

 

Nope.

No slack from me.

 

Anyway, back to the cricket, the lads did well today and over the whole of the game.

The batting looks strong and the bowlers stuck at it and bowled out an extremely strong Surrey side.

Well done the 🦊🦊🦊

 

Edited 9 May 2021 by Mark 'expert' Lawrenson

[Cake]

I'm not keen on RR. He only only reads out selected tweets from his guardian reading chums, loads of really good tweets just slide by while he constantly refers to Brunty or his other favourites. 

 

It's commentary by numbers same stuff everyday. Read out the input from others on social media let's have a change. Let's be a bit more challenging, not interested in your jogging or your mates bloody dogs

Edited 9 May 2021 by Cake

[Guest Lako42]

2 minutes ago, Cake said:

I'm not keen on RR. He only only reads out selected tweete from his guardian reading chums, loads of really good tweets just slide by while he constantly refers to Brunty or his other favourites. 

 

It'd commentary by numbers same stuff everyday. Read out the input from others on social media let's have a change. 

What is wrong with reading the Guardian? 

[Cake]

12 minutes ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said:

Nope.

No slack from me.

 

Anyway, back to the cricket, the lads did well today and over the whole of the game.

The batting looks strong and the bowlers stuck at it and bowled out an extremely strong Surrey side.

Well done the 🦊🦊🦊

 

Yep good stuff. Keep it going this week

[Cake]

5 minutes ago, Lako42 said:

What is wrong with reading the Guardian? 

Nothing but I will make my own mind up. Don't need or want his opinion. When he discusses Rugby it even worse. Woeful. Can't believe how poor he is. 

 

Nothing personal. I'm sure he is a nice guy. Just lousy at commentry