Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
OxfordshireFox

This Contract Situation

Recommended Posts

Posted

I love Lloyd but he isn't worth a two year deal if we are going to the too flight.

We can't be sentimental with these contracts no matter how much we want to be.

 

Exactly he only warrants a one year contract for me to see whether he is good enough for prem football the same situation with Morgan.

Posted

I thought the club had handled this well, the option on wes, so we now have the summer to sort a longer deal if we wish, we all know Kasper will only sign if we go up.

Konch on a 1 year deal. works well either way, good enough at this level, back up if we go up, presume his wages won't change to much.

However 1 year for dyer, this I find odd, he's found the form of his life, surely 2 years minimum, if we go up his pace can still be and asset even if not a 1st choice, if we came straight back down, we have him to tear up the championship again.

I think the problem with contracts longer than one year is that, should we drop down to the Championship again in a year (in case we get promoted this season), many players, among them Dyer, would be on risky wages.

The danger is that relegated teams from the Premier League would have to achieve instant promotion again, otherwise they'd end up with an unsubstantial wage bill.

 

I guess this is more a case of the club being very cautious about financial implications in a worst-case scenario.

Posted

I think the problem with contracts longer than one year is that, should we drop down to the Championship again in a year (in case we get promoted this season), many players, among them Dyer, would be on risky wages.

The danger is that relegated teams from the Premier League would have to achieve instant promotion again, otherwise they'd end up with an unsubstantial wage bill.

 

I guess this is more a case of the club being very cautious about financial implications in a worst-case scenario.

Wouldn't that be easily covered by a relegation clause = wage cut?

Posted

I think the problem with contracts longer than one year is that, should we drop down to the Championship again in a year (in case we get promoted this season), many players, among them Dyer, would be on risky wages.

The danger is that relegated teams from the Premier League would have to achieve instant promotion again, otherwise they'd end up with an unsubstantial wage bill.

I guess this is more a case of the club being very cautious about financial implications in a worst-case scenario.

It's tricky don't get me wrong, but surely if dyer signs now he's not really gonna be on premiership money, I think signing Kasper in the summer on the money he may want may cause more of a problem if we then came down, because without a clause to reduce his wage we could be stuck with a keeper on long deal and big money.

He may afterall, not cut it in the top flight week in week out as a 1st choice.

the same as I would expect konch to be signing a halfway house sort of deal, sitting somewhere between a top flight wage and a good living at championship level.

Posted

I'm not sure about Konchesky at all. If we go up I think we're going to need a better left back. He'd be OK as cover but we can't pay his current wages for a back-up even in the top flight.

 

I'd give Dyer a year personally and as much as I like him, you do fear that if he loses his pace (and it's going to happen to an extent one day) he's going to be a liability.

 

I don't think he'll turn down a year if it really comes to it.

Posted

Lloyd would easily get a two year contract elsewhere ..... I just can't see the problem with giving him one here ... he'\s one of our best players - so even with an influx of better players if we go up he'd still feature at some level for those two years.

 

He's not going to lose his pace overnight - surely two years wouldn't be a risk.

Posted

I love Lloyd but he isn't worth a two year deal if we are going to the top flight.

We can't be sentimental with these contracts no matter how much we want to be.

 

Usually I'd agree but this is Lloyd so all rationality is out the window. I'd offer him a ten year contract.

Posted

I'd give Dyer 2 years.

People say his pace is his best asset = very true. People say once he loses it the main attacking threat of his game will be gone = sadly this is true again. But I think he'd move out of the starting 11 if we went up and would be used as an impact sub - much the same as Phillips is now - to change a game when we need him too. He'd easily have enough of his blistering pace for 2 years in that role with starts occasionally. In the championship he would be a safe, solid starter for a few more years as well. It's not about being sentimental because we could offer him a 2 year deal. Realistically he IS going to lose his pace, but he is comfortably the fastest in the team which is an indication his will be very fast for years to come. A 2 year deal takes him to 33 which would be the right time to move on for dyer. But a 32 year old dyer - easily capable of terrorising defences. Can people really see his pace disappearing in a matter of 1 year? Injury will be the only thing that forces it on him.

Good news on Konchesky. Good starter in the championship and solid back up in the premiership if nothing else for his experience. Hopefully he has taken a decent pay cut. If yes I like his loyalty and commitment to the club.

Posted

Konchesky does have a lot of Premier League experience which could be useful in the squad. Certainly a capable back-up and worth another year I reckon.

 

Lloyd- well, again one year is ok, can see why he wants two but start with one and take it from there.

Posted

hearing from italy ac milan will bid for kasper after this week dont know if he go 

your hearing is incredible. are you superman?

Posted

need a keeper there keepers now our get on a bit kasper would be a good fit

Gabriel is 21 and Marco Amelia is 31, hardly getting on a bit. They also have Abbiati til the end of the season, then his contract runs out. Doubt they'd buy him in Jan. If there's any truth in it I would have thought they'd just get him in on a pre-contract

Posted

Why wouldn't some people want Dyer to be given a 2 year contract.

 

That's just about right in my opinion, he of all players deserves a shot in the Prem, 1 or 2 years it doesn't matter, we need to get him tied down, instead of pissing about, I'd hate to lose him, even though he probably won't play week in week out if we get promoted.

Posted

konch will be good back in the PL, wont be starting week in week out

 

Dyer, Id offer a 1 yr deal with an option to earn a second one based on appearance, assists, goals etc

Posted

I cannot see why AC Milan would bid any money now when they don't really need him until the summer.

 

Would people take £3.5mil for him in this window? It'd be a good financial move but I suppose it'd be a lot down to how much faith you have in a replacement keeper (Hennessey for example) to maintain a similar level of performance.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...