Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
dbtcity

Harry Souttar

By dbtcity, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Nicolo Barella

Nicolo Barella

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
36 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

Stoke forum has the deal as £18m + Iversen

That's basically giving Iversen, last seasons best Championship goalie, away for free. Terrible bit of business. If Iversen is going permanently we should get it down to at least 10 mil.

  • Like 15
Bob Weasel Fox

Bob Weasel Fox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nicolo Barella said:

That's basically giving Iversen, last seasons best Championship goalie, away for free. Terrible bit of business. If Iversen is going permanently we should get it down to at least 10 mil.

To be fair Iversen should be playing for City and we could give them Ward instead and I mean literally give them Ward aswell the useless lump

  • Haha 1
Shane

Shane

Posted
Posted

one poster on the stoke forum reckons the 18m rumour might come from an article which quoted 17.6m Australian dollars (10m pounds)

  • Thanks 3
fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted

For Iverson, if it means he plays, I think he’ll jump at the chance. Just a shame we don’t offer him a chance. £10m +. Iverson sounds believable. £18m +  Iverson sounds a bad deal. 
 

I can’t see us getting a replacement keeper now, I think that’ll happen in the summer, if at any time. If Souttar does come in, then he’ll have to hit the ground running, which will be a tough ask. But this is the sort of signing we usually look at. Let’s hope the new head of recruitment is switched on and pulls out some great signings. Unlike before. 

Nicolo Barella

Nicolo Barella

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Shane said:

one poster on the stoke forum reckons the 18m rumour might come from an article which quoted 17.6m Australian dollars (10m pounds)

Much better. If Iversen won't get a chance let him go, get Stolarcyzk in for the rest of the season, get Souttar for cheap, and then have enough to spend on a RW. Then we'll sign a new keeper in the summer (Lafont inshallah)

  • Like 1
Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Nicolo Barella said:

Much better. If Iversen won't get a chance let him go, get Stolarcyzk in for the rest of the season, get Souttar for cheap, and then have enough to spend on a RW. Then we'll sign a new keeper in the summer (Lafont inshallah)

Lafont is the ideal replacement. 
 

This deal for Souttar makes sense, however I can’t say I rate him as highly as others do. 

  • Like 1
Mike1983

Mike1983

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Sly said:

Lafont is the ideal replacement. 
 

This deal for Souttar makes sense, however I can’t say I rate him as highly as others do. 

Any news on the Lafont situation? Seems to have dried off.

Scotch

Scotch

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, weller54 said:

😂😂😂😂....have I missed something?

Screenshot_20230123_145322_com.android.chrome_edit_693324888929102.jpg

Where did you get an extract from Jannik's diary? 

  • Haha 4
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

I think the total deal will be 10m + Iversen for Souttar. Have to say I will be gutted to see Iversen leave as I firmly believe he is a better keeper than Ward. 

We gotta hope that the club already have someone lined up in the summer to replace ward 

Babylon

Babylon

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Nicolo Barella said:

That's basically giving Iversen, last seasons best Championship goalie, away for free. Terrible bit of business. If Iversen is going permanently we should get it down to at least 10 mil.

Was he? 

  • Like 3
AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, TrickyTrevLeftPeg said:

Unless we are after La Font aswell. Can't see it myself but Souttar, RW (Tete) and GK (La Font) would be ideal and help us long term for a rebuild.

Helvetica or Comic Sans?

  • Haha 2
Babylon

Babylon

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said:

No.

 

He was decent for Preston in the way that Mark Bunn was decent for us.

 

Iverson is probably on a par with Ward in terms of ability.

I knew the answer, probably shouldn’t have put the question mark. :D

westernpark

westernpark

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said:

No.

 

He was decent for Preston in the way that Mark Bunn was decent for us.

 

Iverson is probably on a par with Ward in terms of ability.

Yes because Mark Bunn played 50 odd games for us and won player of the season. 

FoxinNotts

FoxinNotts

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said:

No.

 

He was decent for Preston in the way that Mark Bunn was decent for us.

 

Iverson is probably on a par with Ward in terms of ability.

Mark Bunn is an oven ready replacement keeper

  • Haha 2
westernpark

westernpark

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

You sure abut this?

Yes I am sure that Bunn did not complete 50 games for us and win player of the season. He played three, saved a penalty at Bristol Rovers. However, Iversen did win player of the season at Preston and has played around 50 games for them. The point was, it was a poor comparison between the two. 

  • Like 1
hackneyfox

hackneyfox

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, westernpark said:

Yes I am sure that Bunn did not complete 50 games for us and win player of the season. He played three, saved a penalty at Bristol Rovers. However, Iversen did win player of the season at Preston and has played around 50 games for them. The point was, it was a poor comparison between the two. 

Oh I see what you mean own.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...