Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Lionator said:

Both are actually fairly solid defensively so I don’t think it would be a walkover but no way are they fluking a 0-1 against Madrid or Man City. 

Agreed, the Milan teams know every trick in the book, experienced and would make a really competitive final against Man City. For the opposite reason, that is why I do not want to see a Man City v Brighton FA cup final, Brighton whilst a very good football team would not know how to handle a final, would get done 4-0

Posted
16 minutes ago, HitchinFox said:

Fofana looked so, so out of his depth last night. Did not look like he belongs in a Champions League game at the Bernabeu. 

 

But speaking of out of their depth, Chilwell's red was thanks to Cucurella looking like a League One defender. He's decent on the ball and going forward, but all you seem to need to do against Cucurella is to run past him - with or without the ball. Why they splashed £65m on him is beyond me.  

Glad someone else saw the Cucurella weakness there. Chilwell did what he did as last man, but if Cucurella was more focused and not ball-watching, perhaps there's more cover for Chilwell instead of he having to run from LWB. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Kante has only played 5 games this season, and his last 4 have each been under a different manager!

 

Tuchel in August, then Potter, Salter (caretaker) and Lampard in April. 

Posted

Don't think Chelsea are going to be a serious threat. I know they put down silly money and you think eventually enough will stick but they really do seem absolutely clueless with it.

Posted
4 hours ago, Dan LCFC said:

Don't think Chelsea are going to be a serious threat. I know they put down silly money and you think eventually enough will stick but they really do seem absolutely clueless with it.

Think this will take a lot of fixing. Far too many players currently, not going to be easy to shift lots, they are in for a difficult time.

Posted

Chelsea starting with 1 recognised attacker. 1.5 if you consider Gallagher as a goal threat. No strikers. All defence. Come on Real, rub Lampard's face into the dirt. 

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Chelsea have just got no one up front.

Havertz IS NOT a striker.

Kante is often the furthest forward!

If any team need a recognised striker, it’s Chelsea. Something they’ll surely rectify in the summer.

Posted

Been quite impressed with that 1st half from Chelsea. Miss anymore chances and you feel like Madrid will get one on the counter though

Guest Col city fan
Posted
16 minutes ago, BKLFox said:

Chelsea spent over half a billion £ & I’m thinking where are they 🤷‍♂️ 

They are just bizarre.

They’ve signed Enzo to win the ball back, Mudryk to supply the crosses and have no strikers to give it to. All the time spending huge amounts TWICE on Lukaku who is on loan yet again!

Talk about how to not run a football club.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

How on earth does Lampard put this team out tonight, genuinely thinking they’ll score enough goals?

🤷‍♂️

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...