Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
EnderbyFox

Kasey McAteer - Bid Rejected

By EnderbyFox, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Cannot believe we've rejected that. Whilst it might leave us short, everyone keeps talking about the long term future of this club as a reason for them not spending this month. Get him gone.

Ornstein is usually reliable 

Can only think we are relying on him next season in the championship so don’t want to sell for that reason.  
it’s an astonishing call not to take £8m (although as pointed out above it won’t help psr this season as sale would be 1 July) 

 

however we could do with £8m of pure profit on our books next season with reduced allowable losses 

whoareyaaa

whoareyaaa

Posted
Posted
Just now, Nolucklcfc said:

Why would we not want to lose him? He’s bloody awful 

We will be crying out for him next season when we are under a transfer ban in the championship.

  • Haha 1
apollo4joe

apollo4joe

Posted
Posted

I genuinely don't understand what we're doing anymore.

 

We sell KDH in the summer for £30m for supposedly PRS reasons, but then spend £80m.

 

We recall Cannon and flog him £10m, even though his competition is Daka (not good enough) and Edouard (absolutely not good enough). Not saying Cannon is the answer, but any worse than those two?

 

Then we get offered a similar deal for a player who isn't going to be a top level player, barely gets minutes and when does, offers very little?

 

I'm sure thre can be arguments made to keep him, but we literally have no strategy anymore. It's just 'fly by the seat of our pants' and hope it all turns out well. Which it wont

  • Like 1
LFEFox23

LFEFox23

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Phil Mitchell said:

I'm sorry but Kasey is a passenger in this squad and has 0% influence on us staying up. Rudkin is mental.

and will also have 0% influence for us in the Championship next season..... no brainer 

Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted

Will they get promoted though? That’s a mighty big gamble is the deal is naff other than that. 
 

Do we gamble failing a future psr on their success? Burnley just got Edwards on a similar deal it’s not like sunderland are clearly going to achieve promotion 

  • Like 1
CosbehFox

CosbehFox

Posted
Posted

I don’t know what planet we are on. This, the Thomas and the Iversen bids rejected in recent years are a total mystery and a proof we don’t understand PSR. 
 

These are the sort of deals Villa et al have been cracking out to make their spending work 

  • Like 1
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Will they get promoted though? That’s a mighty big gamble is the deal is naff other than that. 
 

Do we gamble failing a future psr on their success? Burnley just got Edwards on a similar deal it’s not like sunderland are clearly going to achieve promotion 

If it’s 8+2 then there’s no gamble. We get 8 even if they dont go up 

Number 6

Number 6

Posted
Posted

Feels like the initial story of the bid suggests a more generous offer than was actually made. A loan where they may not have to buy in the summer doesn't make sense for us. If they come back in with an offer to buy then yes we should be listening.

  • Like 2
lcfc_forever

lcfc_forever

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Ornstein is usually reliable 

Can only think we are relying on him next season in the championship so don’t want to sell for that reason.  
it’s an astonishing call not to take £8m (although as pointed out above it won’t help psr this season as sale would be 1 July) 

 

however we could do with £8m of pure profit on our books next season with reduced allowable losses 

It's bizarre. We don't have a replacement lined up it seems, hence the reluctance to sell. 

 

It's amateurish, lack of scenario planning. 

volpeazzurro

volpeazzurro

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

We will be crying out for him next season when we are under a transfer ban in the championship.

He's not good enough for the Championship, we saw that last year, get rid!

  • Like 1
UniFox21

UniFox21

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

I don’t know what planet we are on. This, the Thomas and the Iversen bids rejected in recent years are a total mystery and a proof we don’t understand PSR. 
 

These are the sort of deals Villa et al have been cracking out to make their spending work 

If we take each bid with a pinch of salt, we'd be hitting £10m for Thomas and Kasey, and an extra £5m from Iversen. All 3 hitting £15m straight of profit. 

 

Ridiculous that we haven't been accepting them. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
5waller5

5waller5

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, lcfc_forever said:

It's bizarre. We don't have a replacement lined up it seems, hence the reluctance to sell. 

 

It's amateurish, lack of scenario planning. 


It’s incredible to think that the scenario that we haven’t planned for is “needing a winger”!!!! 
 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...