Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Tommy G said:

Mavididi and Faes likely, the others I don't think so. Unless some braindead DoF in the championship thinks Skipp is good value at that level,

Middlesbrough were interested until we asked for £15m

  • Haha 4
Posted
13 hours ago, stevostadium said:

Priority is to get money in and ship the high earners out.

The signings will follow when we know what we need.

I expect at least 6 more out the door within the next week.

 

Again, can only go on what i have heard first hand, but "the new DOF and manager have done more in 3 weeks than the last 3 years of the previous incumbents".

Make of that what you will.

I'd expect this to be Fatawu, Nelson, Faes, Souttar, Mavididi and Skipp.

I'd rather loose Okoli than Nelson but he doesn't to be drawing much interest atm.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Silebyfox_89 said:

I'd expect this to be Fatawu, Nelson, Faes, Souttar, Mavididi and Skipp.

I'd rather loose Okoli than Nelson but he doesn't to be drawing much interest atm.

 

I would probably go with 5 of them, changing Skipp with Okoli.

 

Wouldnt surprise me if one of Stol or Vietes will be out too.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 hours ago, 5waller5 said:

How much of the current negotiations and player sales are down to JM? Is Rudkin still involved and if so to what extent.

 

Anyone have the inside track? 


From what I understand it is entirely JM that is leading this.

 

His job description from the owner himself details this, but also I’m hearing from inside that this is actually true and very much the case anyway.

 

More specifically I’ve heard there’s an “alignment” agreement between 3 people in the Club, JM is the one doing all the negotiating and setting up the deals and organising/liaising with the recruitment/academy lining up the targets not just the sales, the trigger is pulled on the releasing of players and signing of players if Martin AND Rudkin are onboard so as to be sure everyone is pulling in the right direction, or atleast an agreed direction.

 

So as I understand it, Rudkin’s actual involvement is basically seeing what James presents to him and Martin, and deciding between themselves wether to make a move or not based on James’s input. And also perhaps setting wage targets for McCarron to negotiate with players contracts running out.
 

Judging by what we are seeing so far with the activity we’ve seen, James has been successful in presenting his cases for sales and signings and the system seems to working. It’s far more efficient than previous years, that has to be down to none other than JM surely? 
 

I’m happy with our outgoings so far and the speed and the deal structures some of which have been impressive tbf, but I’d like to start seeing more signings now, I’m assuming we need to clear the decks abit more and bring more money in before that happens but hopefully progress on that front continues and we start seeing more signings roll in.

 

I’m happy so far with what I’ve seen from our new SD, however I’d actually quite like to hear from him now, I want to hear what he has to say on certain things and get a better judgment on where his thinking’s at rather than making assumptions from what we’ve seen or heard.

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, CruzNoir said:


From what I understand it is entirely JM that is leading this.

 

His job description from the owner himself details this, but also I’m hearing from inside that this is actually true and very much the case anyway.

 

More specifically I’ve heard there’s an “alignment” agreement between 3 people in the Club, JM is the one doing all the negotiating and setting up the deals and organising/liaising with the recruitment/academy lining up the targets not just the sales, the trigger is pulled on the releasing of players and signing of players if Martin AND Rudkin are onboard so as to be sure everyone is pulling in the right direction, or atleast an agreed direction.

 

So as I understand it, Rudkin’s actual involvement is basically seeing what James presents to him and Martin, and deciding between themselves wether to make a move or not based on James’s input. And also perhaps setting wage targets for McCarron to negotiate with players contracts running out.
 

Judging by what we are seeing so far with the activity we’ve seen, James has been successful in presenting his cases for sales and signings and the system seems to working. It’s far more efficient than previous years, that has to be down to none other than JM surely? 
 

I’m happy with our outgoings so far and the speed and the deal structures some of which have been impressive tbf, but I’d like to start seeing more signings now, I’m assuming we need to clear the decks abit more and bring more money in before that happens but hopefully progress on that front continues and we start seeing more signings roll in.

 

I’m happy so far with what I’ve seen from our new SD, however I’d actually quite like to hear from him now, I want to hear what he has to say on certain things and get a better judgment on where his thinking’s at rather than making assumptions from what we’ve seen or heard.

 

 

Prett much word for word what i have been told.

Although i was told Rudkin just oversees it and leaves to JM and MG to sort.

 

We probably have same contacts !!!

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, stevostadium said:

Prett much word for word what i have been told.

Although i was told Rudkin just oversees it and leaves to JM and MG to sort.

 

We probably have same contacts !!!

Edited to add

 

JM was highly sought after and we beat a lot of competition to get him so we probably let him paddle his own canoe to a certain extent,

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, stevostadium said:

Edited to add

 

JM was highly sought after and we beat a lot of competition to get him so we probably let him paddle his own canoe to a certain extent,


Exactly

 

I've always thought it would make zero sense A) for James to leave such a position at CFG with no assurances of influence within the position here, and B) to hire him and literally not listen to him with the experiences he’s got

 

I get the Rudkin power complex folks have, it’s completely understandable but when you look at the calibre of JM, there’s no way he was going to be a push over or an unheard voice in the board.

 

To an extent, those worries or concerns imo should have been laid to rest now with what we’ve seen so far from his clear impact, it’s been completely different this summer the way we’ve gone about things, and that’s no coincidence with McCarron's appointment.

 

I’m by no means saying it’s been perfect, but it’s been a huge step forward from what it has been over the years.

 

I’d say as someone else has said, so far so good and to be quite honest, that makes a refreshing change 

Edited by CruzNoir
Posted
4 minutes ago, CruzNoir said:


Exactly

 

I've always thought it would make zero sense A) for James to leave such a position at CFG with no assurances of influence within the position here, and B) to hire him and literally not listen to him with the experiences he’s got

 

I get the Rudkin power complex folks have, it’s completely understandable but when you look at the calibre of JM, there’s no way he was going to be a push over or an unheard voice in the board.

 

to an extent, those worries or concerns imo should have been laid to rest now with what we’ve seen so far, it’s been completely different this summer the way we’ve gone about things, and that’s no coincidence with McCarron's appointment.

 

By no means saying it’s been perfect, but it’s been a huge step forward from what it has been over the years.

 

I’d say as someone else has said, so far so good and to be quite honest, that makes a refreshing change 

AGREE WITH ALL OF THAT CHAP

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...