Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, HankMarvin said:

someone with a bit of pace as a winger on the right causing all sorts problems 

who wouldve thought that

There’s no doubt he should be given a start against Burnley on Saturday.

Posted
3 minutes ago, sishades said:

No..Cantwell stood in front of Kaspar...

I said similar. Anyway, that's what it was given for, so not much we can do about it now.

Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

They've brought on another defender for Vardy to play against - surely we should bring on another striker now? 

 

 

Cannot believe Rodgers hasn’t even considered Nacho yet.

Posted
1 minute ago, RowlattsFox said:

It's a joke but Kasper claims for that every time. The one at one Norwich was a joke in our favour too. 

Cantwell was pretty much on Kasper's toes. 

 

Sanchez had acres of space and was never getting to the strike anyway. Don't think they're comparable. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Sampson said:

You can't blame Schmeichel for Tielemans standing there like a statue while he should be marking Wellbeck.

 

It was just a dreadful individual mistake from Tielemans.

Not blaming for the goal and it’s not this game it’s a general comment. We need a leader on the pitch that can influence a game and get the people around him to have their heads screwed on 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Onions said:

Norwich did the same to us and it was offside, not sure why people are angry, or short memories?

Two wrongs don't make a right. Also, he was intentionally impeding Kasper, don't think Barnes was !

Edited by LCFCCHRIS
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, Tom12345 said:

Still don’t understand how Barnes was is in the way.

On the replay, he initially is in front, but Barnes moves away.. the ref and VAR do not seem to consider he moved far away enough at the time Lookman headed it goalwards. Obviously we disagree with their decision, but can't do much now.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SemperEadem said:

And to think some chant for and lap VAR up. 

This isn't the fault of VAR though? This is the fault of the twat sat in front of the monitor

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Phube said:


There we go. 
 

So now we’re left with a standard defensive injury sub and Nacho on 78mins… :mellow:


Part one complete. Just Nacho to go!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...