Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ruud spoke about the window today and specifically mentioned looking at some loan options as well as permanent transfers, so it sounds to me like he’s confident enough that he would be leaving. 
 

Edouard clearly hasn’t worked out, I was excited when he came as I liked him at Celtic and felt that a run and some confidence we may get him back to his best, but for 90k a week he’s an expensive paper weight at the moment, best of luck to him if he goes, will score bags of goals over there. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said:

Ruud spoke about the window today and specifically mentioned looking at some loan options

Doesn’t mean he’s leaving as we can still loan players just not currently from the premier league 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, jammie82uk said:

Doesn’t mean he’s leaving as we can still loan players just not currently from the premier league 

I was under the impression we could only have 2 loan players registered in the league but can sign up to 4, so I assumed that meant Edouard was going, so can we sign a loan player from spain for example and register him even if Edouard stays?

  • Like 2
Posted

Loan rules for the Premier League.

 

In the Premier League, the regulations governing player loans are as follows:

• Simultaneous Loans: A club may have no more than two players on loan at any given time.

 

• Seasonal Loan Limit: Throughout a single season, a club can register up to four loan players.

 

• Club-Specific Loans: A club cannot loan more than one player from the same club simultaneously.

 

• Transfer Window Acquisitions: Players acquired in the same transfer window cannot be loaned to another Premier League club during that window.

 

• Goalkeeper Loans: A club may loan out only one of its goalkeepers to another Premier League club at a time.

 

It’s important to note that these rules apply to loans between Premier League clubs and other English clubs. Loans from clubs in other national associations do not count towards these quotas.

  • Like 1
Posted

There must be a ‘no early termination’ clause otherwise why are we keeping him here?

 

Surely the pecking order goes - Vardy, Daka, Ayew, Edouard, Cannon (recall).

 

No chance he is getting even on the bench so why is he still here?

Posted
34 minutes ago, The boy Linacre said:

Just mentioned on Sky Sports Transfer Show Atlanta Utd? Had offered £15m for him, surely Palace will snap their hands off, especially as we rolled over so kindly last night.

Unfortunately they also offered £18m for Latte Lath but they only want the 1 with Latte Lath their preferred choice, stinks of using OE to hurry LL up sadly 

Posted
2 minutes ago, BKLFox said:

Unfortunately they also offered £18m for Latte Lath but they only want the 1 with Latte Lath their preferred choice, stinks of using OE to hurry LL up sadly 

And we’ll set the rest of our window up on the basis that OE is going ………

Posted

Every day this guy is really annoying me and some of isn't his fault. 

 

He's been useless and he's taking a loan slot up and we can't send him back without a fine. We could seriously use that loan spot right now, but we can't. 

 

Whoever signed this off is a dunce. Oh wait....

Posted

struggling prem team is willing to lend another soon to be struggling team a striker.

 

even with no other facts, stats or anything else, this was unlikely to be a good deal for us.

 

his presence offends me.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

Can't see what the fuss is about..Just deregister him. 

 

It's a mistake (again). But why compound it? Suck it up and move along. 

Not the Rudkin way. I'm guessing there is a fee to cancel it and we don't want to pay it, shock horror

 

Or we know hes moving on so when he's gone we can get a proper loan in 

Edited by fox_favourite
Posted
1 minute ago, fox_favourite said:

Not the Rudkin way. I'm guessing there is a fee to cancel it and we don't want to pay it. Or we know hes moving on so when he's gone we can get a proper loan in 

Ever painted a room and then looked at the colour and thought, FFS?

 

Buy 3 pots more, new rollers and spend 48 hours   painting the gaff all over again? Or suffer for six years in a turquoise hell hole til it's ready for a new lick?

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

Ever painted a room and then looked at the colour and thought, FFS?

 

Buy 3 pots more, new rollers and spend 48 hours   painting the gaff all over again? Or suffer for six years in a turquoise hell hole til it's ready for a new lick?

Turquoise would have been a bold choice that just might have worked with the right accessories.

 

This is where the analogy falls down for me :D

 

Edited by Jobyfox

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...