ealingfox Posted 15 May 2013 Posted 15 May 2013 Lord Sugar on Stringer - 'A complete waste of space' Nigel Pearson on Stringer - 'A minor irritant' Poor Ian Not really getting this love for Rebecca. Don't feel like she's contributed much to any of the tasks, can't process the idea that she might be wrong and is far too quick to put knives to throats in the Boardroom. Really annoys me.
StanSP Posted 16 May 2013 Posted 16 May 2013 Lord Sugar on Stringer - 'A complete waste of space' Nigel Pearson on Stringer - 'A minor irritant' Poor Ian Not really getting this love for Rebecca. Don't feel like she's contributed much to any of the tasks, can't process the idea that she might be wrong and is far too quick to put knives to throats in the Boardroom. Really annoys me. I haven't seen much love for Rebecca. As for the knives to throats in the boardroom, everyone is like that. That's not a unique trait Rebecca has. Natalie tried to death-stare Uzma out in the boardroom and coupled with her shrill, shrieking voice, it actually scared me a little .
anotherharboroughfox Posted 16 May 2013 Posted 16 May 2013 was Stringer the guy who bought a whole chicken for every one person or was that someone else?
wurmer Posted 17 May 2013 Posted 17 May 2013 Lord Sugar on Stringer - 'A complete waste of space' Nigel Pearson on Stringer - 'A minor irritant' Poor Ian Not really getting this love for Rebecca. Don't feel like she's contributed much to any of the tasks, can't process the idea that she might be wrong and is far too quick to put knives to throats in the Boardroom. Really annoys me. Coming from Pearson and Sugar? Hardly a damning indictment....
The Year Of The Fox Posted 17 May 2013 Author Posted 17 May 2013 I think the grey haired chap will be one to watch
StanSP Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 . She would get it to be honest. But her reputation has increased! http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/20/the-apprentice-luisa-zissman-sex-parties-orgies_n_3305391.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cuk%7Cdl3%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D180772#slide=more296731
MooseBreath Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 She is dog rough, looks more manly than your average man. Wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that she used to have a cock.
Kitchandro Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 She is dog rough, looks more manly than your average man. Wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that she used to have a cock. If it wasn't for her nose she'd be damn fine.
Saxondale Posted 21 May 2013 Posted 21 May 2013 I'd love to see all of their audition tapes. I wouldn't know whether to laugh or cry! They're all on the website.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 23 May 2013 Author Posted 23 May 2013 That bloke Myles seems so well spoken and is able to rise above the bickering due to being a bit older. Definite contender
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 23 May 2013 Posted 23 May 2013 Big fan of Jordan, got bags of time for someone that goes for it when the task results are announced. Leah is incredible, that Clough guy is a turd.
ealingfox Posted 24 May 2013 Posted 24 May 2013 Big fan of Jordan, got bags of time for someone that goes for it when the task results are announced. Leah is incredible, that Clough guy is a turd. I see what you mean and its nice to see a bit of pashun but I think Sugar was right to call him on it, looks pretty unprofessional...
Kitchandro Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 Im glad Zee went this week. Complete tosser. Did anyone watch You're Fired? The woman on the panel absolutely slaughtered him
Charl91 Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 Im glad Zee went this week. Complete tosser. Did anyone watch You're Fired? The woman on the panel absolutely slaughtered him He really was a tool. I'm also not one to say things lightly, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was something in their accusations of sexism. His decision to bring both Leah was dubious enough anyway (it was clearly just because they argued), but Natalie clearly didn't deserve to be there; even if she didn't do much (which was 'cus he wouldn't let her...), the mistakes the other two guys made lost them the task. Ulterior motives at work there, for sure.
Kitchandro Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 He really was a tool. I'm also not one to say things lightly, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was something in their accusations of sexism. His decision to bring both Leah was dubious enough anyway (it was clearly just because they argued), but Natalie clearly didn't deserve to be there; even if she didn't do much (which was 'cus he wouldn't let her...), the mistakes the other two guys made lost them the task. Ulterior motives at work there, for sure. He certainly put the final nail in his coffin with his boardroom choices. I can only think his reasoning (assuming he's not sexist) was that he knew Natalie was under pressure from previous weeks. We had a bit of a debate at my house about it; I wouldn't rule it out that he was sexist, but I don't think in a court of law there'd be enough evidence for it. At the end of the day he was rude to two women, whether that was because he just had a preconception they were competent because he hasn't worked with them much and that's how he is, or whether he thought he was superior because they were women I don't know. But his explanation wasn't convincing at all. Certainly he was extremely arrogant throughout (his speech about how he would be remembered in 200 years was embarrassing) and didn't seem a likeable guy. You can tell he just pissed people off and they didn't like working with him.
The Horse's Mouth Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 Crikey haven't seen this week's addition completely crossed my mind.
StanSP Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 Yep, that was one of the best You're Fired programmes seeing Zee get torn to shreds and not being able to back up his decisions. The best bit was the woman (what was her name?) asking why there are so many incidences about the sexist stuff and then Zee just saying it was 'coincidence'. That to me said it all about his actions really. He set himself up for a fall right from the beginning - saying he knew Dubai like the back of his hand and telling Leah to 'put the map away'. I was shocked at that. Firstly, it's always a bit of a suicide shot to say you know things off by heart and then consequently not deliver. You shouldn't give too much away! But then with arrogant individuals like Zee, they're so stubborn so they won't listen (to women!). The map thing shocked me the most though - they may not know Dubai like you do (although they probably know it better now!). One of the most deserving firings in a while. To bring Natalie back in to the boardroom was an amateur mistake - putting personal relationships (or lack of) ahead of working relationships. He couldn't bring himself to bring Kurt or Neil back in ahead of Leah and Natalie. Due to his thoughts about the female gender which were clear to see, he clearly thought he could overpower Leah and Natalie. Actually, another best bit on the You're Fired programme was his reason for not bringing Kurt back in, 'he could have got fired'. Bizarre . He actually put all 4 nails in to his own coffin, not just the final one!
SystonFox Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 Luisa has decent knockers though. Just seen a pic of her topless but her boat and voice I just cannot bear! Leah the doctor alllll day
Kitchandro Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 Luisa has decent knockers though. Just seen a pic of her topless but her boat and voice I just cannot bear! Leah the doctor alllll day If it wasn't for her jew nose she'd be super fit. I don't mind her voice, it just sounds stupid for a business woman.
SystonFox Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 She looks like a dog. I can't remember the breed but she really resembles a dog. One of them ones with flappy furry ears. A German schnitzel? Or something?
ScouseFox Posted 31 May 2013 Posted 31 May 2013 It's all about Natalie. Edit - and when she got feisty in the boardroom this week it was sensational.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.