Popular Post JimJams Posted 3 June Popular Post Posted 3 June To spend on 34 year old luxury players. 13
Ric Flair Posted 3 June Posted 3 June 3 hours ago, JimJams said: To spend on 34 year old luxury players. 😂😂😂😂😂
MPH Posted 4 June Posted 4 June This would give us the money to make an offer for JJ. Not that he would join us now.  But I’m sure we will invest the time trying..Few bigger teams than us with serious interest in him, according to online reports- Atalanta and a Spanish team plus several championship teams..
CornwallFox Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 1 hour ago, MPH said: This would give us the money to make an offer for JJ. Not that he would join us now.  But I’m sure we will invest the time trying..Few bigger teams than us with serious interest in him, according to online reports- Atalanta and a Spanish team plus several championship teams.. Dude, you need to move on. We're in league one. I fear you haven't truly understood. JJ flew the nest weeks ago.Â
ronnup Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 15 hours ago, JimJams said: To spend on 34 year old luxury players.  😆  Announce Ings!!!
fox_favourite Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 12 minutes ago, ronnup said:  😆  Announce Ings!!! Mullen and Fletcher. You can imagine they have watched the documentary and thought "that's a good idea!"
FLAN Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 6 hours ago, MPH said: This would give us the money to make an offer for JJ. Not that he would join us now.  But I’m sure we will invest the time trying..Few bigger teams than us with serious interest in him, according to online reports- Atalanta and a Spanish team plus several championship teams.. Saw something that said us getting relegated invalidated the clause so …
Foxes96 Posted 4 June Posted 4 June Felt he was always likely to leave. But if the Monga wonga means we are less likely to have to sell the likes of Page, Aluko or Nelson even, for example, then I’m at peace with it. 3
Guppys Love Child Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 11 minutes ago, Foxes96 said: Felt he was always likely to leave. But if the Monga wonga means we are less likely to have to sell the likes of Page, Aluko or Nelson even, for example, then I’m at peace with it. I agree.  He's definitely a talent, but also a ' flair player' in a position we do have more experience players fulfilling.  Whilst it's a shame to (possibly) see him go, he's not irreplaceable. 1
jonny_wright Posted 4 June Posted 4 June This deal needs to be heavily incentivised, money for England appearance, cup wins, appearances etc etc - so this deal keeps on paying us if he reaches his potential 2
les-tah Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 40 minutes ago, jonny_wright said: This deal needs to be heavily incentivised, money for England appearance, cup wins, appearances etc etc - so this deal keeps on paying us if he reaches his potential Dream on we got Rudkin at the wheel. Best we will get is a signed monga shirt and box of chocolates every year. 1
MPH Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 7 hours ago, CornwallFox said: Dude, you need to move on. We're in league one. I fear you haven't truly understood. JJ flew the nest weeks ago. did you see the post I made yesterday about Top and hid delusional think and waiting his time on stuff? It was about that, not me
Les-TA-Jon Posted 4 June Posted 4 June On 02/06/2026 at 12:01, Foxes96 said: If we get a figure even close to that for him then can’t complain. And Arsenal would be a great move for him. One of the best in the country at bringing through young players as well at the minute. We absolutely should be complaining.  The club shouldn't be in the position to have to sell their best up and coming youth products just to keep the lights on. It's a disgrace that we've managed ourselves into this position. The entire point of spending £100m+ on Seagrave and it's high annual running costs was to create, develop and use players like Monga, not sell them early in their careers just to maintain cashflow and enable the signings of players with worse prospects. 1
Tommy Fresh Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 6 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said: We absolutely should be complaining.  The club shouldn't be in the position to have to sell their best up and coming youth products just to keep the lights on. It's a disgrace that we've managed ourselves into this position. The entire point of spending £100m+ on Seagrave and it's high annual running costs was to create, develop and use players like Monga, not sell them early in their careers just to maintain cashflow and enable the signings of players with worse prospects. Regardless of financial position he'd of likely gone anyway, albeit we'd of perhaps got a bit more for him.
Finnegan Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 1 hour ago, jonny_wright said: This deal needs to be heavily incentivised, money for England appearance, cup wins, appearances etc etc - so this deal keeps on paying us if he reaches his potential  It'll be the opposite.  I know everyone wants it to have sell on fees and other bonuses that match his perceived potential.  But the club will be desperate to generate as much money now as possible. It'll be hugely front loaded towards the biggest fee we can get now. Â
Tuna Posted 4 June Posted 4 June Probably spend the season on loan at Sheff Utd or Stoke, disgraceful we have let this happen.
les-tah Posted 4 June Posted 4 June (edited) 19 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: £15m and back on loan to us for the season please Dont even think that would be useful to us, technically he is probs better than 99.9% of league 1 players but will get absolutely bodied/bullied currently in that league at his age as we saw in the championship when he was largely ineffective or missing in games. Edited 4 June by les-tah
MPH Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 3 hours ago, FLAN said: Saw something that said us getting relegated invalidated the clause so …  it does. But top is the sought to waste time and money perusing the deal anyway..
Les-TA-Jon Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 52 minutes ago, Tommy Fresh said: Regardless of financial position he'd of likely gone anyway, albeit we'd of perhaps got a bit more for him. If we were a mid-table PL team like we 'should' be?Â
FoxinNotts Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 46 minutes ago, les-tah said: Dont even think that would be useful to us, technically he is probs better than 99.9% of league 1 players but will get absolutely bodied/bullied currently in that league at his age as we saw in the championship when he was largely ineffective or missing in games. no so sure that's true. We'll see (hopefully).Â
Buzzell Posted 4 June Posted 4 June 49 minutes ago, Tuna said: Probably spend the season on loan at Sheff Utd or Stoke, disgraceful we have let this happen. Let’s be honest he was never going to hang around here, even if we did stay up. He has plenty of suitors queuing up for him. It’s a great deal for us if we get a decent fee for him.
Recommended Posts