Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sly

Wesley Fofana - He is no more - finished - forgotten.

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Where do people get 100m from??? Sorry, but 80m would be a decent price, however any fee and we would struggle to replace him.

Cost as an unknown was £35m, plus another £9m sell on fee.

 

Leaves us £54 million for a replacement with a week before the season starts. We will also have paid agent fees and signing fees if say £10m.

 

All to leave us probably worse off than we were.

Posted
Just now, splinterdream said:

We don't want to sell do we. That's where £100m comes in. It adequately compensates the club as this transfer is going to mess up our season. He's on a 5 year contract, we can just say no.

Then say no, no price required as he is not in the market this year. :dunno:

Posted
Just now, kenny said:

Cost as an unknown was £35m, plus another £9m sell on fee.

 

Leaves us £54 million for a replacement with a week before the season starts. We will also have paid agent fees and signing fees if say £10m.

 

All to leave us probably worse off than we were.

No price is the answer, he is not in the market.

Posted
1 minute ago, Dahnsouff said:

We all believe he is a generational talent (and a very cheeky boy) but buyers would state recent injuries proneness and try to dump endless loads of exchanges on us. Feels a weird one.

They're free to do that. We let him smash it for a season with us and then they probably have competition to sign him 

Posted
1 minute ago, kenny said:

Cost as an unknown was £35m, plus another £9m sell on fee.

 

Leaves us £54 million for a replacement with a week before the season starts. We will also have paid agent fees and signing fees if say £10m.

 

All to leave us probably worse off than we were.

20% sell on fee to St Etiene?

Posted
26 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

We need 2 CB’s unless you think vesty and Dan are up to it ?? 

 

That's the situation we're already in, so I'm saying this could potentially tick boxes for Brendan

Posted
1 minute ago, kenny said:

Cost as an unknown was £35m, plus another £9m sell on fee.

 

Leaves us £54 million for a replacement with a week before the season starts. We will also have paid agent fees and signing fees if say £10m.

 

All to leave us probably worse off than we were.

Not really....as we would have also got the 35million back that we paid for him minus say the 9million sell on fee. So more like 71million to spend assuming we got 80 million for him.

Posted
1 minute ago, kenny said:

Apparently so. They got a good deal.

Surely that would be 20% of the profit. That's a huge figure if it's for the full transfer fee 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Kierzz said:

Surely that would be 20% of the profit. That's a huge figure if it's for the full transfer fee 

It was only 2 years ago, do you think St Etienne didn’t realise what potential he had before agreeing to the deal 

Edited by HankMarvin
Posted
6 minutes ago, Kierzz said:

Not really....as we would have also got the 35million back that we paid for him minus say the 9million sell on fee. So more like 71million to spend assuming we got 80 million for him.

If he goes I doubt we will get anyone in. The cash will go unspent or we will have our pants down.

 

Anything under £100m now would be terrible business.

Posted
6 minutes ago, splinterdream said:

20% sell on fee to St Etiene?

No where states they have included a sell on fee.

 

The sides came to an agreement on Tuesday, the statement reads, with the fee believed to be €35m (£32m) with €5m (£4.5m) in add-ons.

 

That above was the deal no sell on fee mentioned 

Posted

Problem with selling Fofana is it doesn’t help us really. Yes we would get a fee in, but it’s a squad player we could do without losing and we will have to replace him.

 

We need rid of the likes of Praet, Soumare, Perez and Hamza ideally. 
 

Adding a player into a potential sale wont help either, Colwill looks like he’s off to Brighton so that scuppers that one, and Gallagher for as good as he is, isn’t really what we need. 
 

So this transfer would damage us more than it would help us (apart from the bank). 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Fox85 said:

No where states they have included a sell on fee.

 

The sides came to an agreement on Tuesday, the statement reads, with the fee believed to be €35m (£32m) with €5m (£4.5m) in add-ons.

 

That above was the deal no sell on fee mentioned 

On Friday, St Étienne and Leicester City confirmed the transfer of 19-year-old French central defender Wesley Fofana, in a €35m + €5m bonuses deal, which also includes a 20% sell-on percentage fee clause

 

https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2020/official-leicester-sign-wesley-fofana-from-st-etienne-for-e40m-including-bonuses/

Edited by HankMarvin
Posted
7 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Where do people get 100m from??? Sorry, but 80m would be a decent price, however any fee and we would struggle to replace him.

Because he’s one of the best young players in World football & has got 5yrs left on his contract. If he continues on his current trajectory how much will he be worth in 2/3yrs? 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Problem with selling Fofana is it doesn’t help us really. Yes we would get a fee in, but it’s a squad player we could do without losing and we will have to replace him.

 

We need rid of the likes of Praet, Soumare, Perez and Hamza ideally. 
 

Adding a player into a potential sale wont help either, Colwill looks like he’s off to Brighton so that scuppers that one, and Gallagher for as good as he is, isn’t really what we need. 
 

So this transfer would damage us more than it would help us (apart from the bank). 

Agreed, it just possibly helps us speed up the departures of others whom as it stands might be being offered pitiful deals where we subsidise their wages heavily.

Posted
11 minutes ago, EnderbyFox said:

 

Especially with the whole world knowing we've just pocketed 80m. We will end up having to massively overpay for a replacement.

 

30m bid for Bednarek incoming 

Which is why you do business before you sell? 

 

To a degree I understand what you're saying but it certainly isn't a reason to sell on the cheap, afterall "Leicester City will not be exploited by Premier League rivals"....I'd keep you're mouth shut Bren or get the situations straight with the club before opening your mouth.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Fox85 said:

No where states they have included a sell on fee.

 

The sides came to an agreement on Tuesday, the statement reads, with the fee believed to be €35m (£32m) with €5m (£4.5m) in add-ons.

 

That above was the deal no sell on fee mentioned 

Well let's hope so but I just don't know it's worth letting him go for any fee, just can't see we'll get a decent replacement in time

Posted

He isn’t going anywhere … this is speculation fueled by Chelsea unsettling him .. sky news because they have nothing better to do and love Chelsea … and about 500 foxestalk members wetting themselves … that’s in my opinion … but carry on as it is mildly entertaining to read all this guff 

Posted
8 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

On Friday, St Étienne and Leicester City confirmed the transfer of 19-year-old French central defender Wesley Fofana, in a €35m + €5m bonuses deal, which also includes a 20% sell-on percentage fee clause

 

https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2020/official-leicester-sign-wesley-fofana-from-st-etienne-for-e40m-including-bonuses/

Jesus maybe player swaps would be much better in the long run then 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...