Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Can see us going to some horrid 3 at the back hybrid formation today that allows Rodgers to switch formations constantly without having  make subs.

 

Schmeichel

 

Amartey

Ndidi

Soyuncu

 

Ricardo

KDH

Tielemans

Justin

 

Maddison

 

Barnes

Daka

Problem is Soyuncu cannot play in a back three

Posted
6 minutes ago, Clarkey123 said:

This isn’t a bad shout, with vestergaard hopefully using his one true asset. The thought of Soucek, Rice and Antonio up for corners fills me me terror.

What's that then? He stands 6' 6" but jumps 5' 10".

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

I’d go with a diamond in an attempt to control midfield. Some bigger physical players in, in an attempt to not be bullied as easily. Strike partner for Daka.

 

Schmeichel

 

Ricardo

Amartey

Vestergaard

Justin

 

Ndidi

Soumare

KDH

Maddison

 

Iheanacho

Daka

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'd be tempted to play Perez (he scored 2 in our last win vs West Ham) with Ricardo behind him, it seemed to work well a few seasons ago. Have Justin on the left with Barnes, that worked brilliantly last season. It would at least give us options out wide that we know can work.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Fox92 said:

Well considering loads of people are negative, including yourself, I thought I'd say "we can get a result". Ok!!

Why am I negative? All I was doing was responding to this idiosyncratic phrase which is annoying to say the least.

 

It is pretty obvious every game will end with a result!!

Posted
13 minutes ago, boosmanana said:

I’d go with a diamond in an attempt to control midfield. Some bigger physical players in, in an attempt to not be bullied as easily. Strike partner for Daka.

 

Schmeichel

 

Ricardo

Amartey

Vestergaard

Justin

 

Ndidi

Soumare

KDH

Maddison

 

Iheanacho

Daka

 

 

For a minute then, I thought you had written Vestergard in your starting lineup 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😳

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted (edited)

Bought Soumare and Vestergaard to increase our physicality and neither will play today 🤣

Edited by Chocolate Teapot
Posted

It's silly to think this will be anything but a convincing loss. Whu are a well oiled machine under moyes. I don't think we will go down even if we keep Rodgers  , but if we do, there's clearly  going to be many bad days at the office to come . 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

Bought Soumare and Vestergaard to increase out physicality and neither will play today 🤣

Because neither of them are physical ,pair of pussies, imagine them near Zouma

Edited by Claridge
  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, David Hankey said:

Why am I negative? All I was doing was responding to this idiosyncratic phrase which is annoying to say the least.

 

It is pretty obvious every game will end with a result!!

It’s said, (‘We need a result’) to mean a ‘Positive result’. ie, no to lose. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

I'd be tempted to play Perez (he scored 2 in our last win vs West Ham) with Ricardo behind him, it seemed to work well a few seasons ago. Have Justin on the left with Barnes, that worked brilliantly last season. It would at least give us options out wide that we know can work.

I think we're maybe seeing what Perez has brought to the team since he came here. In a desire to add more attacking influence from both our wingers, we took out our hardest working attacking player who defendeeld from the front. He has his faults that's for sure, but he's played his part in some good team displays in his time here. Teak balance is all off now and we're too easy to get through, and that coincides with a Perez/Albrighton type player not playing regularly.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Daggers said:

 

But we are fickle and lucky to have him. What a bunch of ungrateful gits we are. 18 of those from corners right ? Playing a zonal system which clearly the players struggled with. Apparently it’s a mentality issue of keeping the ball out.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, Larry_LCFC said:

For a minute then, I thought you had written Vestergard in your starting lineup 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😳

I agree give the big lad another go. He couldn’t be any worse than some

of the others. Maybe this game might suit him

more. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Sign of how far we've fallen that we're saying this about West Ham at home ffs.

Yes and West Ham are currently going the other way

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...