Stevosevic Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 Hope it's not Morgan and i'm not sure why we would love it. Hoping it's a player out of nowhere, but Percy is always spot on.
Craig Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 He says he can't give any details on the story we'll 'love' tonight, but goes on to say "Stories from tomorrow's #Leicester Mercury: #LCFC hopeful over bid for defender". That's some detail, and it's presumably about Morgan. Could be two different transfer stories then? Wishful thinkining. Edit - Changed 'desperate' to 'different'.
EnderbyFox Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 He says he can't give any details on the story we'll 'love' tonight, but goes on to say "Stories from tomorrow's #Leicester Mercury: #LCFC hopeful over bid for defender". That's some detail, and it's presumably about Morgan. Could be two desperate transfer stories then? Wishful thinking. Snodgrass??? Try as i might i cannot get in the slightest bit excited about acquiring a very average championship quality defender for 1m He's out of contract in 6 months, we can get him on a free then!
yorkie1999 Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 Gotta be Heskey as a defender!! or fryatt to replace kasper.
teblin Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 We know it is a defender Do we? He says he can't give any details on the news we'll love. And also there will be news on progress with a defender! Could it be heskey?
ibbosuk Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 Maybe its Sharpe? If its>> 1) = Sharp would be very good 2) = A bid for Nikica Jelavic would be out of this world. 3) If it's Wes Morgan A certain lTK "He won't be coming here" Person is in for some stick...
Stevosevic Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 Do we? He says he can't give any details on the news we'll love. And also there will be news on progress with a defender! Could it be heskey? Stories from tomorrow's #Leicester Mercury: #LCFC hopeful over bid for defender" I don't think there is news on two players tomorrow, although i may be wrong. EDIT: Now we know - One Player, A defender Mark Charlton @TheNewStatsman @StephenP1989 It's a defender In reply to Stephen Prior Hide conversation Stephen Prior @StephenP1989 @TheNewStatsman is it news on a defender AND a player on the back page? Or is the defender on the pack page? thanks #muchconfusion
Babylon Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 Can't see why we want Morgan, especially if SSL leaves as a result Maybe we are getting him because SSL still wants to leave!!!!!!!
Happy Fox Posted 26 January 2012 Author Posted 26 January 2012 It is Wes Morgan most likely seeing as we have bid £1m for him, no surprises
EnderbyFox Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 Looks like this @TheNewsStatsman has learnt something from Stringer. How to overhype a situation!
kingfox Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 Ah said it was Chester, then it says had to change the back of the paper you should like this story, so I thought it could be anybody. Will be Morgan now probably, or Sol Campbell.
stoatish Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 I seen Hobbs might have put in a transfer request on twitter, he could of got the wrong Hull defender?! Sounds like Twitter bull to me but thought I'd throw it into the mix anyway Some fans would love it
Callabinho Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 We need a defender, we currently have two fit defenders, why would Nigel sell SSL if we have only two defenders? Sol is away and Tunchev is constantly crocked! So what happens if SSL or Mills get injured??
Simmo86 Posted 26 January 2012 Posted 26 January 2012 We need a defender, we currently have two fit defenders, why would Nigel sell SSL if we have only two defenders? Sol is away and Tunchev is constantly crocked! So what happens if SSL or Mills get injured?? Sense! People seem to think we can be after multiple players at once!
Nick Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 It better be a big name or statsman will lose all credibility he might have had.............. sounds interesting - gut says Heskey as the word 'love' is being banded about.
Chap84 Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 We need a defender, we currently have two fit defenders, why would Nigel sell SSL if we have only two defenders? Sol is away and Tunchev is constantly crocked! So what happens if SSL or Mills get injured?? Use 1 of the young players we have sitting about? That's why we have a youth set-up is it not?
fox in the sox Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 He's probably just trying to sell papers. Why say anything at all if he can't actually reveal anything? I've nothing against Morgan but no LCFC fan would 'love' that news surely. Perhaps a Premier defender on loan?
Saxondale Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 He's already said the reason he can't reveal is because it break Rob Tanner's (the chief sport writer) word as he's obviously be given the information on the proviso it's not published until tomororow. We know it's a defender.
Ozwin Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 What happened to that guy who spent all his days on Twitter and posting it off as 'inside information' on here? Is he still around under a new name or something? Liamlcfc or something wasn't it?
Jace Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 Its Jack Hobbs he has put in a transfer request with Hull Pearson will know he is far more likely to get him than Chester now
Danno Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 What happened to that guy who spent all his days on Twitter and posting it off as 'inside information' on here? Is he still around under a new name or something? Liamlcfc or something wasn't it? Fell off a cliff, died on impact
HEGGSY Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 Its Jack Hobbs he has put in a transfer request with Hull Pearson will know he is far more likely to get him than Chester now Fryatt Next ?
Jace Posted 27 January 2012 Posted 27 January 2012 Fryatt Next ? Did you have a bad dream last night Heggsy?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.