Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
ramboacdc

Danny Ward

By ramboacdc, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
OntarioFox

OntarioFox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
5 hours ago, em9999 said:

Both he and Micheal Jackson. Have worn gloves for no apparent reason 

Michael only wore one, and he was still far more effective on the big stage

  • Haha 7
Fox42

Fox42

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, sulfoxide said:

Unkind

And any Danny Ward related thread isn’t? lol 

  • Haha 1
leicesterisme

leicesterisme

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, FoxinNotts said:

Some of the comments on here are (as usual) embarrassing.

He's not a Premier League first choice, this is true.

He'd do very well for a EFL club. Very well.

I'd love to see the likes of Wrexham come in for him. He was there as a youth product. He'd be the difference between them winning the league or not. Would be a real coup for them.

Good luck to him. The epitome of a confidence player. 

 

You still need to be able to use your hands in the EFL, that part doesn't change so I struggle to see how he would do well. 

Uncle Monty

Uncle Monty

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, FrankieADZ said:

we talking weight or money,

 

cos it could work for both:ph34r:

Gary Taylor-Fletcher has entered the chat 

  • Haha 1
jayfox26

jayfox26

Posted
Posted (edited)

£50k a week amounts to around £2.5m a year. I'm no expert in contracts etc but if we could get a team to pay us £2.5m to  pay up his contract, then he basically leaves on a free, can negotiate a new contract at a lower wage with another club. Could a team loan him for £2.5m, covering his wages and then they just sign him for free next summer? Am I being too optimistic that anyone would pay £2.5m for him? We just need to find anyway to get rid of him. 

Edited by jayfox26
  • Like 2
Gubbins

Gubbins

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, jayfox26 said:

£50k a week amounts to around £2.5m a year. I'm no expert in contracts etc but if we could get a team to pay us £2.5m to  pay up his contract, then he basically leaves on a free, can negotiate a new contract at a lower wage with another club. Could a team loan him for £2.5m, covering his wages and then they just sign him for free next summer? Am I being too optimistic that anyone would pay £2.5m for him? We just need to find anyway to get rid of him. 

You're being relatively optimistic if you think anyone is paying £2.5 for the hopeless prat let alone £2.5m!

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, jayfox26 said:

£50k a week amounts to around £2.5m a year. I'm no expert in contracts etc but if we could get a team to pay us £2.5m to  pay up his contract, then he basically leaves on a free, can negotiate a new contract at a lower wage with another club. Could a team loan him for £2.5m, covering his wages and then they just sign him for free next summer? Am I being too optimistic that anyone would pay £2.5m for him? We just need to find anyway to get rid of him. 

Or they could (but won’t) take him on loan and pay nothing 

ACF

ACF

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, jayfox26 said:

£50k a week amounts to around £2.5m a year. I'm no expert in contracts etc but if we could get a team to pay us £2.5m to  pay up his contract, then he basically leaves on a free, can negotiate a new contract at a lower wage with another club. Could a team loan him for £2.5m, covering his wages and then they just sign him for free next summer? Am I being too optimistic that anyone would pay £2.5m for him? We just need to find anyway to get rid of him. 


:blink:

 

If he leaves for £2.5m, that does not equal leaving on a free. He would leave for the £2.5m, then we have the savings in wages on top of that.

 

If he leaves on a £1 transfer, we would just save the wages.

 

 

Edited by ACF
jayfox26

jayfox26

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ACF said:


:blink:

 

If he leaves for £2.5m, that does not equal leaving on a free. He would leave for the £2.5m, then we have the savings in wages on top of that.

 

If he leaves on a £1 transfer, we would just save the wages.

 

 

If we give him the £2.5m to pay up his contract, then technically he leaves for free. The issue isn't finding someone to take him, the issue is he wants his money for the last year of his contract, which no other club will pay and it seems the only way we could get rid of him, is us paying up his contract 

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted

The only way he will leave for lesser money involves football reasons i.e. he wants regular football.   If he is happy to waste another year here, then fine he has a lucrative contract.

 

Whoever gave him the contract extension, and if still at the Club, needs tar and feathering at half-time at the Spuds game.

Trav Le Bleu

Trav Le Bleu

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

 

Whoever gave him the contract extension, and if still at the Club, needs tar and feathering at half-time at the Spuds game.

Surely we should wait until the stadium expansion for that.

  • Haha 2
Bluearmyfox28

Bluearmyfox28

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, jayfox26 said:

£50k a week amounts to around £2.5m a year. I'm no expert in contracts etc but if we could get a team to pay us £2.5m to  pay up his contract, then he basically leaves on a free, can negotiate a new contract at a lower wage with another club. Could a team loan him for £2.5m, covering his wages and then they just sign him for free next summer? Am I being too optimistic that anyone would pay £2.5m for him? We just need to find anyway to get rid of him. 

Even if anyone was crazy enough to give us £2.5m, realistically no one is giving him more than £25k a week unless he’s signing as a free agent to be 3rd choice homegrown keeper at a top club. 
 

Would you accept a move to half your salary? I know I wouldn’t. Only got ourselves to blame on this one.

jayfox26

jayfox26

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Bluearmyfox28 said:

Even if anyone was crazy enough to give us £2.5m, realistically no one is giving him more than £25k a week unless he’s signing as a free agent to be 3rd choice homegrown keeper at a top club. 
 

Would you accept a move to half your salary? I know I wouldn’t. Only got ourselves to blame on this one.

He's going to have to accept a lower salary from next summer regardless. He wouldn't be losing anything as he'd be having his contract paid up by us 

Steve Earle

Steve Earle

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, dorsetboy said:

Be sad to see him go.underated keeper who was never given a fair chance to shine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Said no one ever

Remembering that night at Molineux now makes me almost physically sick!

Still, it was fun while it lasted, and always good to beat the Yam Yams.

ACF

ACF

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, jayfox26 said:

If we give him the £2.5m to pay up his contract, then technically he leaves for free. The issue isn't finding someone to take him, the issue is he wants his money for the last year of his contract, which no other club will pay and it seems the only way we could get rid of him, is us paying up his contract 

But why would we pay up his contract, what benefit would that give us? It doesn’t give us financial headroom to get anyone else, we lose a player. He’s shit, we don’t want him here, but there’s literally no benefit to paying him out.

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted

Interestingly FFP in League One is far more relaxed and is based on wages to turnover ratio and nothing to do with transfer fees. Also cash injections from owners can count towards revenue for this.

 

We should be offering Wrexham the chance to buy him for £2.5m and we subsidise his wages for 12 months and get him as far away from here as possible.

HoustonFox

HoustonFox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ACF said:

But why would we pay up his contract, what benefit would that give us? It doesn’t give us financial headroom to get anyone else, we lose a player. He’s shit, we don’t want him here, but there’s literally no benefit to paying him out.

Depends if we also pay other expenses, like to feed him at Seagrave...  [insert your own joke about amount of food he eats]

  • Haha 1
HoustonFox

HoustonFox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

Interestingly FFP in League One is far more relaxed and is based on wages to turnover ratio and nothing to do with transfer fees. Also cash injections from owners can count towards revenue for this.

 

We should be offering Wrexham the chance to buy him for £2.5m and we subsidise his wages for 12 months and get him as far away from here as possible.

you could remove the m after the 2.5, Ric Lad! 

  • Haha 2
jayfox26

jayfox26

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, ACF said:

But why would we pay up his contract, what benefit would that give us? It doesn’t give us financial headroom to get anyone else, we lose a player. He’s shit, we don’t want him here, but there’s literally no benefit to paying him out.

My previous message said, if we could get another team to pay us £2.5m, then he basically leaves for free but we haven't had to pay him to leave. The other team has ultimately paid up his contract. It's not likely to happen anyway, he'll stay here as 3rd choice and then leave for free next summer. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...