Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, CrazyKopCorner said:

Get him gone too - missed the start 

Oh - so you came to have a pop at the keeper who wasnt even playing!!! Love it.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Dropped for no real reason (I.e. begovic is worse)

 

Looked gutted post Pompey. One of only players I think we won’t have to sell and isn’t on big money, I don’t utterly loathe 

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, eblair said:

Dropped for no real reason (I.e. begovic is worse)

 

Looked gutted post Pompey. One of only players I think we won’t have to sell and isn’t on big money, I don’t utterly loathe 

But I thought we were blaming him for the Portsmouth goal, and for not being commanding enough generally on crosses and corners? 

Posted

Jakub just doesn't look to have progressed at all, he's massively regressed. From the eye test alone, the Jakub that stepped up when Mads got injured is lightyears ahead of the one we have seen for much of this season, i'm sure statistically it would be hard to compare, I was fully expecting Jakub to really step up as the #1 and at least take the burden of having to find a #1 goalkeeper away from us for the considerable future. 
He's obviously good enough for League 1, and in a better side is an upper Championship keeper who could still step up to the top flight in future, but I think he's a player that has suffered in a similar way that Justin did, if he goes to another club he may thrive and improve, with this ownership, and this squad, and this lack of culture building from the management/coaches, he's regressing. 

If the next manager is a leader and brings in some real leadership players, Jakub could easily become that player that we don't have to worry about. 

  • Like 4
Posted

Hope for him he gets a move with a year left on his contract but won’t really make us much. I think he’ll go on to do well elsewhere where it’s not a toxic cesspit. 
 

His card is marked with supporters though so he’s done here. 

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

He's not going to suddenly improve, he's a bad goalkeeper just like the other two. Unfortunately we're stuck with three poor goalkeepers. Absolute joke, for such a vital position, we bring in a 36 year old and Blackpool's third goalkeeper. 

Posted

Don't rate him at all, needed replacing and he's still here. LCFC all over.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

He's par for this level, but either way, there's no way we could afford his wages. Any 'legacy' player apart from the youth will be on too much for us to carry.

Edited by totbl
Posted

You've got to take a long hard look at yourself if you're deemed to be not as good as Alex McCarthy.

 

I liked Jakub in his early career, I thought he had a lot of potential, but he's never really improved on the glaring weaknesses in his game. 

Posted
1 minute ago, totbl said:

He's par for this level, but either way, there's no way we could afford his wages. Any 'legacy' player apart from the youth will be on too much for us to carry.

I beg your pardon

Posted
2 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Just when you think you might be getting away from Mccarthy starting, Stolarczyk basically gifts him his spot back. 

You seriously blaming him for that last goal? 

Posted
Just now, Blue-fox said:

I beg your pardon

this is his level. Ignore this game, he'd do a better job than whatshisname from the last few games. But regardless, his wage will be too expensive for what he is. 

Posted

He’s better than McCarthy. He actually makes saves. Saved a point blank shot from Akbom and a one on one with the same striker. Balls just roll past  McCarthy into the net (see both goals v Burton.) McCarthy is Ward V2. 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...