mozartfox Posted 5 July 2017 Posted 5 July 2017 1 hour ago, Collymore said: "Never judge ethnicity by skin colour..." Shakespeare, 2017 Who eat all the pies???
Ricey Posted 5 July 2017 Posted 5 July 2017 I don't think it's a new signing. If it was wouldn't the official photographer be there? None of the people pictured are him.
Melbourne Fuchs Posted 5 July 2017 Posted 5 July 2017 It's Iborra but Wes has already tattooed him, introduction ceremonies these days are tough.
MPH Posted 5 July 2017 Posted 5 July 2017 2 hours ago, Foxy harry said: Looks like that Josh Gordon from the academy, the tattoo matches and the skin tone and hair That's a bit flash...
brucey Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 2 hours ago, dormelcfc said: Have they ever done something like that though with an academy player getting a professional contract? I can't remember any. Don't think so. They announced 2 academy players signing pro contracts yesterday and just put in generic match pics in the announcement article.
Sampson Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 5 hours ago, brucey said: Of course it does. If a fire alarm goes off in an abandoned building, does it make a sound? Of course it doesn't! Sound is just how the human/animal brain interprets particular waves vibrating against the bone of your ear (I.e. one of the forms of deafness is having problems with your brain and neural pathways when all your equipment in your ear works but your brain can't convert that information into sound). Then there are also soundwaves which are of too high or too low a frequency to be heard by humans or animals as we didn't need to evolve to need them to survive - much like there is plenty of lightwaves we cannot see as our brains evolved to save us from escaping from tigers not seeing all the nuances of the universe/multiverse. Sound is just a particular way human and animal brains have evolved to convert particular wave vibrations to warn them of impending predators - we could easily have evolved another way of converting these waves of particles into something other than sound - sonar in animals like bats does something similar for example. But sound by definition requires an observer as it is a brain which converts external stimulus into sound. Without any observer the tree falling in a forest still creates waves of vibrations but with no brains to convert them to sound that's all they are - just waves of particles. Therefore if nothing is around to hear the tree falling in a forest it doesn't make a sound.
The_77 Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 Of course it doesn't! Sound is just how the human/animal brain interprets particular waves vibrating against the bone of your ear (I.e. one of the forms of deafness is having problems with your brain and neural pathways when all your equipment in your ear works but your brain can't convert that information into sound). Then there are also soundwaves which are of too high or too low a frequency to be heard by humans or animals as we didn't need to evolve to need them to survive - much like there is plenty of lightwaves we cannot see as our brains evolved to save us from escaping from tigers not seeing all the nuances of the universe/multiverse. Sound is just a particular way human and animal brains have evolved to convert particular wave vibrations to warn them of impending predators - we could easily have evolved another way of converting these waves of particles into something other than sound - sonar in animals like bats does something similar for example. But sound by definition requires an observer as it is a brain which converts external stimulus into sound. Without any observer the tree falling in a forest still creates waves of vibrations but with no brains to convert them to sound that's all they are - just waves of particles. Therefore if nothing is around to hear the tree falling in a forest it doesn't make a sound.This is one of the best threads in FT history.
nnfox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 3 hours ago, Sampson said: Of course it doesn't! Sound is just how the human/animal brain interprets particular waves vibrating against the bone of your ear (I.e. one of the forms of deafness is having problems with your brain and neural pathways when all your equipment in your ear works but your brain can't convert that information into sound). Then there are also soundwaves which are of too high or too low a frequency to be heard by humans or animals as we didn't need to evolve to need them to survive - much like there is plenty of lightwaves we cannot see as our brains evolved to save us from escaping from tigers not seeing all the nuances of the universe/multiverse. Sound is just a particular way human and animal brains have evolved to convert particular wave vibrations to warn them of impending predators - we could easily have evolved another way of converting these waves of particles into something other than sound - sonar in animals like bats does something similar for example. But sound by definition requires an observer as it is a brain which converts external stimulus into sound. Without any observer the tree falling in a forest still creates waves of vibrations but with no brains to convert them to sound that's all they are - just waves of particles. Therefore if nothing is around to hear the tree falling in a forest it doesn't make a sound. Thank you for clarifying!
foxpleasure Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 3 hours ago, Sampson said: Of course it doesn't! Sound is just how the human/animal brain interprets particular waves vibrating against the bone of your ear (I.e. one of the forms of deafness is having problems with your brain and neural pathways when all your equipment in your ear works but your brain can't convert that information into sound). Then there are also soundwaves which are of too high or too low a frequency to be heard by humans or animals as we didn't need to evolve to need them to survive - much like there is plenty of lightwaves we cannot see as our brains evolved to save us from escaping from tigers not seeing all the nuances of the universe/multiverse. Sound is just a particular way human and animal brains have evolved to convert particular wave vibrations to warn them of impending predators - we could easily have evolved another way of converting these waves of particles into something other than sound - sonar in animals like bats does something similar for example. But sound by definition requires an observer as it is a brain which converts external stimulus into sound. Without any observer the tree falling in a forest still creates waves of vibrations but with no brains to convert them to sound that's all they are - just waves of particles. Therefore if nothing is around to hear the tree falling in a forest it doesn't make a sound. If someone writes a comment on Foxestalk but no-one reads it does that mean it doesn't exist? Remember you dont require a brain to read some of this stuff.
SheppyFox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 3 hours ago, Sampson said: Of course it doesn't! Sound is just how the human/animal brain interprets particular waves vibrating against the bone of your ear (I.e. one of the forms of deafness is having problems with your brain and neural pathways when all your equipment in your ear works but your brain can't convert that information into sound). Then there are also soundwaves which are of too high or too low a frequency to be heard by humans or animals as we didn't need to evolve to need them to survive - much like there is plenty of lightwaves we cannot see as our brains evolved to save us from escaping from tigers not seeing all the nuances of the universe/multiverse. Sound is just a particular way human and animal brains have evolved to convert particular wave vibrations to warn them of impending predators - we could easily have evolved another way of converting these waves of particles into something other than sound - sonar in animals like bats does something similar for example. But sound by definition requires an observer as it is a brain which converts external stimulus into sound. Without any observer the tree falling in a forest still creates waves of vibrations but with no brains to convert them to sound that's all they are - just waves of particles. Therefore if nothing is around to hear the tree falling in a forest it doesn't make a sound. Nerd.
Buce Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 1 minute ago, SheppyFox said: Nerd. It's ok to admit you don't get it. No one will judge you.
Nick Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 I'd like to know why for a guy who's best position is apparently DM why all his highlights reels are of him playing as a CAM or FWD?!
Crinklyfox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 4 hours ago, Sampson said: Of course it doesn't! Sound is just how the human/animal brain interprets particular waves vibrating against the bone of your ear (I.e. one of the forms of deafness is having problems with your brain and neural pathways when all your equipment in your ear works but your brain can't convert that information into sound). Then there are also soundwaves which are of too high or too low a frequency to be heard by humans or animals as we didn't need to evolve to need them to survive - much like there is plenty of lightwaves we cannot see as our brains evolved to save us from escaping from tigers not seeing all the nuances of the universe/multiverse. Sound is just a particular way human and animal brains have evolved to convert particular wave vibrations to warn them of impending predators - we could easily have evolved another way of converting these waves of particles into something other than sound - sonar in animals like bats does something similar for example. But sound by definition requires an observer as it is a brain which converts external stimulus into sound. Without any observer the tree falling in a forest still creates waves of vibrations but with no brains to convert them to sound that's all they are - just waves of particles. Therefore if nothing is around to hear the tree falling in a forest it doesn't make a sound. There are many definitions of sound but the one I like is that it is a thing that can be heard (Oxford English Dictionary). The important word here is 'can'. A sound is something that is able to be heard but it doesn't require anyone to hear it to make it a sound. So if a fire alarm goes off in an abandoned building it creates a sound.
ClaphamFox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 7 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said: I'd like to know why for a guy who's best position is apparently DM why all his highlights reels are of him playing as a CAM or FWD?! Because interceptions and blocks don't make for good highlights reels?
Nick Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 5 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said: Because interceptions and blocks don't make for good highlights reels? Depends if you are interested in football or just watching a players goals and assists I guess! i was equally impressed with Kantes highlights reels from player transfer mkt sites as I was with others who played CF!
ClaphamFox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 2 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said: Depends if you are interested in football or just watching a players goals and assists I guess! i was equally impressed with Kantes highlights reels from player transfer mkt sites as I was with others who played CF! You're clearly more discerning than the average punter!
Nick Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 2 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said: You're clearly more discerning than the average punter! Ha! i just think if you are buying a goalkeeper you should get to see his shot stopping abilities not his set piece taking qualities!
Buce Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 3 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said: Ha! i just think if you are buying a goalkeeper you should get to see his shot stopping abilities not his set piece taking qualities! What? He's a goalkeeper?
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 1 minute ago, Silky_Gylfi said: He's a bloody rock on fifa Certainly has the movement of a rock . . .
SheppyFox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 1 hour ago, Buce said: It's ok to admit you don't get it. No one will judge you. Ha you've already judged me
dpjfox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 Surely hes in the UK by now, this carries on the tradition of struggles to get transfers "over the line"
Babylon Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 11 minutes ago, dpjfox said: Surely hes in the UK by now, this carries on the tradition of struggles to get transfers "over the line" Are you being serious? It's been a grand total of about two and a half days since we even knew there was interest in him. He could sign tomorrow night and it would still be one of the quickest transfers from us finding out about the interest in him and getting a signature.
CosbehFox Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 13 minutes ago, dpjfox said: Surely hes in the UK by now, this carries on the tradition of struggles to get transfers "over the line" Well there's a bloody photo of him at the training ground, that's not much of a struggle is it? Monday transfer accepted, Wednesday at the training ground.
weller54 Posted 6 July 2017 Posted 6 July 2017 6 minutes ago, Cardiff_Fox said: Well there's a bloody photo of him at the training ground, that's not much of a struggle is it? Monday transfer accepted, Wednesday at the training ground. That photo could have been Elvis Presley or Shergar (or both).. It was that blurry!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.