MOTD - penalty shout!

[Spudulike]

4 minutes ago, Winchesterfox said:

Didn’t look like a pen to me, and I had a good view from the Kop.  Mav’s too close to the defender.  I wouldn’t be happy if a pen was given against us for that.  

It's about consistency though. Could accept if it was the same in every incident, for every club. 

[SpacedX]

11 hours ago, lozzyblue fox said:

They must have been told not to high light it.

The FA know they are in the wrong.

[Collymore]

If it's the one on the first half I remember thinking it wasn't a penalty and would have been livid if given against us. His hand had a natural movement. 

 

[grobyfox1990]

Never ever a pen. The victims on this forum would be crying if that was given against us, and justifying it as the reason we should sue Man City for £500m 

[Spudulike]

Just now, grobyfox1990 said:

Never ever a pen. The victims on this forum would be crying if that was given against us, and justifying it as the reason we should sue Man City for £500m 

That's true but sometimes it is a pen. No one knows what handball is anymore.

[Collymore]

1 minute ago, Spudulike said:

That's true but sometimes it is a pen. No one knows what handball is anymore.

I thought the law changed to say that the ball hitting the hand is now a penalty even if it's obvious that the person isn't moving their hand towards the ball - it's whether it's in an unatural position or not. 

 

The one yesterday his arm swigging in a natural way to how he was moving so it wasn't a pen. 

[dayday]

3 hours ago, Saxondale said:

You’re never gonna get a penalty when most of the crowd and most of the players don’t even shout for it.

I shout for everything even if i know its not a penalty 🤣

[DennisNedry]

I didn't think there were any credible penalty shouts yesterday for either team tbh.

[HesNotGudjonsonn2]

It was the handball one I was speaking of.

[Muzzy_no7]

12 hours ago, sm1 said:

They just air brushed it out. Discussed the Palace possible pen, but completely ignored our blatant pen.

Agenda

[HighPeakFox]

Just now, Muzzy_no7 said:

Agenda

Please, don't. 

[MPH]

3 hours ago, whoareyaaa said:

Was to close to the player never a peno

 

where else is his hand supposed to be? In the changing room!?

 

 

 

 

( his hand was NOT in a natural position)

Edited 6 October 2024 by MPH

[Foxdiamond]

Not shown in extended highlights either although mentioned by commentator at end of match. If not a penalty hope officials show consistency in our matches for rest of season 

[Fear Of The Fox]

Why they just don't fully get rid of this stupid rule? I know incidents like the one yesterday were given a penalty before and refs/VAR will award a penalty again for the same after the international break but it's just stupid. Just award a penalty when there's a clear scoring opportunity. For decades it worked perfectly like this. 

 

[Fear Of The Fox]

6 hours ago, Pliskin said:

It wasn’t a penalty.

I agree. Can you then guarantee the exact same won't be given against us this season? Because it will happen and it will be a penalty. 

[Bert]

It’s quite clearly a handball, but personally don’t think it’s deliberate/intentional. I’m sure there’d have been more of an uproar if we hadn’t have won. 
 

If the ref gives it, it probably doesn’t get over turned. But one of our players must’ve shagged the refs daughter yesterday which is why we got next to nothing. 

[Spiritwalker]

1 hour ago, dayday said:

I shout for everything even if i know its not a penalty 🤣

Yeah me too, I was out my seat screaming for that one yesterday,

not many others joined in though.

[whoareyaaa]

51 minutes ago, MPH said:

 

where else is his hand supposed to be? In the changing room!?

 

 

 

 

( his hand was NOT in a natural position)

yea but he was too close to him for it to be considered un natural 

[fox_favourite]

The ref yesterday was Darren Bond. He's just poor and incredibly inconsistent with his decisions. That is any game he refs.  I don't think it was a agenda, I think the ref was just crummy.

 

But I don't know what is handball and what is nower days. 

Edited 6 October 2024 by fox_favourite

[Royston.]

6 hours ago, foxfanazer said:

If you're talking about the Edouard one then it most definitely wasn't a penalty. I think somebody has tied his boot laces together before he came on

Thought Daka may have pranked him but then I remembered Daka can't tie shoelaces.

[MPH]

30 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

yea but he was too close to him for it to be considered un natural 

 

I know that might have been the decision but it was a very bad decision. A wrong decision.
 

 

[jmono84]

That handball is as blatant as I’ve seen since VAR has been implemented. Ask wilf what he thinks

Edited 6 October 2024 by jmono84

[Footballwipe]

2 hours ago, grobyfox1990 said:

Never ever a pen. The victims on this forum would be crying if that was given against us, and justifying it as the reason we should sue Man City for £500m 

It's getting nauseating now just how the weirdos on here are so sensitive to everything. The BBC have an agenda against us, that FA, PGMOL, the Premier League. Freak behaviour.

 

The kind of stuff you expect from the idiots supporting the top teams and now it's filtered down to us.

 

Makes this place absolutely insufferable, too. I wish they'd just keep it in the fragile minded echo chamber ref thread tbh.

[iancognito]

Not everything's a conspiracy.

 

We'd be fuming if that was given against us and fans have moaned for 2 or 3 years about this un/natural thing.

 

Either all ball to hand incidents are handball - similar to the way hockey does it - or it has to be left to common sense / interpretation which is where the whole inconsistency argument comes in.

[KP Fox]

13 hours ago, Pliskin said:

It wasn’t a penalty.

Of course it was a penalty! His hand was no where near his body