HighPeakFox Posted 2 January 2018 Posted 2 January 2018 Sorry to ask a miserable question, but which of these PL clubs is least unbearable, in this scenario?
Harry - LCFC Posted 2 January 2018 Posted 2 January 2018 Chelsea; a team who can win the league and who compete regularly in the CL, but aren't managed by Mourinho. I'd hate it still though. 1
HighPeakFox Posted 2 January 2018 Author Posted 2 January 2018 Should this thread be in the main forum? That's what I intended
The Quick Brown Fox Posted 2 January 2018 Posted 2 January 2018 Least unbearable would make it the most bearable can I change my vote? I voted wrong. 4
HighPeakFox Posted 2 January 2018 Author Posted 2 January 2018 2 minutes ago, browniefox said: Least unbearable would make it the most bearable can I change my vote? I voted wrong. of course
sylofox Posted 2 January 2018 Posted 2 January 2018 Well I fvcked that up rushing. I hang my head in shame I voted spud cvnts thinking it was most unbearable. Going to find some razor blades a rope and sit in a hot bath with an electric fire 2
urban.spaceman Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Let's face it the two clubs he's likely to achieve anything at is Manure & Chelsea. Chelsea would be taking the absolute piss if they came in for another of our title winners. If they do tell them it's £100m minimum, or Hazard. To be honest I'd rather he went to Europe.
ALC Fox Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 I can't bring myself to vote. All of them would be too unbearable. Barcelona, PSG or hell, bloomin' Dynamo Kiev before any of that lot. 1
Dan Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 (edited) You missed off Man City and if I voted any it'd be them. I actually think Man Utd will rile me the least for some reason. You'd see one hell of a player there for them once Mourinho ****s off. I'd have gone with Chelsea if it wasn't for the fact they're become to us what Liverpool are to Southampton. Kante, Drinkwater and Mahrez re-united, all in blue, ****ing hell. Edited 3 January 2018 by Dan LCFC 2
stripeyfox Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 8 hours ago, sylofox said: Well I fvcked that up rushing. I hang my head in shame I voted spud cvnts thinking it was most unbearable. Going to find some razor blades a rope and sit in a hot bath with an electric fire This is the only reasonable punishment for you. I'm sorry
ealingfox Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Went with Liverpool cos I find them the most likeable of the 5 and would be great watching the others froth if they had success with him there. Although in a way Spurs would be comforting - at least we'd be safe in the knowledge that he'd never win anything again.
ozleicester Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Manu - He wont last with Mourinho and maybe we can buy him back next season Chelsea - If they buy Mahrez as well, they have our midfield... i can just pretend they are Leicester 2.0 Liverpool - They just replacing Coutinho (sucks to be a small club ay lads) Spurs - just coz if they were to win something, we could still claim credit Arsenal - think he would go up another level with them
volpeazzurro Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 For me, thinking of the player himself and not my own predudices, it had to be Arsenal as it would be a waste of a career with such potential . They are a team on a downward spiral lacking ambition and vision, when Sanchez and Ozil go this year then what? Apart from wanting to live in London, what top player would really want to go there now. They are serial underachievers who aspire to nothing great. Even when in Europe they never give it their full effort, they are a waste of a place. Marhez would be propping up more of the same and disappear into obscurity. This is his one big chance if you must move don't waste it! 2
shen Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 14 minutes ago, volpeazzurro said: For me, thinking of the player himself and not my own predudices, it had to be Arsenal as it would be a waste of a career with such potential . They are a team on a downward spiral lacking ambition and vision, when Sanchez and Ozil go this year then what? Apart from wanting to live in London, what top player would really want to go there now. They are serial underachievers who aspire to nothing great. Even when in Europe they never give it their full effort, they are a waste of a place. Marhez would be propping up more of the same and disappear into obscurity. This is his one big chance if you must move don't waste it! I wouldn't go that far. They are achieving to the level expected of their squad I think. They have been remarkably consistent getting into the CL and finished second behind us when we won, along with a couple of FA Cup wins. Arguably only Man Utd, Chelsea, Man City and ourselves have eclipsed them in that period. They do need some fresh ideas and steady performers. Mahrez would be a good player for them, but they need a host of new players to improve on their current squad.
Guest Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 9 hours ago, HighPeakFox said: Should this thread be in the main forum? That's what I intended It should be in the bin.
weller54 Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 52 minutes ago, stripeyfox said: This is the only reasonable punishment for you. I'm sorry Too lenient IMO.. Add piranhas to the bath and go for it!!
Ric Flair Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Man City would be the only club I’d tolerate taking him in this country, or AFC Wimbledon.
HighPeakFox Posted 3 January 2018 Author Posted 3 January 2018 I left Man City out very deliberately, imagining they'd take too many votes.
lgfualol Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Oh god Mahrez in Liverpool's team would be nuts.
Guest Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Just now, lgfualol said: Oh god Mahrez in Liverpool's team would be nuts. He couldn't get in. It'd be interesting for those naming other teams to say who would be dropped in order for Mahrez to play. I think the highest team he could get into is Burnleys.
jayfox26 Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Liverpool for me. United, Arsenal and Chelsea would all ruin him and i reckon Klopp would get the very best out of him. When Coutinho goes a front 4 of Mahrez, Salah,Firmino and Mane wouldn't be too shabby. Cant believe Spurs are on the list. A few pundits have said that Spurs should sign him. People seem to forget that Spurs cant afford him. I believe he earns a similar amount to Kane and Alli at the moment. No way would they pay Mahrez more than them and no way would Mahrez move without a big pay rise
volpeazzurro Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 2 hours ago, shen said: I wouldn't go that far. They are achieving to the level expected of their squad I think. They have been remarkably consistent getting into the CL and finished second behind us when we won, along with a couple of FA Cup wins. Arguably only Man Utd, Chelsea, Man City and ourselves have eclipsed them in that period. They do need some fresh ideas and steady performers. Mahrez would be a good player for them, but they need a host of new players to improve on their current squad. That's like just accepting that because we're currently a middle of the table side that we should not even strive to go one step further even if you had the means to do so.. One teams consistent 4th or continual qualification for Europe is a another teams failure, ask many an Arsenal fan, I think you'll find them unhappy. When theyve qualified they usually exit quite quickly through fielding weakened sides due to their obsession in the Premiership merely to requalify to obtain more dosh year on year. They've had money to spend, they haven't. They've consistently needed certain types of player that the fans and pundits all agree on but have bought yet more of the same. Marhez is quite obviously not their first choice anyway, he'd be a make do because the real player they want doesn't want to go there. When Sanchez and Ozil go, if Marhez goes there he'll just add to the 'all fur coat and no knickers' illusion of a team they are. He will be nothing more than ephemeral icing on a mythical cake. He would waste his career, he's better than that. Arsenal will not achieve anything until Wenger is gone and there are big changes in personel or direction in their board.
Redouane Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 Chelsea, just because I want to see what the combination of Mahrez and Hazard would look like. 1
Dan Posted 3 January 2018 Posted 3 January 2018 (edited) 53 minutes ago, FIF said: He couldn't get in. It'd be interesting for those naming other teams to say who would be dropped in order for Mahrez to play. I think the highest team he could get into is Burnleys. He'd get into any side in the league bar probably Man City and maybe Liverpool given Salah's form. Wouldn't swap him for Pedro or Willian and think he'd get in Spurs or Arsenal's sides. Edited 3 January 2018 by Dan LCFC
Recommended Posts