Leicester at risk of another Premier League PSR charge over latest accounts

[Raj]

Rudkin will sort us out!

[les-tah]

What time is the news dropping 🍿 💣 

[Bluetintedspecs]

36 minutes ago, foxfanazer said:

We'll get a 6 point deduction and then the club will announce Woyo to try to soften the blow

So after 50 odd pages where the actual facts are roundly discussed you feel that baseless, inaccurate negative shite is the wtg? 

I bet you're fun at parties 🥴 

[Nick]

7 minutes ago, les-tah said:

What time is the news dropping 🍿 💣 

Well apparently the club get an email so I doubt they will come up with any response publicly very quickly.

 

I'm uncertain if the Premier League leak or publish the results of their findings or just send to the club?

Edited 14 January by Nick

[suffolk fox]

1 hour ago, fox_favourite said:

 

 

 

Chelsea selling a car park, womens team and a hotel to subsidary groups within Chelsea fc absolutely stinks.  We know the premier league will do nothing.

[goose2010]

1 hour ago, fox_favourite said:

 

 

 

I just cant take someone serious that chooses to wear a shirt like that! 

[rugbyblue]

11 hours ago, sylofox said:

Are we going to use.

 

You can't use the last three yrs against us. You tried it once and we was found not guilty.

 

If we are that confident we must have something up our sleeves.

Im a bit lost in truth  

 

Not ashamed to say I don't really have much interest in the financial side of things and in all honesty I dont really know enough about it or understand it (which is self inflicted really as im not inclined to research it).  I thought it was done with and we had "got out of it" with nick di Marco and that was that.  What was the point of that if a deduction is still possible? 

 

I need an explanation aimed at a 6 year old 🤣

 

 

Edited 14 January by rugbyblue

[Iwebema]

1 minute ago, rugbyblue said:

Im a bit lost in truth  

 

Not ashamed to say I don't really have much interest in the financial side of things and in all honesty I dont really know enough about it or understand it (which is self inflicted really as im not inclined to research it).  I thought it was done with and we had "got out of it" with nick di Marco and that was that.  What was the point of that if a deduction is still possible? 

 

 

It's a never ending cycle essentially, multiple clubs will be here every January trying to figure out if they have managed to comply with these ridiculous rules

[ClaphamFox]

1 minute ago, rugbyblue said:

Im a bit lost in truth  

 

Not ashamed to say I don't really have much interest in the financial side of things and in all honesty I dont really know enough about it or understand it (which is self inflicted really as im not inclined to research it).  I thought it was done with and we had "got out of it" with nick di Marco and that was that.  What was the point of that if a deduction is still possible? 

 

 

Different accounting periods. Unfortunately getting away with it in one period does not mean you get away with it in the next one. 

[Sol thewall Bamba]

3 minutes ago, rugbyblue said:

Im a bit lost in truth  

 

Not ashamed to say I don't really have much interest in the financial side of things and in all honesty I dont really know enough about it or understand it (which is self inflicted really as im not inclined to research it).  I thought it was done with and we had "got out of it" with nick di Marco and that was that.  What was the point of that if a deduction is still possible? 

 

I need an explanation aimed at a 6 year old 🤣

Is that you Jon?

[rugbyblue]

Thanks both 

[foxfanazer]

5 minutes ago, Bluetintedspecs said:

So after 50 odd pages where the actual facts are roundly discussed you feel that baseless, inaccurate negative shite is the wtg? 

I bet you're fun at parties 🥴 

Whereas you ....

[AjcW]

12 minutes ago, les-tah said:

What time is the news dropping 🍿 💣 

20 past -6

[The Hitman]

I’m probably putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5 but I have a feeling there would have been a leak had we failed. 
 

The FA staff would have been too giddy at the prospect of getting their own back on us for them to all keep it under wraps from their journo mates. 

[Lcfc-1992]

Hopefully if we are charged the punishment won’t be until next season. 

[foxfanazer]

2 minutes ago, The Hitman said:

I’m probably putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5 but I have a feeling there would have been a leak had we failed. 
 

The FA staff would have been too giddy at the prospect of getting their own back on us for them to all keep it under wraps from their journo mates. 

It definitely felt like there was much more noise around the Everton and Forest ones. Like you say you'd think they'd be some stronger info

[Bert]

The only reason there’s been no leak is that there’s been an embargo placed on it. 

[ClaphamFox]

1 minute ago, Bert said:

The only reason there’s been no leak is that there’s been an embargo placed on it. 

Embargos are placed on press releases, not leaks.

[Finnegan]

Just now, ClaphamFox said:

Embargos are placed on press releases, not leaks.

 

In fairness, we're an extremely tight lipped club. The only leaks generally are to the press. 

 

I highly doubt whoever gets the team sheets early has privileged information on our financials. 

 

The only other leaks are transfer related and probably come from agents. 

 

[teblin]

1 minute ago, ClaphamFox said:

Embargos are placed on press releases, not leaks.

Yeah but wouldn’t be worth the risk for whoever leaked it.

[Trav Le Bleu]

2 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

Embargos are placed on press releases, not leaks.

If only you could embargo leaks

 

[VLC86]

34 minutes ago, Raj said:

Rudkin out will sort us!

I’ve rearranged the sentence into the correct order for you.

Edited 14 January by VLC86

[happy85]

 

[LcFc_Smiv]

17 minutes ago, Nick said:

Well apparently the club get an email so I doubt they will come up with any response publicly very quickly.

 

I'm uncertain if the Premier League leak or publish the results of their findings or just send to the club?

The SSN report yesterday was that the PL would announce who they were charging.

[happy85]

Looks like a another loophole found