andog Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 Well indeed he is favourite with the bookies, but from reading this in the hull local it seems he's not interested: http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Hull-City-Leicester-links-irritating-says-Pearson/story-13745098-detail/story.html
eaststandtom Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 he found being asked the question irritating as theyre preparing for a match. again he doesnt say he isnt interested.
Babylon Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 he found being asked the question irritating as theyre preparing for a match. again he doesnt say he isnt interested. This is what annoys me, if you're not interested and being asked about it is annoying then say "I'm going nowhere, I have a job to do here".
Kitchandro Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 This is what annoys me, if you're not interested and being asked about it is annoying then say "I'm going nowhere, I have a job to do here". I spoke too soon
whitlock Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 This is what annoys me, if you're not interested and being asked about it is annoying then say "I'm going nowhere, I have a job to do here". Maybe there is a reason he didn't say that....?
eaststandtom Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 This is what annoys me, if you're not interested and being asked about it is annoying then say "I'm going nowhere, I have a job to do here". precisely
accessory Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 Pearson doesn't seem the type of person who wants to revisit his old haunts. He's never done it as a player or a manager. I doubt he'd want the upheaval. I'd prefer MON or Hughes anyway, maybe even Dave Jones.
Babylon Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 Maybe there is a reason he didn't say that....? Probably out of respect for us, not burning your bridges, negotiating a new contract... could be many a reason. He and his blow dried shit hair can stay in Hull, in fact all the managers can **** off. Put Rudkin in charge, I don't give a shit anymore.
Filberts Treat Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 I posted on here yesterday saying it was Clark but now I'm hearing Pearson!!! Don't believe me though it's probably bs
FallenAngel Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 I've just heard that too actually, but they said it was mentioned on RL so i'm not overly confident it's true, i've been listening to the radio the past 10 mins to see if anything is mentioned
whoareyaaa Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 im sure this has been posted but it clearly rules Pearson and Clarke out the job. http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Hull-City-Leicester-links-irritating-says-Pearson/story-13745098-detail/story.html
Babylon Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 im sure this has been posted but it clearly rules Pearson and Clarke out the job. http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Hull-City-Leicester-links-irritating-says-Pearson/story-13745098-detail/story.html Here we go again... Until Pearson says "I'm not interested" he has not ruled himself out. The words being said have meanings, and it's not "I'm ruling myself out".
whoareyaaa Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 Here we go again... Until Pearson says "I'm not interested" he has not ruled himself out. The words being said have meanings, and it's not "I'm ruling myself out". He clearly states in those words that he doesnt want the job if you read it without goggles on.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 Not the name Thais want but the man we need... He most certainly is NOT.
Babylon Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 He clearly states in those words that he doesnt want the job if you read it without goggles on. No he doesn't. He had the opportunity to close the subject, without the need for an answer that can be interpreted different ways. He chose not to take it for whatever reason, only he knows the reason. I'm not saying he wants it, or us even interested. Just that it is in no way a clear "no".
RowlattsFox Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 I can't see why Pearson would leave Hull, just would seem a strange move. Keep seeing people say he doesn't like flair players, he has Robbie Brady playing for his Hull side. Not sure on the style he will bring but if you look at Hull this season, don't score many but don't get beat too often.
Thracian Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 That comment seems starkly clear to me. He's ruling out nothing and is getting irritated being pressed to talk about something he wants to remain private - not least because he might unwittingly make life awkward for himself. Had he wished to close the subject he could have said: "I'm aware of and flattered by Leicester's interest but have no wish to leave Hull and my only intention this season is to help them win promotion." "Can I make it any plainer? If not that's the end of the subject today, tomorrow and for the rest of the season..."
MrSpaM Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 Said at the end of the Boot Room today that Pearson has officially ruled himself out Case closed
Cecchini1976 Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 If this is true, he turned the job down or O'neill is the new boss. Know for a fact Pearson was in talks today
Father Ted Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 I really wouldn't use Stringer as a reliable source. He either makes stuff up or finds it on here.
nuttytimmy Posted 3 November 2011 Posted 3 November 2011 Said at the end of the Boot Room today that Pearson has officially ruled himself out Case closed Said at the end of Ballard's show that that speculation is purely that - speculation. Seems it could be Pearson after all (just as it could be Hughes, MON, Keane, Me, You or Princess Leia)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.