Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Izzy said:

Blyth and Sunderland running around like nutters :D

Newcastle looking fit too, clearly been in training.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, goose2010 said:

To be fair when I've just been to vote they were shocked I hadn't brought my own.... 

But isn't the suggestion that "they" rub out your pencil vote if "they" don't like who you've voted for? 

Posted
1 minute ago, Col city fan said:

Discussion around whether people have really voted for Labour or voted against the Tories.

That’ll come out more as we go along 

I’d say mostly against tories. 

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, kingkisnorbo said:

I think Sunak gets the boot and the party move further to right to hoover back up the voters/members that have moved over to Reform. Shadow cabinet made up of the far right leaners like Braverman. 

Yeah, quite possibly.

 

It remains to be seen whether or not that (or a reiteration of Reform, whichever) will perform better at the next election, depending on events.

Posted
2 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said:

No ad-breaks, all star cast...

 

But they also have Nadine ****ing Dories and Kwasi Kwarteng :nigel:

That's what makes it superb, she definitely said Cameron kept Farage at bay, sure thing lol

Posted

Labour wining 410 seats with under 40% of the vote

 

Shows how effective Starmer has been in the marginals and wining the voters that matter compared to magic grandpa

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said:

No ad-breaks, all star cast...

 

But they also have Nadine ****ing Dories and Kwasi Kwarteng :nigel:

But Anne Widdecombe looks like being the first politician to die live on air, that’s worth something

  • Haha 4
Posted
1 minute ago, Col city fan said:

Reform look like getting 13 seats which is a bigger share of the vote (not sure how that works?) than the Lib Dems

You're not sure how that works? Did you not question the SNP having more seats than the Lib Dems for the last 10 years?

The percentage of the vote you get nationally, and the number of constituencies you win aren't the same thing Col, what is playing dumb on here gaining you?

  • Like 1
Guest Col city fan
Posted
2 minutes ago, LCFCCHRIS said:

I’d say mostly against tories. 

I’d agree, but it’ll become more clear as the night unfolds I guess.

People very very angry with the Tories.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

Reform look like getting 13 seats which is a bigger share of the vote (not sure how that works?) than the Lib Dems

it's about national swing basically. if we had a functional democratic system which apportioned power in relation to support rather than First Past the Post which is a shit or bust system, then reform would get more seats than the lib Dems on the vote share, but under FPTP they'll probably get a decent amount of votes nationwide but not enough to concentrate into a large number of seats, where as the lib dems support is concentrated into a few constituencies so they'll keep the seats they were in/gain a few where they were in second 

  • Like 1
Guest Col city fan
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Mark_w said:

You're not sure how that works? Did you not question the SNP having more seats than the Lib Dems for the last 10 years?

The percentage of the vote you get nationally, and the number of constituencies you win aren't the same thing Col, what is playing dumb on here gaining you?

Eh? I’ve never mentioned the SNP or the Lib Dems that I can recollect?

Genuinely don’t know how ‘ the share’ thing works

Edited by Col city fan
Guest Col city fan
Posted
1 minute ago, The Doctor said:

it's about national swing basically. if we had a functional democratic system which apportioned power in relation to support rather than First Past the Post which is a shit or bust system, then reform would get more seats than the lib Dems on the vote share, but under FPTP they'll probably get a decent amount of votes nationwide but not enough to concentrate into a large number of seats, where as the lib dems support is concentrated into a few constituencies so they'll keep the seats they were in/gain a few where they were in second 

👍

Posted
Just now, David Hankey said:

No surprise in what the exit polls are telling us. In fact it would be a complete surprise if Labour didn't win by a landslide.

But some of us wanted to see them totally wiped out! Still take the result any day though. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...