Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

He is highly rated, if we could get a deal done for £5-6m we should do.

Do you see us spending that sort of money on a GK.

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
14 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Do you see us spending that sort of money on a GK.

Only for a first choice keeper.  Maybe next summer.

 

Given their position I'd think that number was too high though.  They let Gassama go for less than £2mill, not sure why they'd be expecting 3 times that on a keeper.

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Do you see us spending that sort of money on a GK.

If it was £5-6m I possibly could as its £1m on PSR but at the same time I could see us not doing so as we have bigger priorities IMO.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

If it was £5-6m I possibly could as its £1m on PSR but at the same time I could see us not doing so as we have bigger priorities IMO.

I hate myself for saying this but could be an opportunity to be absolutely ruthless, Wednesday need cash so offer £2m up front no sell on or add ons, just one up front payment, reckon they would have little option but too accept. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

I hate myself for saying this but could be an opportunity to be absolutely ruthless, Wednesday need cash so offer £2m up front no sell on or add ons, just one up front payment, reckon they would have little option but too accept. 

And loan him straight back. Money for nothing for them.  If they get relegated what will they get for him then?

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, LestaLad said:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/36225113/sheffield-wednesday-points-deduction-player-transfer-exclusive/

 

Alan Nixon links us to Pierce Charles in this. Their asking price is £8m. Rangers & Southampton are also interested. 

They ain’t getting 8 million for any player even if there worth it! Very good keeper and good with his feet ain’t he ? I’d be happy if this was true.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Phenom said:

He looks a bit short but had 11 saves today. Seems like a good fit if we want to play possession based football.

Apart from his feet as he put it out about 6 times - Mind we had a world class keeper who used to do that

and he won the prem!

Posted

Mads is good with his feet and put it out a lot last season.  Keepers who are good with their feet don't get much chance to show it when their team is pushed so far back they're down their throats.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Sankey93 said:

Buy him immediately and start him.


 

if we had a lot of money to spend, I’d want him, but we really really need a striker..

 

and let’s not forget the fingertip save stolarczyk made himself to tip a ball onto the post..

  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, coolhandfox said:

He's crap, everything was straight at him and he can't pass.

I wasn't too convinced by him either. Most shots were straight at him. Granted the Daka one was decent. But he didn't look comfortable kicking the ball, I couldn't tell you why.

 

I think it was more our shooting that made him look better. Not a position we need urgently, and he'll go from starter to bench/3rd choice. He's better where he is. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, HoustonFox said:

Made him look good today, nearly everything at him. Did look confident though but Stols is just as good.  Not a position we need 

Jakub is so much better. 

Posted

Wasn’t particularly impressed with him.

Most of his saves were pretty much straight at him. His distribution was pretty awful.

Fumbled a few shots as well that he should have taken cleanly.

Would prefer the options we have.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...