Bagworthblue Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 To be fair, add press duties too - though this is mainly as it is the perfect medium to promote how great he is or defend how bad he is
foxinsocks Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Hiddink is on the seniors tour. He can't be a long term solution. Clubs with stability do better over the long term coz management changes dilute the returns from investments in players. In uk we have loads of tv money...and some of the best players in the world as a result... but still we haven't dot the best teams in europe.... we keep changing managers! We should appoint for the long term. The best manager .... adding value to the ability of his squad, apart from Jose, is Koeman.. and he has years ahead of him. We should go get him.
Richard Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Would rather have someone younger, hungrier and more progressive who can build something
Tuna Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Would rather have someone younger, hungrier and more progressive who can build something Nigel Pearson !?
TheReaper87 Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Would rather have someone younger, hungrier and more progressive who can build something Who you thinking of?
lestajigs Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Who you thinking of? That's it who the hell is there?? This is gonna cost us this
Bagworthblue Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Hiddink is on the seniors tour. He can't be a long term solution. Clubs with stability do better over the long term coz management changes dilute the returns from investments in players. In uk we have loads of tv money...and some of the best players in the world as a result... but still we haven't dot the best teams in europe.... we keep changing managers! We should appoint for the long term. The best manager .... adding value to the ability of his squad, apart from Jose, is Koeman.. and he has years ahead of him. We should go get him. I agree entirely that we should look to do this next year but appoint Hoodwink for now and spend the year lining the right person up.... or on a 2 year basis gradually wean Shakespeare into the role with HIddink handing over gradually in a succession management plan
st albans fox Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Is there any evidence that shakey is anything other than Nigel's mate? Whenever I see them speaking pitch side, shakey never seems to have much input to the conversation. When Nigel was sitting in the stand, KP seemed to be more involved in getting the message across than shakey.
Richard Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Who was Nigel Pearson? Who was Eddie Howe? Who was Mauricio Pochettino? There's a couple of (b?)illionaire businessmen making this decision, let's hope they make the right one
CosbehFox Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Interested to read Jason Burt of the Telegraph on Twitter who was good friends of Hiddink whilst at Chelsea. He states that he's lost the drive and desire.
lestajigs Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 just get Neil Lennon in!!!!!!!!!!!!! noooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Doctor Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 just get Neil Lennon in!!!!!!!!!!!!! I too am bored of being out of league one.
Hollism Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Interested to read Jason Burt of the Telegraph on Twitter who was good friends of Hiddink whilst at Chelsea. He states that he's lost the drive and desire. Does he mean since then? All the players were begging him to stay when he was there.
Guest MattP Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 Does he mean since then? All the players were begging him to stay when he was there. You have to seriously wonder why he didn't take it if that was the case. Doesn't make much sense. He was managing Turkey a few months later, surely nowhere near as attractive as Chelsea.
Bettsj2 Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 You have to seriously wonder why he didn't take it if that was the case. Doesn't make much sense. He was managing Turkey a few months later, surely nowhere near as attractive as Chelsea. Didnt want to be surrounded by a bunch of rentboys?
The Doctor Posted 3 July 2015 Posted 3 July 2015 You have to seriously wonder why he didn't take it if that was the case. Doesn't make much sense. He was managing Turkey a few months later, surely nowhere near as attractive as Chelsea. Didn't want to work with abramovich? I imagine he's quite a stressful person to work for.
EnglishOxide Posted 4 July 2015 Posted 4 July 2015 I genuinely cannot believe they would sack Pearson because of his conduct and replace him with Lennon. It would literally be unbelievable.
Hack Posted 4 July 2015 Posted 4 July 2015 I genuinely cannot believe they would sack Pearson because of his conduct and replace him with Lennon. It would literally be unbelievable. I was as big a fan of Nigel as anyone, but seriously you and all have to move on it has happened and probably for a very good reason that we will probably never know. So let's get on with where the club is heading. I am sure it will work out. Life does go on after big decisions.
The_77 Posted 4 July 2015 Posted 4 July 2015 I was as big a fan of Nigel as anyone, but seriously you and all have to move on it has happened and probably for a very good reason that we will probably never know. So let's get on with where the club is heading. I am sure it will work out. Life does go on after big decisions.I don't think that's Oxide's point. If Nige's conduct were the reason he was sacked, it wouldn't make much sense to replace him with Lennon, who's no saint on the touchline.
Dan Posted 4 July 2015 Posted 4 July 2015 Unless your name is Jose Mourinho, Chelsea is a bit of a poisoned chalice. He certainly hasn't covered himself in any glory post-Chelsea though.
Ian S Posted 4 July 2015 Posted 4 July 2015 just get Neil Lennon in!!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep taking the pills!
inckley fox Posted 4 July 2015 Posted 4 July 2015 I was as big a fan of Nigel as anyone, but seriously you and all have to move on it has happened and probably for a very good reason that we will probably never know. So let's get on with where the club is heading. I am sure it will work out. Life does go on after big decisions. I'm not sure why some people can't distinguish between disputing a board decision about Nigel Pearson and getting behind the new manager. You can disagree with the sacking, think it was one of the dumbest, silliest decisions ever and still fall in love with whoever comes next. Just because you recognise the risks associated with Pearson's sacking doesn't mean you don't hope it all works out beautifully.
Hack Posted 4 July 2015 Posted 4 July 2015 I'm not sure why some people can't distinguish between disputing a board decision about Nigel Pearson and getting behind the new manager. You can disagree with the sacking, think it was one of the dumbest, silliest decisions ever and still fall in love with whoever comes next. Just because you recognise the risks associated with Pearson's sacking doesn't mean you don't hope it all works out beautifully. My point is how can people not understand that the board did not make this decision to hurt the club, the players, the fans o their own interest. It must of been something very concerning to sack a successful and popular manager. Do people really think this would of been done if there were alternative actions? Why in gods name would they have done this if it could have been avoided. So saying Dumbest, stupidest etc is just completely naive and immature.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.