Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Happy Fox

Danny Rohl - incoming?

By Happy Fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, jv1 said:

I know it sounds harsh and I don’t completely disagree with all you say but barnes and Maddison got relegated from the prem not the championship and we know there is a million miles between the 2 pairs of players - I am absolutely 💯 hoping the young lads come through and are good enough from the new crop - would be mad not to want it of course we all do - it’s the perfect scenario all round - but it hasn’t even been close to the case for many years - barnes , kdh and  chilwell have been the only 3 really in 10 years which tells its own story - fingers crossed Nelson and monga are the next few that take their chance 

You disagree that having more players in international football at youth level is an indication the quality of players coming through is improving on what it was before?

 

That’s a bit of an odd view but each to their own!

jv1

jv1

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, LCFCJohn said:

You disagree that having more players in international football at youth level is an indication the quality of players coming through is improving on what it was before?

 

That’s a bit of an odd view but each to their own!

Definitely don’t say that anywhere at all pal 

LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jv1 said:

Definitely don’t say that anywhere at all pal 

 

You did state you disagree with everything in the post that had at the end ‘The fact we've got so many young lads in an around international football is certainly a sign that we're improving the quality of players we're bringing through’

 

jv1

jv1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LCFCJohn said:

 

You did state you disagree with everything in the post that had at the end ‘The fact we've got so many young lads in an around international football is certainly a sign that we're improving the quality of players we're bringing through’

 

Nope - ‘I don’t completely disagree’ very different 

LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, jv1 said:

Nope - ‘I don’t completely disagree’ very different 

Fair enough. Still think you’re being overly negative about the one single positive thing we have going for the club at the moment….

jv1

jv1

Posted
Posted
Just now, LCFCJohn said:

Fair enough. Still think you’re being overly negative about the one single positive thing we have going for the club at the moment….

Always one John giving Johns a bad name 😂😂👍

  • Haha 2
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Happy Fox said:

One of Owlstalk's ITKs.. (thebizzle) is reporting that Rohl won't be attending their pre season training which is due to start this Thursday, so :fc: he's LCFC bound.

 

https://www.owlstalk.co.uk/forums/topic/339582-club-statement/page/27/#comment-11651619

 

It's a given at this point that Rohl is leaving.

 

It seems increasingly unlikely he's coming here. To be honest, there was never any real reason to think he was other than people wanted it.

 

  • Like 3
MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted

I’d be very surprised if we are bringing in a manager whilst having to pay ANY compensation… unfortunately, there’s quite a few available for free.. wether we think they are good enough or not…

Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, MPH said:

I’d be very surprised if we are bringing in a manager whilst having to pay ANY compensation… unfortunately, there’s quite a few available for free.. wether we think they are good enough or not…

I don’t think Dyche is even being considered. And I know Rohl is top of the list. If Dyche was top of the list I imagine they would have been more likely to take the hit on sacking Ruud, and then appointing him on a free. I think we’re gambling on him still being at Sheff Wednesday when we sack Ruud, and I even think we’re gambling on him walking away too… that’s how ridiculous we are! 

  • Thanks 1
LCFCCKEANO

LCFCCKEANO

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

It's a given at this point that Rohl is leaving.

 

It seems increasingly unlikely he's coming here. To be honest, there was never any real reason to think he was other than people wanted it.

 

Think the longer he goes without getting employed the higher the chance he does come here, I am certain Boro would’ve taken him over Edwards, story was he was on their shortlist but at no point does it mention him having interest

  • Like 1
oxford blue

oxford blue

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Happy Fox said:

One of Owlstalk's ITKs.. (thebizzle) is reporting that Rohl won't be attending their pre season training which is due to start this Thursday, so :fc: he's LCFC bound.

Is he contact bound to attend - I understand start is just gym sessions/general fitness? Assuming RVN is sacked, I would like Roh (particularly as I think it would be good for the young players we have on edge of first team), but it's reported he has a £5m release clause in his contract; just cannot see City paying that as well compensation for RVN. Just cannot see this happening, but would like to proved wrong if alternative is Dyche 

  • Like 1
DezFox

DezFox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

 

It's a given at this point that Rohl is leaving.

 

It seems increasingly unlikely he's coming here. To be honest, there was never any real reason to think he was other than people wanted it.

 

I agree. I would want him but never seriously linked. 

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, FoxesFourLife said:

I cannot see Rohl leaving one financial shit show for another one the latest news is not good at all. 


our financial issues are with PSR compliance, not actually being flat broke like Wednesday are. To my knowledge, we’ve never paid staff or players late, for example.

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

 

It's a given at this point that Rohl is leaving.

 

It seems increasingly unlikely he's coming here. To be honest, there was never any real reason to think he was other than people wanted it.

 


 

whilst this is nothing concrete, if a local rag reporter is claiming him to be the leading candidate, then there has to be SOMETHING in it , I’d think..

 

Rohl has been repeatedly linked with the Foxes post and according to reporter Graeme Bailey, is the main candidate for the gig.


 

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday-danny-rohl-leicester-city-5162273

 

 

Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

 

It's a given at this point that Rohl is leaving.

 

It seems increasingly unlikely he's coming here. To be honest, there was never any real reason to think he was other than people wanted it.

 

If he were to change his mind, somehow, he'd be best-suited for LCFC to be honest - via his ability to operate the team well on a tight budget, knows the league, has different formation ideas etc.

FoxesFourLife

FoxesFourLife

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, MPH said:


our financial issues are with PSR compliance, not actually being flat broke like Wednesday are. To my knowledge, we’ve never paid staff or players late, for example.

King Power are in trouble.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...