Phunny (Funny) Photos / Pictures

[rico]

[ozleicester]

Technically it is... if your net worth was $50,000... but whatever

Edited 27 November 2019 by ozleicester

[David Guiza]

10 minutes ago, ozleicester said:

 

Technically it is... if your net worth was $50,000... but whatever

 

 

T'is the season of goodwill to all men (with restrictions) 

Edited 27 November 2019 by David Guiza

[MPH]

3 hours ago, rico said:

 

 

Diane Abbott?

[MPH]

2 hours ago, ozleicester said:

Technically it is... if your net worth was $50,000... but whatever

 

 

I don’t see how this is a funny photo?

 

[kingcarr21]

1 minute ago, MPH said:

 

 

I don’t see how this is a funny photo?

 

Clearly you have no sense of humor. It is absolutely hilarious 

[Suzie the Fox]

[urban.spaceman]

[urban.spaceman]

[davieG]

 

[Jattdogg]

5 minutes ago, davieG said:

 

Thats brilliant lol.

[urban.spaceman]

Current mood:

 

[cambridgefox]

23 hours ago, ozleicester said:

Technically it is... if your net worth was $50,000... but whatever

 

20 hours ago, MPH said:

 

 

I don’t see how this is a funny photo?

 

If you zoom in on his jacket pocket.Jabba the Hutt is peering out😂😂😂😂😂

 

[UpTheLeagueFox]

On 27/11/2019 at 13:01, rico said:

That is so, so wrong on several levels.

Feel bad that I laughed very hard at it !!

[Wolfox]

On 27/11/2019 at 13:01, rico said:

Trudeau is into darts?

[Parafox]

On 27/11/2019 at 13:55, David Guiza said:

 

 

T'is the season of goodwill to all men (with restrictions) 

The man's a rich, selfish **** who portrays a false generosity to disguise his selfishness and make people believe he's a benefactor to the poor. There are so many billionaires like him. They don't give away unless they can get something back.

[Parafox]

On 27/11/2019 at 16:26, MPH said:

 

 

I don’t see how this is a funny photo?

 

Oh dear. It's saying, if you earned a salary of 50,000 a year and you gave the equivalent percentage to his donation you'd be donating £45. 

[Strokes]

1 minute ago, Parafox said:

Oh dear. It's saying, if you earned a salary of 50,000 a year and you gave the equivalent percentage to his donation you'd be donating £45. 

But how is that funny?

[Parafox]

1 minute ago, Strokes said:

But how is that funny?

It's not necessarily funny as such. It's more a cynical take on the wealthiest man alive donating money to a charity yet being a total scrooge at the same time. I agree, it didn't make me laugh, but it did make me think. Actually makes me despise these super wealthy sorts even more.

[MPH]

1 hour ago, Parafox said:

Oh dear. It's saying, if you earned a salary of 50,000 a year and you gave the equivalent percentage to his donation you'd be donating £45. 

 

 

im aware of what it’s saying, but why is that funny?

[MPH]

1 hour ago, Parafox said:

It's not necessarily funny as such. It's more a cynical take on the wealthiest man alive donating money to a charity yet being a total scrooge at the same time. I agree, it didn't make me laugh, but it did make me think. Actually makes me despise these super wealthy sorts even more.

 

 

and this is exactly why it shouldn’t be in here. it brings about discussion that is out of the scope of the thread.

 

 

 

Personally i think giving away nearly £100m is something that should be acknowledged as a good thing, not criticized or mocked.

Edited 28 November 2019 by MPH

[Trav Le Bleu]

20 minutes ago, MPH said:

 

 

and this is exactly why it shouldn’t be in here. it brings about discussion that is out of the scope of the thread.

 

 

 

Personally i think giving away nearly £100m is something that should be acknowledged as a good thing, not criticized or mocked.

Hi Jeff!

[MPH]

21 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Hi Jeff!

 

 

just someone who thinks 100m is a lot of money..

 

 

He didn’t have to give anything

Edited 28 November 2019 by MPH

[Beliall]

Nice tax breaks for charitable donations too....

[urban.spaceman]

I remember hen this thread used to be for fun things.