Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, lukedlcfc22 said:

His reaction to a few fans calling his football shit was embarrassing and childish. The head loss made more join in with the boos and jeers. A leader would face up Brussel looked close to tears. Baby

What was his reaction?

Posted

The squad definitely has the quality to be fighting at the top of this league

 

But of course Top and Rudkin just couldn't resist doing something YET AGAIN to make it as hard as possible

 

You can guarantee they are absolutely going to drag this out, and even if they did sack him they wouldn't go for a proper well thought out replacement either - it will either be Hourihane (who by all accounts played pretty similar football at Barnsley) or some other shite appointment

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Piggyp said:

Had that dickhead Chris from LTID saying it was the “Best performance of the season “ while we have absolute twats like that saying such obvious dross, what chance have we got, the old fool needs to retire, he thinks he’s just hilarious he just talks shite, the other guy Tom is much much better, at least he talks a lot of common sense.

We really do have a special breed of vloggers, fan groups and podcasts. (BSLB and Pubcast aside) 

Posted
5 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Good goal from Cov there 

I didn't see it but what's that got to do with sides who have the players to play out scoring more than they concede by playing out? 

If you're issue was with sides who clearly can't do it, having a go like us with McCarthy in goal I'd agree.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tommy Fresh said:

I didn't see it but what's that got to do with sides who have the players to play out scoring more than they concede by playing out? 

If you're issue was with sides who clearly can't do it, having a go like us with McCarthy in goal I'd agree.

I presume he means 3 touches from keeper to back of the net.

 

Anyway it’s weird that Top or whoever is obsessed with possession football. If a team ever needed a philosophy for success surely we should’ve progressed with counter attacking football after winning the league, sought the best managers that fit that model as opposed to possession. 
At least under Rodgers it was possession with intent.

  • Like 2
Posted

I can’t comment on the statistics but purely from a fan point of view and what entertains me I have absolutely no interest in watching us play this way. 
 

McCarthy passing to Thomas or whatever CB that has two men already on them basically two metres from our own goal. 
 

Not for me. 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

The squad definitely has the quality to be fighting at the top of this league

 

But of course Top and Rudkin just couldn't resist doing something YET AGAIN to make it as hard as possible

 

You can guarantee they are absolutely going to drag this out, and even if they did sack him they wouldn't go for a proper well thought out replacement either - it will either be Hourihane (who by all accounts played pretty similar football at Barnsley) or some other shite appointment

More than enough to be at the top.  What’s frustrating though is the team are happy to follow his shit football to the letter,

maybe even more so than he expects and play the lazy cowards pass, even when the quick and clean option is in front of them. 

The quick back to front attacking football produced some decent chances, even Faes was making some good passes to Alves in space. When they slowed the attacks down and over play, you can feel nothing is coming from it.
 

I like Aluko and this isn’t digging him, at the end of the first half he took 10 touches and slowed it down while bringing the ball across the middle, then passed to Alves when it was too late.  He had the space to pass first time but this seems to be the tactics. 

 

The second half showed how thick and cowardly they can be, on top of the shocking subs, stinking it out is default. 
 

It will never be Martins faults as I’m assuming in his mind it’s perfectly executed, it’s everyone else who is at fault. 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

I presume he means 3 touches from keeper to back of the net.

 

Anyway it’s weird that Top or whoever is obsessed with possession football. If a team ever needed a philosophy for success surely we should’ve progressed with counter attacking football after winning the league, sought the best managers that fit that model as opposed to possession. 
At least under Rodgers it was possession with intent.

Yeah that still has nothing to do with the argument he makes all the time, literally no ones arguing Martins style of play isn't shit and teams doing it without the personel to do so is crap

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rubbersoul said:

I can’t comment on the statistics but purely from a fan point of view and what entertains me I have absolutely no interest in watching us play this way. 
 

McCarthy passing to Thomas or whatever CB that has two men already on them basically two metres from our own goal. 
 

Not for me. 

 

Don't think anyone is defending Martins style of play are they?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

We really do have a special breed of vloggers, fan groups and podcasts. (BSLB and Pubcast aside) 

Not just some podcasts. Radio Leicester were praising Luke Thomas for his performance today!lol

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't think their would be a single club in this division that wouldn't swap their players for ours.  It's so frustrating that we have the tools to do the job but we are being hindered by our own set up.

 

I think it was @BigGibbo said it best in another thread - we are gifting the opposition chances that they aren't good enough to create by themselves 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...