Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Jordan James joins on loan - Official

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
LCFCCKEANO

LCFCCKEANO

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

If we can have him for part of Friday and none of Monday I think we would be better off than a 30/60 split, if we can’t beat Wednesday with any midfield combo we will be done for at any rate

  • Like 8
StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LCFCCKEANO said:

If we can have him for part of Friday and none of Monday I think we would be better off than a 30/60 split, if we can’t beat Wednesday with any midfield combo we will be done for at any rate

I reckon he starts on bench on Friday, and given 45 mins minimum. 

Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Apart from the objective fact that his ppg was 33% better than the current manager's. 

Completely irrelevant, he had what 65% of the season and we were getting progressively worse under him. If that clown head was still here we’d absolutely be relegated by now. Again we did not have more then 2 performances where we deserved to win again under the clown, the results he got were pure luck. A turn around job is massively different to starting a season with the highest paid squad in the division. The games like Oxford were exactly how we played most of the season. If he had got results against absolute rubbish at home we wouldn’t be here but he didn’t because he was a useless fraud. 

  • Like 1
Sol thewall Bamba

Sol thewall Bamba

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Foxin_Mad said:

Completely irrelevant, he had what 65% of the season and we were getting progressively worse under him. If that clown head was still here we’d absolutely be relegated by now. Again we did not have more then 2 performances where we deserved to win again under the clown, the results he got were pure luck. A turn around job is massively different to starting a season with the highest paid squad in the division. The games like Oxford were exactly how we played most of the season. If he had got results against absolute rubbish at home we wouldn’t be here but he didn’t because he was a useless fraud. 

You're saying that the points gained by a team under different managers is "completely irrelevant" to the performance of the managers in question lol

  • Like 1
Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

You're saying that the points gained by a team under different managers is "completely irrelevant" to the performance of the managers in question lol

It is completely irrelevant you aren’t comparing apples with apples.
 

Again you are misunderstanding we got WORSE game after game under him. AGAIN it’s 2 different scenarios one bloke brought in at the start of the season with the highest paid squad, the second brought in to turn around a complete 6 month masterclass in being shit. A manager on a rescue mission can not come in click his fingers and fix months of embedded utter shite. Under the previous willy puller we couldn’t keep a clean sheet. 
 

Im not Rowetts biggest fan, 6 months back I wouldn’t want him here but he is 10 times the manager that clown head was. 

  • Like 2
Sol thewall Bamba

Sol thewall Bamba

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Foxin_Mad said:

It is completely irrelevant you aren’t comparing apples with apples.
 

Again you are misunderstanding we got WORSE game after game under him. AGAIN it’s 2 different scenarios one bloke brought in at the start of the season with the highest paid squad, the second brought in to turn around a complete 6 month masterclass in being shit. A manager on a rescue mission can not come in click his fingers and fix months of embedded utter shite. Under the previous willy puller we couldn’t keep a clean sheet. 
 

Im not Rowetts biggest fan, 6 months back I wouldn’t want him here but he is 10 times the manager that clown head was. 

Say Rowett continues to get 1ppg and we get relegated. 

 

Who would be at more fault, Marti after getting 1.33ppg for 2 thirds or so of the season or Rowett for getting 1ppg for the remaining third?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Say Rowett continues to get 1ppg and we get relegated. 

 

Who would be at more fault, Marti after getting 1.33ppg for 2 thirds or so of the season or Rowett for getting 1ppg for the remaining third?

If he continues to get 1ppg then he will have failed in his task, but he cant come in flick a switch and make us good overnight after months of abysmal coaching and tactics. (2/3 of a season as you say)

 

The Spanish fraud will always be most at fault as he was the captain of the Titanic in calmer waters and he went full speed towards an iceberg! If we are relegated they will both be at fault, that said turning around a team in shit form is going to be somewhat harder than starting a fresh season with the highest paid squad in the division. 1.33ppg over the 2 thirds of the season is still shit however you paint it, and if 1 continues that will also be shit. I am pretty sure if we had been stupid enough to stick with Marti we would have had a worse ppg by now as we would have lost every game 3 or 4 -0 

  • Like 1
Spiritwalker

Spiritwalker

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Say Rowett continues to get 1ppg and we get relegated. 

 

Who would be at more fault, Marti after getting 1.33ppg for 2 thirds or so of the season or Rowett for getting 1ppg for the remaining third?

Or  Andy King for getting 0.0ppg

Sol thewall Bamba

Sol thewall Bamba

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Foxin_Mad said:

If he continues to get 1ppg then he will have failed in his task, but he cant come in flick a switch and make us good overnight after months of abysmal coaching and tactics. (2/3 of a season as you say)

 

The Spanish fraud will always be most at fault as he was the captain of the Titanic in calmer waters and he went full speed towards an iceberg! If we are relegated they will both be at fault, that said turning around a team in shit form is going to be somewhat harder than starting a fresh season with the highest paid squad in the division. 1.33ppg over the 2 thirds of the season is still shit however you paint it, and if 1 continues that will also be shit. I am pretty sure if we had been stupid enough to stick with Marti we would have had a worse ppg by now as we would have lost every game 3 or 4 -0 

At there it is sports fans.

AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

At there it is sports fans.

Same divs that hounded Claude Puel out for his accent.

 

Marti was objectively not good enough to be the Leicester City manager and Gary Rowett has done nothing to suggest he is yet either.

Pita

Pita

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, StanSP said:

I reckon he starts on bench on Friday, and given 45 mins minimum. 

If he only gets 20 mins on Friday so he’s ready for Monday 

Pita

Pita

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Spiritwalker said:

Or  Andy King for getting 0.0ppg

You can’t blame king he was dropped in the deep end 

  • Like 1
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, LCFCCKEANO said:

If we can have him for part of Friday and none of Monday I think we would be better off than a 30/60 split, if we can’t beat Wednesday with any midfield combo we will be done for at any rate

Whilst you’re right in what you say, I’m not worried about him missing the that one… I’m worried we lose him for the rest of the season. 
 

id be quite happy to do winks and skip for the next 2 if it meant a fit JJ for the remainder of the season.  Putting it simply our medical team need to play a blinder and let’s hope it’s not like Ramsey 

  • Like 1
Jock's Hill

Jock's Hill

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Pita said:

You can’t blame king he was dropped in the deep end 

2 of Andy King's games we were down to 10 men before we knew it. Really felt for him.

  • Like 2
Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

At there it is sports fans.

 

2 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Same divs that hounded Claude Puel out for his accent.

 

Marti was objectively not good enough to be the Leicester City manager and Gary Rowett has done nothing to suggest he is yet either.

Its funny really the only reason this absolute nobody got the gig is because his name wasn't Big Barry Curtis from Burnley. He was the same level of league 2 standard manager whatever country he is from. 

 

Generally I couldn't give a rats ass where a manager come from if he is competent or even semi competent at our stage, but I think Rudkin and top have a theory that big name or from abroad (or was in Barcelona once) = good. 

 

Puel was a decent team builder and good at working with young players, 155 million times the level of Marti, who simply is not a football manager. That is my only problem with him. 

  • 2 weeks later...
fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted
Just now, Ryy said:

 

Such a shame we're going down. He is the only player that I like and someone who you can build a team around. 

 

Best loan signing we've had in a hell of a while. 

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...