Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
StanSP

Premier League 2024/25

By StanSP, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

murphy

murphy

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, suffolk fox said:

Today we ain't making up 9 points!!

True.  Wolves could put their feet up and not play another game.  We won't get 20 points let alone 26.

  • Like 3
trooky

trooky

Posted
Posted

Ipswich have a net spend of £120 million, haven't won in 2025, didn't sacked McKenna who was being linked to Man U and Chelsea in the summer and yet still on the same points as us. 

 

Just shows who hard this leaquebis is for the newly promoted teams. 

  • Like 2
Richmondfox

Richmondfox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, trooky said:

Ipswich have a net spend of £120 million, haven't won in 2025, didn't sacked McKenna who was being linked to Man U and Chelsea in the summer and yet still on the same points as us. 

 

Just shows who hard this leaquebis is for the newly promoted teams. 

And hasn’t lost the fans. 

  • Like 1
Hinckleyfox

Hinckleyfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, trooky said:

Ipswich have a net spend of £120 million, haven't won in 2025, didn't sacked McKenna who was being linked to Man U and Chelsea in the summer and yet still on the same points as us. 

 

Just shows who hard this leaquebis is for the newly promoted teams. 

I was just coming in here to say a similar thing. Just got me thinking what difference would it actually have made had we “got it right”? We’ll never know of course and it doesn’t excuse the sheer ineptitude of the whole club, but as you say it shows what a closed shop the league is now. 
 

DezFox

DezFox

Posted
Posted
On 11/03/2025 at 10:24, urban.spaceman said:

Probably the most ambitious part of that stadium is that one of the pictures has them 3-0 up

To be fair though that’s  when we play there.

Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, trooky said:

Ipswich have a net spend of £120 million, haven't won in 2025, didn't sacked McKenna who was being linked to Man U and Chelsea in the summer and yet still on the same points as us. 

 

Just shows who hard this leaquebis is for the newly promoted teams. 

They were league 1 once you know.

Stadt

Stadt

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, trooky said:

Ipswich have a net spend of £120 million, haven't won in 2025, didn't sacked McKenna who was being linked to Man U and Chelsea in the summer and yet still on the same points as us. 

 

Just shows who hard this leaquebis is for the newly promoted teams. 

We weren’t newly promoted in 22/23 - it works both ways and we f ucked both.

southfox66

southfox66

Posted
Posted

I was at the Southampton Wolves game yesterday as I live that way, I hate to say it while they were getting a lot of stick off the fans, they were actually way more adventurous than us going forward and even given the points difference between us, they are actually better set up then us and probably lacking a decent striker. Based on what I saw if they can come straight back they will be better prepared for the premier next time than we will be. For us it going to take two cycles of going up and down and back, that is only if we clear out squad at the end of the season and start bringing some young players into the squad as long term development programme.

 

  • Like 2
Number 6

Number 6

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, southfox66 said:

I was at the Southampton Wolves game yesterday as I live that way, I hate to say it while they were getting a lot of stick off the fans, they were actually way more adventurous than us going forward and even given the points difference between us, they are actually better set up then us and probably lacking a decent striker. Based on what I saw if they can come straight back they will be better prepared for the premier next time than we will be. For us it going to take two cycles of going up and down and back, that is only if we clear out squad at the end of the season and start bringing some young players into the squad as long term development programme.

 

For the relegated clubs it all depends on the summer. Even last summer we came up as the better of the three and almost immediately had the gap closed by Enzo and KDH leaving.

 

This summer could see us and Saints looking for a new manager, plus players like Delap, Hutchinson, Dibbling, Ramsdale, Hermansen, El Khannous could all be subject to transfer activity. We won't know which of the three is best placed until the window shuts. I'd have Ipswich as favourites if deciding today, but there's a lot of change before we'll know.

Stadt

Stadt

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, foxfanazer said:

Yeah £50m absolute minimum imo

We’ll contrive to get about £36m and pay £11m for Jorgensen or something equally braindead 

  • Like 1
KingsX

KingsX

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, foxfanazer said:

Chelsea look so bad

So bad they look about 3 levels above us.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...