Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Leicesterpool said:

Some saying the deal is off for now for Rangers. My guess it's partly to do with wages, can't see Rangers being able to match even half his wages at Leicester. Saying that rather Coady stayed much rather see Vestergaard and Faes out the door.

So Coady only entertained this move to get out of the bleep test today. The lazy basta**.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

So Coady only entertained this move to get out of the bleep test today. The lazy basta**.

If it's true re wages that will apply to all our squad.  We will be stuck with a lot of them, because of this.

  • Like 1
Posted

He has arrived at training today, so clearly not close, I read also he has asked for 3-4 years. Good idea while it lasted but he’s not going anywhere.
 

Awful signing, overpaid and just another mistake in along line of them. He will stay. Even though he has wanted out twice. Horrible. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Leicesterpool said:

Some saying the deal is off for now for Rangers. My guess it's partly to do with wages, can't see Rangers being able to match even half his wages at Leicester. Saying that rather Coady stayed much rather see Vestergaard and Faes out the door.

It’ll be the same situation, other club not willing to match the stupid wages and us trying our best to haggle our way out of a sale to avoid a balance sheet loss on the fee. Buyer pulls out and lose out anyway. Vestergaard could easily have left but didn’t fancy it. 
 

What’s annoying is this better not prevent Ben Nelson getting into the team. 

  • Like 2
Posted

If they want him and we can't agree a deal we ought to look at a season long loan. Anything we get for him in wages or fee is better than him staying.

Posted

I doubt very much Rangers will offer him anything like he's earning here. So it's hard to see him going but I hope he does and we start afresh with a new pairing at CB.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Clever Fox said:

I doubt very much Rangers will offer him anything like he's earning here. So it's hard to see him going but I hope he does and we start afresh with a new pairing at CB.

Cant we just pay the difference?

Posted

Usually before agreeing a fee, the buying club will have had some degree of conversation with the players representatives to discuss current and expected wages, contract lengths etc and if given positive feedback then both parties would agree for the buying club to engage with current club to start negotiating a fee. 
 

I still think this will get done, I think there will be compromise and Coady will get a 2 year deal with option for a 3rd which is triggered after he plays a specified number of games. 

Posted
1 hour ago, surrifox said:

Good start for RM - his new club can’t even strike a deal for his first signing which is hardly an ambitious one 

It's strange because RM likes his defenders to be good on the ball and he's probably the worst out of all of our defenders at passing, even Faes has a decent long diagonal in him. Vestergaard would unironically be a decent signing for the SPL under Martin.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, surrifox said:

Good start for RM - his new club can’t even strike a deal for his first signing which is hardly an ambitious one 

Probably a hard deal to sort to be fair with the contract we put him on here...

Posted
4 minutes ago, James_lcfc said:

Probably a hard deal to sort to be fair with the contract we put him on here...

Do we know what he's on?

Posted
11 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

I think he is on £70k a week now we have been relegated

And to put that into perspective, Rangers have never given a player more than 30k a week. 

Posted

If we are stuck with them, these ****ing clowns better work harder than ever to get us up first time. 
 

I’m more concerned that we are stuck with Soumare and the new manager plays him. If can’t see Rohl playing him after seeing what he doesn’t do.  Thankfully he has a stats background not just cliches about experience.

Posted
2 minutes ago, TommyK said:

What the actual ****

Percy came out with an article last summer saying a player signed in summer of 2023 who ended up being a squad player was originally on £70k and went up to £100k once we were promoted

 

Made it quite obvious that it was Coady

Posted

Not going to be able to get rid of a  lot of these useless lumps due to wages I suspect, Rudders really has to go.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, moore_94 said:

Percy came out with an article last summer saying a player signed in summer of 2023 who ended up being a squad player was originally on £70k and went up to £100k once we were promoted

 

Made it quite obvious that it was Coady

If ever there was proof that there's been a huge brain drain of football knowledge at LCFC the Coady signing was it. 

 

Had become out of favour at Wolves in 2022 (aged 29) and went on loan at Everton where he failed to impress and they didn't want him either. Now 30 years old, 1 year left on his deal, no one after him and we pop up and pay a reported £7.5m for him. 

 

Any recruitment person worth his salt would have known: he's not that good, he's not worth that fee, he's not worth that salary. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

If ever there was proof that there's been a huge brain drain of football knowledge at LCFC the Coady signing was it. 

 

Had become out of favour at Wolves in 2022 (aged 29) and went on loan at Everton where he failed to impress and they didn't want him either. Now 30 years old, 1 year left on his deal, no one after him and we pop up and pay a reported £7.5m for him. 

 

Any recruitment person worth his salt would have known: he's not that good, he's not worth that fee, he's not worth that salary. 

 

Edited by Bablemikey
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...