Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Tuna

FA Cup 2017-18

By Tuna, in General Football and Sport

Recommended Posts

Facecloth

Facecloth

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kingfox said:

All been correct though mate.

True, but Pawson seems over reliant on it, whilst other refs won't go near as their egos are too big. Moss probably wouldn't have review any of them. That's why the decision to use it needs handing to the manager or captain. So like tennis, if you over keen and use them all up early on stupidly then they're gone, if you use them when you're confident you'll get the decision you keep the review.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
Just now, Facecloth said:

True, but Pawson seems over reliant on it, whilst other refs won't go near as their egos are too big. Moss probably wouldn't have review any of them. That's why the decision to use it needs handing to the manager or captain. So like tennis, if you over keen and use them all up early on stupidly then they're gone, if you use them when you're confident you'll get the decision you keep the review.

it's not the on-field referee that decides. It's the VAR all the way in London who advises whether to check. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Facecloth

Facecloth

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, StanSP said:

it's not the on-field referee that decides. It's the VAR all the way in London who advises whether to check. 

They can both initiate a review. So if the ref feels he might have missed something he can ask for a check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jammie82uk

jammie82uk

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said:

They have, but why did he really need to consult it for the 1st and 3rd. Lino should see the offside and I’m not sure why he checked the 3rd. He’s bottling the decisions and it’s actually pretty pointless having an actual person on the pitch reffing it as a result.

 

And that’s without even mentioning the fact fans are celebrating goals 3 minutes after they go in. It needs to improve.

VAR has to be checked for every goal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kingfox

kingfox

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

True, but Pawson seems over reliant on it, whilst other refs won't go near as their egos are too big. Moss probably wouldn't have review any of them. That's why the decision to use it needs handing to the manager or captain. So like tennis, if you over keen and use them all up early on stupidly then they're gone, if you use them when you're confident you'll get the decision you keep the review.

Well the two refs you mentioned are both idiots in their own special way lol

 

It gets decisions correct and that's the main thing, only problem is the time it takes. If you're going to have a three challenge review system as you seem to be pointing out then it will still cause uproar, plus the time it takes would probably be the same if not longer.

 

VAR is a work in progress, it's early days but the decisions that have been reviewed, have been correct in every match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kingfox said:

Well the two refs you mentioned are both idiots in their own special way lol

 

It gets decisions correct and that's the main thing, only problem is the time it takes. If you're going to have a three challenge review system as you seem to be pointing out then it will still cause uproar, plus the time it takes would probably be the same if not longer.

 

VAR is a work in progress, it's early days but the decisions that have been reviewed, have been correct in every match.

Nope. Got the Willian one wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Facecloth

Facecloth

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, kingfox said:

Well the two refs you mentioned are both idiots in their own special way lol

 

It gets decisions correct and that's the main thing, only problem is the time it takes. If you're going to have a three challenge review system as you seem to be pointing out then it will still cause uproar, plus the time it takes would probably be the same if not longer.

 

VAR is a work in progress, it's early days but the decisions that have been reviewed, have been correct in every match.

I understand it's a work in progress, that's why I'm making a suggestion to improve it.

 

The limited manager challenges wouldn't be like it is now. It would mean everyone would know what was going one. The ref could just ref as normal with no thought he might need help. Once your reviews are gone, they're gone, so there can be no arguments of the ref favouring one team by review some things and not others. It would just sort the whole thing out, calm the chaos just make it more organised.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...