Gylfi Sigurdsson

[Nick]

21 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

Where did I quote I know everything? I simply stated we are not in for Gilfi.

maybe read the posts properly or have someone read them to you if your confused.

 

 

Yeah well STOP STATING stuff (and you call me thick) You wonder why you get grief  

 

All you have to say is that this is the case 'as far as you are aware' but you don't get to make statements of fact because you just don't fvcking know anything for sure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[foxes21]

2 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

But show me where and when I said I know everything? Your words not mine. 

To be fair you have made a few posts which come across as fact, which is probably what @foxoffderby is trying to say.

 

2 hours ago, themightyfin said:

Don't know where he's hearing this but I've said it once and I'll say it again we are not in for Gylfi

This post for example.

Surely there are too many variables in a transfer to make a strong assured post like this. Your contact might not know everything himself.

 

[Nick]

14 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said:

@themightyfin any info on this pal?

 

? 

[smudger63]

4 minutes ago, foxes21 said:

To be fair you have made a few posts which come across as fact, which is probably what @foxoffderby is trying to say.

 

This post for example.

Surely there are too many variables in a transfer to make a strong assured post like this. Your contact might not know everything himself.

 

His contact may be Rudkin or Shakey! 

 

Seriously what does it matter, we can all believe what we want too, in the end what will be will be, we have no influence one way or another.

[themightyfin]

12 minutes ago, foxoffderby said:

Your saying were not in for GS never have been. John Percy says we are. Now I know Percy doesn't always get it right but he does 8 times out of 10. He is the Midlands reporter for the Telegraph and has his ear to the ground. I trust John Percy more than I do you end of. No do me a favour I don't really want a online argument with you so stop the katty comments and jog on.

There is no argument if you lost it before it's started . Jog on? It's the kinda thing that was said in primary school 30 years ago. 

[themightyfin]

11 minutes ago, foxes21 said:

To be fair you have made a few posts which come across as fact, which is probably what @foxoffderby is trying to say.

 

This post for example.

Surely there are too many variables in a transfer to make a strong assured post like this. Your contact might not know everything himself.

 

I'll state again I never said once I know everything 

[themightyfin]

12 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said:

 

 

Yeah well STOP STATING stuff (and you call me thick) You wonder why you get grief  

 

All you have to say is that this is the case 'as far as you are aware' but you don't get to make statements of fact because you just don't fvcking know anything for sure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'll stop now . Swearing obviously makes you a very hard man I should avoid. 

[lgfualol]

so we are in for him or what?

[brucey]

1 minute ago, lgfualol said:

so we are in for him or what?

whether or not we are in for him, he's not coming here. he's staying at swansea.

[Sol thewall Bamba]

7 minutes ago, lgfualol said:

so we are in for him or what?

This. Cba to trawl back through all these dick waving contests

[HankMarvin]

24 minutes ago, lgfualol said:

so we are in for him or what?

Maybe 

maybe not 

[FoxinNotts]

25 minutes ago, lgfualol said:

so we are in for him or what?

I think Shakespeare wants him (let's face it, who wouldn't! Also, he's the most obvious player we need, and the best player outside the top six teams, in the position we most need to fill).

 

I'm guessing that since he is wanted, that we have sounded Swansea out (in whatever way it is done, behind the scenes, legally).

 

A 'negative' answer was probably given to us back, as you'd expect.

 

We're probably now just biding our time, considering our next move (if any).

[Guest Chocolate Teapot]

This is the most hopeful thread in FT history. Not gonna happen.

[weller54]

7 minutes ago, Abrasive fox said:

This is the most hopeful thread in FT history. Not gonna happen.

This! 

[Blanchflower78]

Pointless thread.

[Wymsey]

17 minutes ago, Abrasive fox said:

This is the most hopeful thread in FT history. Not gonna happen.

Anything can happen.

Look at the 2015/2016 season...

[Kinowe Soorie]

27 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Anything can happen.

Look at the 2015/2016 season...

Remind me, what happened?

[mullet]

9 minutes ago, Kinowe Soorie said:

Remind me, what happened?

Chelsea finished 10th and spurs "put the pressure on" 

[Kinowe Soorie]

Just now, mullet said:

Chelsea finished 10th and spurs "put the pressure on" 

That all?

[ARM1968]

Pretty much. Oh and we signed a reluctant midget from some French wannabes. That was never going to work.  

[Jattdogg]

49 pages of shite just like this useless post. Its sad that ive posted in here. 

 

 

Pint time

[tom27111]

2 hours ago, lgfualol said:

so we are in for him or what?

 

Journalist who gets a lot right says yes.

 

Guy on a forum says no.

 

I'm torn what to believe.

 

 

[ARM1968]

I was torn between my wife and Natalie Imbruglia. 

 

Went for for my wife in the end after Miss Imbruglia got a restraining order. 

[Beliall]

14 minutes ago, tom27111 said:

 

Journalist who gets a lot right says yes.

 

Guy on a forum says no.

 

I'm torn what to believe.

 

 

I pretending that its possible, otherwise I will never finish this wank

[smudger63]

18 minutes ago, tom27111 said:

 

Journalist who gets a lot right says yes.

 

Guy on a forum says no.

 

I'm torn what to believe.

 

 

The thing is, if the journalist who gets a lot right said no, and the guy on the forum said yes, then people would be believing the guy on the forum, and slagging the journalist off, because basically they are believing what they want to be true.

Just chill, what will be will be.