Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 24/10/2024 at 22:45, Wymsey said:

Frydales is the best one in Leicester, personally.

Followed by Grimsby Fisheries.

Changed ownership recently. 
 

I do/did like a chip shop dinner but the prices nowadays for a family of 4 is ridiculous for what it is. Also the one I use seem to be on portion control. Less chips, smaller fish but higher prices. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Bear said:

I'm still firmly of the opinion that the public shouldn't be allowed to buy them. Organised displays only with licenses issued by the local council who can charge for them. 

Works well over here.  Mind you that is mainly to stop the whole country being on fire.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 06/11/2024 at 10:13, BenTheFox said:

It's wrong that there's a statue of Vichai outside of the ground but not one for any player or manager. 

Said this at the time. Was our best owner of course, but its a bit odd. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Koke said:

 

Why ?

The rules are a farce to start with and we're only brought in by Chelsea, Man U, Liverpool and Arsenal to stop any more Man Citys, all while those teams bend the rules so much themselves.

 

Plus the charges trigger Man U and Liverpool fans so much. To be honest it's mainly this one.

Edited by Nalis
  • Haha 1
Posted

The rules may be farcical and anti-competitive, but I still want those that break them punished as severely as possible. 

 

The likes of the bottom half teams who've had to restrict spending to comply have been severely disadvantaged, and allowing the bigger clubs to disregard the rules would be a smack in the face to those who've followed them. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nalis said:

The rules are force to start with and we're only brought in by Chelsea, Man U, Liverpool and Arsenal to stop any more Man Citys, all while those teams bend the rules so much themselves.

 

Plus the charges trigger Man U and Liverpool fans so much. To be honest it's mainly this one.

I’m the same.

 

I’ve no issue with Manchester City. I know about 2 people who support them and they actually live in Manchester.

 

It’s the 10,000s of others that support Arsenal, Manchester United and Liverpool …. Great to see them triggered. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Most of the 115 or whatever are small fry things from absolutely years ago. Being stripped of titles would be farcical - I’m fed up of football discussion centred on regulations and finances and if they’re severely punished it only gets worse.

Posted
2 hours ago, Samilktray said:

Also be quite funny to see @Fox92 reaction to Man City's getting away with the charges

(only joking Fox92 youre a good lad)

(I'm not joking that much would be funny tbh)

lol I refrained from posting when I saw that Nalis post that.

Posted
2 minutes ago, foxes1988 said:

Farmland is not beautiful countryside but rather a rural industrial estate

Been saying this for years, modern farming is a blight on our countryside and the environment. 
loss of habitat, overuse of pesticides and herbicides and overgrazing of sheep and cattle have a lot to answer for 

Posted
19 minutes ago, foxes1988 said:

Farmland is not beautiful countryside but rather a rural industrial estate

 

14 minutes ago, jgtuk said:

Been saying this for years, modern farming is a blight on our countryside and the environment. 
loss of habitat, overuse of pesticides and herbicides and overgrazing of sheep and cattle have a lot to answer for 

I'd be interested to hear what alternatives spring to mind that wouldn't result in a massive population crash.

Posted
1 minute ago, leicsmac said:

 

I'd be interested to hear what alternatives spring to mind that wouldn't result in a massive population crash.

I’d also be interested. I just know that after more than 40 years (on and off) of helping to gather data on flora and fauna that a very large proportion of losses can be attributed to modern agriculture practices. 
 

Posted
1 minute ago, jgtuk said:

I’d also be interested. I just know that after more than 40 years (on and off) of helping to gather data on flora and fauna that a very large proportion of losses can be attributed to modern agriculture practices. 

No doubt. I think switching to much safer chemicals in pesticides and herbicides would go a long way to helping. Especially when you get the runoff into rivers and streams. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...