Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Will1981

Mads Hermansen

By Will1981, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

honeybradger

honeybradger

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, 5waller5 said:


He’s elite, and wouldn’t be with us if we got relegated. 
 

Whilst not quite as good Jakub is a really good keeper. So if £50m in Jan meant all of it spent on 3 permanent and 2 loans for a striker, a CB, RB, CAM, and winger, I’d cash in now and wish him well

But then if jakub gets injured we have to play Ward.

  • Like 1
Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

But then if jakub gets injured we have to play Ward.

I would say 2 keepers is plenty, they rarely injured and if they both were we would likely be allowed to make an emergency signing.

 

The problem of course we have a DoF who cant shift him or cant tear up his contract.

5waller5

5waller5

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

But then if jakub gets injured we have to play Ward.

I think I’d have to include a loan keeper in that £50m!! Ward simply cannot play otherwise any plan fails

LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted

Weird that he was being monitored and touch and go for Wolves and Liverpool (?) but now is categorically ruled out of Man City a few days ahead (I suppose it is a short turn around rather than one weekend to the next).

 

Possibly the injury has worsened. Or we are happy with JS being back.

 

I don’t buy the January transfer stuff but it is weird how he seems to be getting further away from a return.

Simonb

Simonb

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LCFCJohn said:

Weird that he was being monitored and touch and go for Wolves and Liverpool (?) but now is categorically ruled out of Man City a few days ahead (I suppose it is a short turn around rather than one weekend to the next).

 

Possibly the injury has worsened. Or we are happy with JS being back.

 

I don’t buy the January transfer stuff but it is weird how he seems to be getting further away from a return.

Genuinely just imagine we've practically written off Liverpool and Man City and just don't see the point in risking him getting injured any further.

 

They may even leave him out at Villa and then obviously QPR and bring him back in for Palace 

Mike1983

Mike1983

Posted
Posted
On 27/12/2024 at 07:18, LCFCJohn said:

Weird that he was being monitored and touch and go for Wolves and Liverpool (?) but now is categorically ruled out of Man City a few days ahead (I suppose it is a short turn around rather than one weekend to the next).

 

Possibly the injury has worsened. Or we are happy with JS being back.

 

I don’t buy the January transfer stuff but it is weird how he seems to be getting further away from a return.

Having the same thoughts. If he's not back for the Villa game, I'd start worrying he's pushing for a January move.

Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted
On 27/12/2024 at 06:18, LCFCJohn said:

Weird that he was being monitored and touch and go for Wolves and Liverpool (?) but now is categorically ruled out of Man City a few days ahead (I suppose it is a short turn around rather than one weekend to the next).

 

Possibly the injury has worsened. Or we are happy with JS being back.

 

I don’t buy the January transfer stuff but it is weird how he seems to be getting further away from a return.

It will be because Stolarczyk is back. There’s no need to rush him back early for the sake of losing him for a full season. We rush him back and he gets a season ending injury, we would be in a mess.

  • Like 1
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Lesta2014 said:

Feeling like smokescreen for a sale now we’re apparently close to a PSR fail. 

A sale in Jan won’t help our 23/24 accounts which is what we’re at risk of a sanction for this season . 

  • Like 2
Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, st albans fox said:

A sale in Jan won’t help our 23/24 accounts which is what we’re at risk of a sanction for this season . 

Yes, but may provide the best return on his investment, and provided needed funds for other players.

iancognito

iancognito

Posted
Posted
On 29/12/2024 at 12:24, FrankieADZ said:

Yeah but who's paying what we'd want in January 

Nobody would pay what we want in the summer either. Our financial situation means anything we get is take it or leave it. As we found out over the last two summer windows, we're not in a strong position to negotiate.

VLC86

VLC86

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, alanf0x said:

Hence why we are in the market for a number 2 keeper, as cover for our current number 2

As our previous number 2 keeper was actual number 2.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...