Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
BMR

Marko Futacs

Recommended Posts

Guest Bilo
Posted

I didn't realise he was only 22, definitely one for the future as well.

Decent signing.

Posted

Wow his goal scoring record is gash. We'll have Babylon on here in a second telling us he's rubbish and unproven at this level. Lame signing if true. If he's young and hungry he should nip for a kebab and Futcas off!!

Posted

Wow his goal scoring record is gash. We'll have Babylon on here in a second telling us he's rubbish and unproven at this level. Lame signing if true. If he's young and hungry he should nip for a kebab and Futcas off!!

Have you considered he may be a Plan B? Or he has value to our other strikers in setting up chances or acting as a foil to move the opposing CBs to create space for our players to exploit just a thought.

Posted

Wow his goal scoring record is gash. We'll have Babylon on here in a second telling us he's rubbish and unproven at this level. Lame signing if true. If he's young and hungry he should nip for a kebab and Futcas off!!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted

Wow his goal scoring record is gash. We'll have Babylon on here in a second telling us he's rubbish and unproven at this level.

But we aren't spending three million quid on Futacs, we aren't expecting him to be our main goalscorer (Only for him to go on and score 9 league goals) and we aren't (I assume) paying him such an insane weekly wage...

Posted

Zzzzzzzzzzz? That'll be you when Futcas is on the pitch : )

To be honest I was only joshing - taking a stance from Babylons in the deceased Beckford thread.

I think, as long as he doesn't do a Sticks on us, he could be a useful option. Low wages I imagine too - which can only be good.

But this leaves us with striker issues. Lots to shoehorn in to a 2 or 3. Probably a bench player and worth the risk.

Posted

Mark_w. I agree with you entirely. But we don't buy forwards NOT to score. Can't imagine you'll be impressed if he chips in with 2 all season - should we even sign the guy.

Posted

Zzzzzzzzzzz? That'll be you when Futcas is on the pitch : )

To be honest I was only joshing - taking a stance from Babylons in the deceased Beckford thread.

I think, as long as he doesn't do a Sticks on us, he could be a useful option. Low wages I imagine too - which can only be good.

But this leaves us with striker issues. Lots to shoehorn in to a 2 or 3. Probably a bench player and worth the risk.

Hopper and Schlupp will be loaned.

Leaves Waggy,Vardy,Becks,Nuge and Futacs

Posted

Mark_w. I agree with you entirely. But we don't buy forwards NOT to score. Can't imagine you'll be impressed if he chips in with 2 all season - should we even sign the guy.

I was just saying that your point about Beckford wasn't valid. As for that situation it all depends on how often he plays, what sort of contribution he makes generally and how much potential he shows. if he scores 2 goals but gets 15 assists and we go on to win the League then I wont be complaining. You need to put things into perspective, we've got him on a free and probably as an option off the bench.

Posted

Don't think we've got him yet have we? And I do keep things in perspective. A few round here don't seem to.

On a free, low wages, he's worth a shout. Different option and someone perhaps Nugent, Beckord or Vardy could work well off. We'll see I guess.

Posted

:unsure:

Just wondered why you took something off wikipedia where I can literally go onto now and change it to say he's in talks with Chelsea for example.

And the fact we already know he's in talks with us.

:unsure:

Just wondered why you took something off wikipedia where I can literally go onto now and change it to say he's in talks with Chelsea for example.

And the fact we already know he's in talks with us.

I was contributing to the discussion? not a problem is it and no need for the arrogant response....i don't believe wikipedia but as i saidi was just contributing

Posted

I was contributing to the discussion? not a problem is it and no need for the arrogant response....i don't believe wikipedia but as i saidi was just contributing

Contributing what exactly? A load of old bollocks?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...