Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, foxfanazer said:

Could be a good game tonight. Think Bournemouth will edge it 

I think so too.

 

Howe doesn't fool around. Starting King, Solanke and both the Wilsons.

Posted
Just now, UniFox21 said:

That's where I think the rule needs slightly tweaking 

I think that was offside enough to be disallowed- didnt need to be micro analysing if he was ahead of the last defender ..... I could see it clearly from the first replay without freeze framing 

  • Like 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

I think that was offside enough to be disallowed- didnt need to be micro analysing if he was ahead of the last defender ..... I could see it clearly from the first replay without freeze framing 

Fully agree with you here, just when it becomes like a little toe Is when it's too far 

Posted (edited)

I'm sorry but my tinfoil hat is going on. 

 

I almost honestly believe the FA are deliberately ****ing up VAR so they can get rid of it without people complaining and go back to giving Arsenal, Man Utd and Liverpool free wins. 

 

This is getting bullshit. Stop using VAR to justify and vindicate your ****ing shit refs and actually use it like it should be used. 

 

I love video technology I really do. You all know I'm a rugby nerd, earlier today Nigel Owens (best ref in any sport on the planet) gave an on field decision as try. That's on field decision. Now, in the FA world, that means there's got to be an objective clear and obvious reason to over turn it. But because Rugby isn't retarded, the TMO watched it back and realised that there was a very good chance the player was out of control and had knocked on. 

 

It wasn't clear and obvious, at full speed it actually looked somewhat controversial. But they slowed it down frame by frame and came to the correct decision that Nigel and his touch judge were wrong. So they talked it out between them, turned it over and even though it meant upsetting the host nation in the opening game, the try was ruled out. 

 

So why the flaming **** can a Premier league VAR not overrule an incorrect ref decision unless there's some objectively obvious cheating going on somehow? 

 

That's OBVIOUSLY a penalty. The defender doesn't touch the ball and totally tangles up the strikers legs. So give it for christ sakes.

 

This is nothing to do with VAR being shit or technology being shit this is just our FA being ****ing inept or corrupt or retarded, delete as appropriate, with how they choose to implement it. 

 

Apologies for my passion I'm half cut but **** me I'd stand by this bizarrely sweary rant sober. 

 

Edited by Finnegan
  • Like 3
Guest seanfox778
Posted

Solanke was a strange buy for how expensive he was. I don’t ever recall him looking that good at Liverpool and he’s never looked that impressive when I’ve seen him play for Bournemouth. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

I almost honestly believe the FA are deliberately ****ing up VAR so they can get rid of it without people complaining and go back to giving Arsenal, Man Utd and Liverpool free wins. 

:nigel:

Posted

Fwiw, I felt king moved his leg across in front of the defender to draw contact. Is that a reasonable thing for a striker to do?  if the ref had given it then var wouldn’t have overturned the decision ....... 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...