tom27111 Posted 6 January 2017 Posted 6 January 2017 56 minutes ago, Spiritwalker said: I've always thought DD had that sort of boy next door look, but he is smokiiiin. For some reason, as I read this, I just spat my beet out! He's got a boy band look going on right there
sylofox Posted 6 January 2017 Posted 6 January 2017 I would think as Frankie Wortho shagged half of Leicestershire this don't need asking.
VLC86 Posted 6 January 2017 Posted 6 January 2017 1 hour ago, Aus Fox said: Great thread, but did we need the (no homo) in the title? Does that mean if you happen to be a homosexual Leicester supporter you cannot comment? Or you just confirming to all the people that don't know you, and don't care about your sexual preference that your not a homosexual? Anyway for what it's worth Muzzy has to be in with a shout. It's a joke saying that laddzzzzzzzz use, relax.
The whole world smiles Posted 6 January 2017 Posted 6 January 2017 Not a player but my step mum was absolutely wet for Paulo Sousa. Would not shut up about him.
VLC86 Posted 6 January 2017 Posted 6 January 2017 1 minute ago, The whole world smiles said: Not a player but my step mum was absolutely wet for Paulo Sousa. Would not shut up about him. No need to pretend pal, this thread is about getting it all out in the open. Lets face it you don't have to be gay to slip into a daydream about Paulo taking you out for a fish supper.
The whole world smiles Posted 6 January 2017 Posted 6 January 2017 6 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: No need to pretend pal, this thread is about getting it all out in the open. Lets face it you don't have to be gay to slip into a daydream about Paulo taking you out for a fish supper. Haha OK I'll admit it I don't even have a stepmum.
Tanya Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 Riyad Mahrez and Kasper Schmeichel. Riyad has the most beautiful smile in the world and his beard is rocking and Kasper is all chiseled with broad shoulders....
Raj Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 https://goo.gl/images/arWtsg How'd do you bloody post images via phone!!!! It's Riyad...hes gorgeous!!!
ozleicester Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 Mods can you look at the topic title... Best looking City player (no homo) unnecessary and offensive... also, has the report button disappeared?
stripeyfox Posted 7 January 2017 Author Posted 7 January 2017 10 hours ago, Aus Fox said: Great thread, but did we need the (no homo) in the title? Does that mean if you happen to be a homosexual Leicester supporter you cannot comment? Or you just confirming to all the people that don't know you, and don't care about your sexual preference that your not a homosexual? Anyway for what it's worth Muzzy has to be in with a shout. No offence intended whatsoever. I've seen the phrase use on here quite a bit and always seems to be in the context of being tongue in cheek. Like asking for a lift share to a game but "no homo". I'm pretty liberal about all kind of things and would never set out to alienate anybody or any group so apologies if this has offended you or anybody else. For what it's worth I think it is entirely healthy for a "straight" guy to be able to "appreciate" how handsome another man may be. I'd leave my wife for David Beckham.....
stripeyfox Posted 7 January 2017 Author Posted 7 January 2017 3 minutes ago, ozleicester said: Mods can you look at the topic title... Best looking City player (no homo) unnecessary and offensive... also, has the report button disappeared? I would change it if I could, but don't seem to be able to? Was not meant to offend in any way, so apologies for that.
ozleicester Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 1 minute ago, stripeyfox said: I would change it if I could, but don't seem to be able to? Was not meant to offend in any way, so apologies for that. no worries
HighPeakFox Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 Re 'no homo' - Who is offended, by the way, and on behalf of whom? I mean, I'm not in on the joke, it strikes me as a bit crass, but if you're getting offended by that, good luck when you bump into something that is actually offensive.
MC Prussian Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 From the current squad, surely it's got to be Hernandez. Would have no troubles entering the modeling world now or once he's hanging up his football boots.
stripeyfox Posted 7 January 2017 Author Posted 7 January 2017 No homo is a phrase used as slang at the end of a sentence to assert the statement spoken by the speaker had no intentional homosexual implications.[1] The phrase is “added to a statement in order to rid them of a possible homosexual double-entendre”.[1] Most commonly used by males, it is, according to Associate Professor James Joseph Dean of Sonoma State University “a way of flagging one’s straight status and claiming its privilege”.[2] It is a form of “identity construction in discourse via societal legitimization”[3] for heterosexual males and a mechanism for which to distance oneself from any notion of homosexual intent.[3] As Joshua R. Brown states in the "Journal of Homosexuality", “increasing prevalence in mainstream speech has caused critics to deplore no homo as outright homophobia”. This is kind of the context which I thought the phrase was used - certainly no homophobia implied by me. I think it is more or less appropriate given the context of the discussion but if people have found it offensive then, once again, I apologise.
ozleicester Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 8 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said: Re 'no homo' - Who is offended, by the way, and on behalf of whom? I mean, I'm not in on the joke, it strikes me as a bit crass, but if you're getting offended by that, good luck when you bump into something that is actually offensive. I am offended. The implication is, that to find them attractive in a sexual way is wrong. As for "actually" offensive, who the fvck do you think you are to decide what is and isnt offensive, perhaps you could put together a list for my future reference.
Vacamion Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 It is ridiculous and, dare I say it, a bit snowflakey, to assert that there was any homophobia in the original post. Quite the opposite, given that this thread is pretty much men drooling over other good looking men. And it's Gary Lineker when he was younger, in an England shirt, by the way...
ozleicester Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 1 minute ago, Vacamion said: It is ridiculous and, dare I say it, a bit snowflakey, to assert that there was any homophobia in the original post. Quite the opposite, given that this thread is pretty much men drooling over other good looking men. And it's Gary Lineker when he was younger, in an England shirt, by the way... I dont think there was an intent to offend, nevertheless it does, and as you see from the topic starter he can appreciate that and would change it if it were possible. I was not trying to make a big deal out of it, just requesting it be changed, it doesnt alter the intent and neednt affect anyone who wants to post in the topic.
Vacamion Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 4 minutes ago, ozleicester said: I am offended. The implication is, that to find them attractive in a sexual way is wrong. As for "actually" offensive, who the fvck do you think you are to decide what is and isnt offensive, perhaps you could put together a list for my future reference. Dearie me. Looking for hate where none exists.
ozleicester Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 1 minute ago, Vacamion said: Dearie me. Looking for hate where none exists. Quite the opposite infact
MC Prussian Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 Just now, ozleicester said: Quite the opposite infact "Where's the loove, the looove, the looove? Where's the loove, the love, the looove?"
Vacamion Posted 7 January 2017 Posted 7 January 2017 1 minute ago, ozleicester said: Quite the opposite infact Ok, sorry.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.