foxoffderby Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Just seen the uncut version its Tom Hopper who makes the slit eye comment.
stripeyfox Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 the language and behaviour is unsavoury but they haven't killed anyone and two of them havent done anything illegal, so stop going on like they raped a nun! forum full of idiot kids Most people, including myself (a grown up) are calling only for the three players to be sacked, which is a perfectly proportional reaction to a significant breach of discipline and conduct whilst on company business.
ROB-THE-BLUE Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Just seen the uncut version its Tom Hopper who makes the slit eye comment. You got a link?
VLC86 Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Just seen the uncut version its Tom Hopper who makes the slit eye comment. Shock horror
Finnegan Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 You got a link? If he does I would strongly suggest he keeps it to himself and does not post it here. I believe Unabomber is currently serving a month long ban for that.
foxoffderby Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 You got a link? not allowed to post it on here a friend sent it to my phone.
SecretPro Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Wow. I never realised there were so many nobheads on foxestalk. Anyone who can't see a problem here and who isn't calling for a sacking needs to have a look at themselves. This 'lads doing what lads do' attitude is ridiculous. Similarly there are some oldheads on here who I usually have a lot of respect for who seem to think being a prostitute means you are fair game for any type of behaviour/abuse. Prostitutes are still people and in most cases don't chose to be a prostitute at all. Love to see all you macho idiots on here if this was your daughter. Some real jokers on this thread.
thybluefox Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 If you use a bit of initiative, they are on Twitter.
stripeyfox Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Thread of the year so far? Never thought we'd be discussing "rimming" in the Leicester City section of this site...
Dynamogoon Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 You're right, they haven't killed anyone. And I appreciate that the orgy was probably consensual. However, they have racially abused people (of the same nationality as our owners) and attracted unwanted attention on our club. What's more, none of them are good enough to play for us anyway. Get rid, arrogant c*nts
Kitchandro Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Has it been proven they are prostitutes or are we all just assuming it because they're Thai?
Rincewind Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Of course, how lucky these girls are that they can choose to live in absolute poverty, or sell their bodies to arsehole Westeners and then put a little food on their families table. Christ alive. I wanted to put something similar. It amazes me the way some minds work.
Kitchandro Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 You're right, they haven't killed anyone. And I appreciate that the orgy was probably consensual. However, they have racially abused people (of the same nationality as our owners) and attracted unwanted attention on our club. What's more, none of them are good enough to play for us anyway. Get rid, arrogant c*nts One has.
Father Ted Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 You have absolutely zero knowledge what so ever. You come across as, at best, childish and naive and, at worst, thick. What, you've been on a holiday to Thailand and you now know everything about the sex trade? You have literally no statistics, evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, yet you feel qualified to discredit two of the most travelled adults in this community, based on what? I'd do yourself a favour and wind your neck in a little, personally. Calm down virgin.
Daz93 Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 the language and behaviour is unsavoury but they haven't killed anyone and two of them havent done anything illegal, so stop going on like they raped a nun! forum full of idiot kids When did I say they did anything illegal? You've just admitted yourself the language and behaviour is unsavoury, which is the main problem in all of this. They're on a good will trip to Thailand to promote the club. It's a business trip. You don't do this shit whilst on business. You don't call a Thai woman, whether they're a prostitute or not, a slit-eye because it's derogatory. The same as you don't call a black person a nigger. Do whatever you want with prostitues but don't video it and then send it to your mates whilst making them suck your arsehole and treating them like scum.
ROB-THE-BLUE Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 If you use a bit of initiative, they are on Twitter. I've seen the 15 and 30 second ones on twitter but neither of those covers the 'slit-eye' bit. I saw the blurred of that on the Mirror website
Uncle Monty Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 The video is not really something one would want to save for the family albumn to show your grandkids so why make it? If a mate showed me a similar one of his exploits I would worry about him. Mainly because most of my mates are over 45. "Lynn, they're 'sex' people!"
Babylon Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 They're on a good will trip to Thailand to promote the club. It's a business trip. Is it though? Or are the owners just giving people a free holiday. I've not seen press about them doing functions for photoshoots etc other than one shot when they first arrived. Not that it excuses the behaviour anyway.
Bettsj2 Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 My point was from a HR procedural point I see no risk in instant dismissal on the grounds of gross misconduct. Whilst representing the club on a trip abroad videoing yourself with 2 naked mates, conducting sexual acts, whilst insulting the ethnicity of your sexual partners in the country of your business owners, then sending it to your mates, is as Gross Misconduct as you can get!!! In fact if the HR people ever wanted to exemplify Gross Misconduct this video would be an excellent training aid. Whilst I've been in many employment tribunals and they are ridiculously in favour of the employee, with the judge seeming to find ways to favour them .... I cannot see any possible reason to not instantly dismiss them and grant them an appeal. Follow the ACAS guidelines for good measure and they literally cannot go wrong. You cant grant them an appeal without a hearing first. And you cant have a hearing if you've already sacked them.
stripeyfox Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 When did I say they did anything illegal? You've just admitted yourself the language and behaviour is unsavoury, which is the main problem in all of this. They're on a good will trip to Thailand to promote the club. It's a business trip. You don't do this shit whilst on business. You don't call a Thai woman, whether they're a prostitute or not, a slit-eye because it's derogatory. The same as you don't call a black person a nigger. Do whatever you want with prostitues but don't video it and then send it to your mates whilst making them suck your arsehole and treating them like scum. This. I mean, Jesus Christ, it's not that hard to understand is it?
Daz93 Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Is it though? Or are the owners just giving people a free holiday. I've not seen press about them doing functions for photoshoots etc other than one shot when they first arrived. Not that it excuses the behaviour anyway. You've got a point, and I just assumed. There are pictures on the official site of them in Leicester kit posing with the owners and the King Power sponsor, so it would seem that way. Why would the owners treat players like Hopper, Smith and Pearson (who have contributed nothing this season) to a free holiday?
stripeyfox Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 Is it though? Or are the owners just giving people a free holiday. I've not seen press about them doing functions for photoshoots etc other than one shot when they first arrived. Not that it excuses the behaviour anyway. Doesn't matter what the purpose of the trip is. It is paid for by the employer. It is only for employees. That makes it a work trip. Which means you are, generally speaking, bound by the same code of conduct of behaviour as if you were at work.
Finnegan Posted 1 June 2015 Posted 1 June 2015 I'd make the three of them sit down and watch the video back with the girls parents, armed with complete translation and a blunt instrument of their choosing. See if they think it's acceptable behaviour then.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.