Match Ratings: Man City 2-5 Leicester City - Vote Now

[Mark]

Season: 2020/21
Voting Starts: 27/09/20
Voting Ends: 02/10/20

1. Kasper Schmeichel
2. Timothy Castagne
3. Daniel Amartey
4. Jonny Evans
5. Çağlar Söyüncü
6. James Justin
7. Dennis Praet
8. Youri Tielemans
9. Nampalys Mendy
10. Harvey Barnes
11. Jamie Vardy
12. James Maddison (sub)
13. Christian Fuchs (sub)
14. Kelechi Iheanacho (sub)

[Nalis]

Tens. Tens for everyone.

[Mehrez]

[peach0000]

 

 

I'm not his biggest fan but that's a bit harsh on Iheanacho 

[kingfox]

Vardy, Tielemans and Mendy deserve more than 10.

[foxfanazer]

Gonna be hard not to give all 10's but I'll try to be objective. Kasper barely had a save to make 

[Lesterlad]

16 minutes ago, kingfox said:

Vardy, Tielemans and Mendy deserve more than 10.

And Amartey he was superb considering it’s his first league game in 2 years 

[jonthefox]

Tens 

[Aus Fox]

Wait, manager confidence at 98% three games in won 3 scored 12 goals d thrashed the most expensive side in world football in their own back yard and we still have 2% who want the manager to leave.

AmaZing

[peach0000]

2 hours ago, Aus Fox said:

Wait, manager confidence at 98% three games in won 3 scored 12 goals d thrashed the most expensive side in world football in their own back yard and we still have 2% who want the manager to leave.

AmaZing

99% with 78 votes. It was only one person 

[Bezzanator89]

2 minutes ago, peach0000 said:

99% with 78 votes. It was only one person 

Probably a salty Celtic supporter.

[Royston.]

2 hours ago, foxfanazer said:

Gonna be hard not to give all 10's but I'll try to be objective. Kasper barely had a save to make 

Remember he made one or two solid saves but "city" rarely tested him.

 

Distribution was wank as always, im just thankful when it doesnt lead to giving away goals.

[Royston.]

Always vote leave on the manager as its such a stupid option.

 

Out of 10 then he gets 10 tonight but its the players who were fantastic.

[Raw Dykes]

1 hour ago, Royston. said:

Always vote leave on the manager as its such a stupid option.

 

Out of 10 then he gets 10 tonight but its the players who were fantastic.

Why?

[Will1981]

1 hour ago, Royston. said:

Always vote leave on the manager as its such a stupid option.

 

Out of 10 then he gets 10 tonight but its the players who were fantastic.

I agree it is a stupid option would be better if it was a 1-10 rating like the players.

[Fulham]

5 hours ago, Lesterlad said:

And Amartey he was superb considering it’s his first league game in 2 years 

we are waiting for  Amartey at Fulham

[Royston.]

2 hours ago, Raw Dykes said:

Why?

Cause most sane people wouldnt vote stay one week then leave the next.

 

Rate him 1-10 on a game basis like the players.

[Fightforever]

6 minutes ago, Royston. said:

Cause most sane people wouldnt vote stay one week then leave the next.

 

Rate him 1-10 on a game basis like the players.

I think its good because it stops the puel in or out type polls that were poping up every week at one point.

[Raw Dykes]

6 minutes ago, Royston. said:

Cause most sane people wouldnt vote stay one week then leave the next.

 

Rate him 1-10 on a game basis like the players.

I don't think that matters. I see your point - it's not going to change much week by week, but I think it's still a valid question. At some point, people will change their mind based on results or performances.

[Royston.]

25 minutes ago, Raw Dykes said:

I don't think that matters. I see your point - it's not going to change much week by week, but I think it's still a valid question. At some point, people will change their mind based on results or performances.

Yes but not after one game.

However the option is there every game and thats why its stupid.

Edited 28 September 2020 by Royston.

[Raw Dykes]

4 minutes ago, Royston. said:

Yes but not after one game.

However the option is there every game and thats why its stupid.

But it's a binary question. At some point, anyone's answer could change from one to the other. It's not stupid.

 

Let's say a manager is doing well, but gradually, results get worse and worse. People's answers will change from 'stay' to 'leave' at some point, but they probably won't all change their mind at the same time. You can't get an accurate measure of the general support unless you ask the question after each match.

[NaijaFox]

5 hours ago, Raw Dykes said:

But it's a binary question. At some point, anyone's answer could change from one to the other. It's not stupid.

 

Let's say a manager is doing well, but gradually, results get worse and worse. People's answers will change from 'stay' to 'leave' at some point, but they probably won't all change their mind at the same time. You can't get an accurate measure of the general support unless you ask the question after each match.

Just rate the Manager 1-10, and then poll “in” or “out” as and when necessary. If anyone wants the Manager out, the person can start a poll him/herself. The current vote is hardly illuminating. For example, I would have gladly given Bren a failing grade for the Bournemouth disaster last season, but even then didn’t want him out.

[Ian Nacho]

Really difficult to point point a stand out player. They were all class.