Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
woodland fox

Big moments are just not going our way, says Shakespeare

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, GaelicFox said:

Sorry Craig your just not good enough 

 

your so like Pearson it's scary

 

sooner your gone the better

 

just not a premier league manager 

That doesn't rhyme...did you mean it to, cos it looks like it should...but it doesn't

Posted
Just now, Milo said:

That doesn't rhyme...did you mean it to, cos it looks like it should...but it doesn't

nope mate is a simple statement

 

Shakespeare is BANG average and NOT good enough to be a premier league manager think that's 11 points in 11 or 12 games

 

we need a proper manager not a coach playing at being a manager 

 

he sounds like John Carver at present 

Posted
28 minutes ago, funkyrobot said:

Let's be fair, Chelsea have effectively stripped our first choice champion winning midfield. Kante was instrumental in that game (never mind his lucky goal) and our most experienced other centre mid was sat on the bench. Their fcukin bench ?

 

Probably spend most his time at Chelsea on the bench, screams of bad move to me but time will tell.

Posted
55 minutes ago, KingGTF said:

Think he's clutching a bit saying big moments aren't going out way. The big sides are just better than us.

Man Utd, Arsenal and Chelsea are better than use. 

 

ABSOLUTE DISGRACE!!!!1#1#1##1!!1!

Posted
21 minutes ago, Izzy Muzzett said:

I always get this mixed up.

 

Does that mean won 3, lost 1, drawn none.

Or won 3, drawn 1, lost none?

 

I know Americans always shows stats like this but I'm easily confused :D

Agreed they cant even get the date right. Dont even get me going on the fact they call it soccer. lol 

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I don't want to hear this too often from the manager.

It smacks of excuses.

If we are playing well, making chances and looking a fluid, dangerous side, we'll score goals and win games.

Luck will be on our side.

Posted
1 minute ago, Col city fan said:

I don't want to hear this too often from the manager.

It smacks of excuses.

If we are playing well, making chances and looking a fluid, dangerous side, we'll score goals and win games.

Luck will be on our side.

 

For what it's worth, I agree. When you're saying this after the games against the teams around you, you know you're in trouble, even if it's true.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

They made a mistake and Vardy nipped in near the byline and defender brought him down. It wasn't a chance. It was a penalty we won out of nothing and if he hadn't fouled Vardy we'd not have been in a position to score. Did you even watch the game? lol

 

We created one great chance and missed it. We didn't create many chances. We created pretty much nothing in the second half. What don't you understand? Just stop arguing, you've not got a leg to stand on. You've tried to argue something with nothing to back it up, and worse, you've tried to look clever with sarcasm. It hasn't worked out. Stop. It's embarrassing.

We didn't create much second half but you could argue we created more than Chelsea first half yet they went in one nil up. Honestly it was a pretty scrappy game with not a lot of fluid football played. I think once Iheanacho gets up to speed we'll create and score more.

Posted

He brought out the old Rob Kelly caretaker favourites post match "They're an honest group of lads" "We'll dust ourselves down".

Posted
56 minutes ago, The Horse's Mouth said:

we've been beaten by three sides who should've beaten us, Liverpool was always the favourable tie out of the big boys we drew early on. Some maybe questionable things tactically, but anyone getting on his case at this stage is a ****ing **** tbh. Not getting the full 3 next week could put a bit of pressure on us, but I'm confident we'll be middish table come christmas

Arsenal shouldn't have. We shat the bed there, outplayed them for the vast majority of the game until Shakey went one striker, completely changed the team's mentality, stopped attacking, allowed Arsenal to seize control.

Posted
1 hour ago, GaelicFox said:

Sorry Craig your just not good enough 

 

your so like Pearson it's scary

 

sooner your gone the better

 

just not a premier league manager 

Tough for me to see this perspective. Shakey is working to overhaul the team, get players comfortable on the ball, and replace our aging defenders. If anything, last season Shakey looked like an exceptional in-game manager, consistently making the right adjustments. For me, the problem is his reliance on the conservative approach against superior sides, he waits until we're down to let the dogs loose, and we tend to look much better 2H against teams when we go down because we go to a more aggressive look, often a 4-3-3, which was what we basically played at times today in the 2H. 

 

So on the one hand, I'm irked with how Shakey is starting games. We aren't getting nil-nil, or 1-1 draws against top sides this season if we're defending 75% of the game, as we looked to be doing first half. But on the other hand, Shakey has absolutely shown himself to be an above average Prem League manager. I think the big issue is the personnel not being available -- Iheanacho, Iborra, now Silva... and yes, I think we've had some misfortune as well including today with that point blank save on Slim's shot.

 

All that said, today was nowhere near as disgusting as last week. We weren't absolutely dominated. But we need to start fielding our better attacking units. We need a critical mass of offensive players who can stress the defense. Vardy, Iheancho, Gray, Mahrez, and hopefully Silva sometime the next couple weeks, all on the field together, and if not Silva then Iborra. But I think Shakey can get us there. Who would you want in if he were out?

Posted

To say it's down to bad luck or fine margins is an excuse.  Take some damn responsibility.  You pcked the formation.  You picked the starting 11.  You are the guy who brought on a striker for a midfielder when we were winning at Arsenal, and then a midfielder for a striker when we are losing today and at Old Trafford.  If those moments didn't go our way it is your fault.  You continue to pick a 2 man midfield when it is constantly getting overrun.  You (allegedly) identified a new signing on deadline day and then didn't even involve him in the match day squad.  It's got sod all to do with big moments not going our way.  

Posted
2 hours ago, ScouseFox said:

the ozil hand ball completely changed and cost us the arsenal game. 

 

then there's the 30 seconds or so where we miss a sitter and they go and score a decent goal. 

 

two decent examples of how we could've had a 4-6 more points from an incredibly tough start to the season if "big moments" had gone more in our favour. 

 

still dont think its much of an issue, yet. we are meant to lose these games, and we've been in and played alright in all 3 so far, whilst looking very good in the only game against a lower side. guess it just depends what the actually aim/expectation of the season is. we'd need to take some points from these games if we're actually trying to get into europe, however we can be comfortably mid table without having to pick up more points than we lose against the "top 6". 

The Ozil handball is not why Arsenal scored.  Out inability to defend a corner is why they scored.  That is our fault.

Posted
9 minutes ago, chicagofox said:

The Ozil handball is not why Arsenal scored.  Out inability to defend a corner is why they scored.  That is our fault.

well we wouldn't have conceded from a corner if we'd had a free kick, would we? that's a pretty big moment going against us, isn't it? yeah it is. thought so. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, ScouseFox said:

well we wouldn't have conceded from a corner if we'd had a free kick, would we? that's a pretty big moment going against us, isn't it? yeah it is. thought so. 

You can take any goal back as far as you want to prove a point.  But, if we had defended a corner correctly they wouldn't have scored.  Would they? No.

Posted
1 minute ago, chicagofox said:

You can take any goal back as far as you want to prove a point.  But, if we had defended a corner correctly they wouldn't have scored.  Would they? No.

i don't understand the point you're trying to make? 

 

he said some big moments have gone against us. i pointed out one of those big moments that went against us. what are you on about? 

Posted
Just now, ScouseFox said:

i don't understand the point you're trying to make? 

 

he said some big moments have gone against us. i pointed out one of those big moments that went against us. what are you on about? 

Every team has moments go against them.  Every team has good luck and bad luck.  It's an excuse to blame them for a defeat.  What big moment went against us today?  Whatever you come up with will be less responsible for the defeat than the ridiculous team selection and formation.

Posted
1 minute ago, chicagofox said:

Every team has moments go against them.  Every team has good luck and bad luck.  It's an excuse to blame them for a defeat.  What big moment went against us today?  Whatever you come up with will be less responsible for the defeat than the ridiculous team selection and formation.

we held our own quite comfortably for about 40 minutes and then the big moment came and went against us. we should've been 1-0 up and somehow ended up 1-0 down at half time. 

 

there is no chance you'd have been calling it a ridiculous selection or formation if we were 1-0 up at half time and slimani had got the goal. didn't happen of course, cos the big moment didn't go our way. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, chicagofox said:

To say it's down to bad luck or fine margins is an excuse.  Take some damn responsibility.  You pcked the formation.  You picked the starting 11.  You are the guy who brought on a striker for a midfielder when we were winning at Arsenal, and then a midfielder for a striker when we are losing today and at Old Trafford.  If those moments didn't go our way it is your fault.  You continue to pick a 2 man midfield when it is constantly getting overrun.  You (allegedly) identified a new signing on deadline day and then didn't even involve him in the match day squad.  It's got sod all to do with big moments not going our way.  

Take some responsibility for losing against a better side? 

Fook me some of our supporters are morons! 

We've played three of the richest sides in the world with some of the best players and coaching staff.

The results last year in the same fixtures:

Arsenal 1-0 

United 4-1

Chelsea 3-0

 

however you look at it, we are doing much better than last year and are at least competitive at times in games and creating chances, more than can be said for the corresponding fixtures last year.

Today I would see for all their possession, they created one clear cut chance, so did we. 

They took theirs we didn't, the top 6 will always take their chances. That's what makes them so good.

We are 8th at best in this league, judge us when we have played a few more of the teams we expect to finish around or below us.

Posted
5 minutes ago, ScouseFox said:

we held our own quite comfortably for about 40 minutes and then the big moment came and went against us. we should've been 1-0 up and somehow ended up 1-0 down at half time. 

 

there is no chance you'd have been calling it a ridiculous selection or formation if we were 1-0 up at half time and slimani had got the goal. didn't happen of course, cos the big moment didn't go our way. 

Actually I thought playing 4-4-2 again was  ridiculous from the moment I saw the lineup and had we scored first I still would have thought so. 

Posted

The post match was very contradictory.

 

Saying “we HAD to change the shape” after you’ve said we should have been ahead just before they scored makes zero sense.

 

If we HAD to change the shape you’d think we were 2-0 down or at the very least getting torn to shreds and we were neither! 

Posted

Poor craftsmen look for excuses to paper over the cracks, and hide their shortcomings....

 

I'm afraid a series of bad decisions have ultimately put us in this place, and that dates back to last season. You just have to hope it's not one mistake too many. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, Aus Fox said:

Take some responsibility for losing against a better side? 

Fook me some of our supporters are morons! 

We've played three of the richest sides in the world with some of the best players and coaching staff.

The results last year in the same fixtures:

Arsenal 1-0 

United 4-1

Chelsea 3-0

 

however you look at it, we are doing much better than last year and are at least competitive at times in games and creating chances, more than can be said for the corresponding fixtures last year.

Today I would see for all their possession, they created one clear cut chance, so did we. 

They took theirs we didn't, the top 6 will always take their chances. That's what makes them so good.

We are 8th at best in this league, judge us when we have played a few more of the teams we expect to finish around or below us.

We lost to Utd, Chelsea, and Arsenal last season and we have lost to them this season.  I would suggest fhat is not a better record.

 

Shakespeare needs to take responsibility for his team selections, formations, and substitutions.  All of which are questionable at best.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...