Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, FrankieADZ said:

 

I can't see this happening. The only way it possibly could is a loan with a guarantee that he'll be out main striker. But would Inter let him drop a division in another country, when he scored in the CWC and is highly rated. I'm not so sure. 

Posted
On 08/07/2025 at 03:12, Lambert09 said:

Just saw a link to Josh sergeant because he is with Wasserman. Sure we can’t pay 600k for Rohl but we’ll spend 15m on a striker lol

 

same article suggested Oxlade-Chamberlein was close 

We’ve paid £400000release clause for Cifuentes so the Rohl story about not paying his release clause must be untrue?

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, stu said:

I assume this means Harry Toffolo.

 

Left back, just released from Forest.

I wouldn't be mad at that if VK goes, leaving Toffolo and Thomas as our LB choices. 

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Scotch said:

I wouldn't be mad at that if VK goes, leaving Toffolo and Thomas as our LB choices. 

If Dyche had taken job this would have been done, not as certain now. He’s got a few offers on the table, will decide by end of July. We would be ideal for him, only lives 20 mins from Seagrave 

Posted

Toffolo is solid but we don't need him. VK out, still got Thomas, Aluko, Justin and Coulibaly who all play there. Discounting Ricardo as he's likely to be a CM next season.

  • Like 4
Posted
1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

Toffolo is solid but we don't need him. VK out, still got Thomas, Aluko, Justin and Coulibaly who all play there. Discounting Ricardo as he's likely to be a CM next season.

I guess if Thomas is out they may want balance with a left footed player. Only logic I can think of.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

Toffolo is solid but we don't need him. VK out, still got Thomas, Aluko, Justin and Coulibaly who all play there. Discounting Ricardo as he's likely to be a CM next season.

What we don’t know is who else has an eye on the exit door, didn’t Riccy say after  the season finished that he would be open to a new project. I would not be surprised if 3 or 4 players that aren’t in the fans bomb squad are open to moves if the right opportunity comes along, I would not be surprised in the slightest if Riccy, Winks, Skipp and even Mavididi have been assessing their options and open to potential moves. 
 

 

Posted

Not better than what we've got, doesn't have any outstanding qualities, 30 next month, wasserman client, typical agent led Rudkin bottlejob signing on a 3/4 year contract out of favour and stuck with after 10 games

Posted
25 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Toffolo is solid but we don't need him. VK out, still got Thomas, Aluko, Justin and Coulibaly who all play there. Discounting Ricardo as he's likely to be a CM next season.

This is true but it leaves a situation were we don't have any left footers or natural left sided players in the whole backline. 

A right footed LCB, passing to a right footed LB whilst under pressure from a press could cause issues. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

Not better than what we've got, doesn't have any outstanding qualities, 30 next month, wasserman client, typical agent led Rudkin bottlejob signing on a 3/4 year contract out of favour and stuck with after 10 games

Is he actually a wasserman client ffs

Posted
50 minutes ago, Scotch said:

This is true but it leaves a situation were we don't have any left footers or natural left sided players in the whole backline. 

A right footed LCB, passing to a right footed LB whilst under pressure from a press could cause issues. 

Who was the lad that replaced VK yesterday? Ali or something like that? He looked like a decent player

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, dbtcity said:

Who was the lad that replaced VK yesterday? Ali or something like that? He looked like a decent player

Missed Ali. Yeah, he looks decent. 

Posted
On 11/07/2025 at 06:53, David Gutteridge said:

We’ve paid £400000release clause for Cifuentes so the Rohl story about not paying his release clause must be untrue?

Seems like there’s a lot more to the Rohl saga that we’ll probably never know.

S.W. staff and players unhappy about his return due to him advising the chairman what players would not

attract a transfer fee and so could get away without fulfilling their contract.

Posted
2 hours ago, FrankieADZ said:


basically he could be heading there on loan or something

 He played for them in the friendly because they were short on numbers, but I think he’s speculating they could use him on loan rather than any concrete interest from them..

Posted
29 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Can’t wait to see how little they offer us

 

 

Probably linked because Walker-Peters move fell through with them. 

 

I'd rather he stays then bin him off in summer. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...