Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Personally I would prefer it if we get taken over by either a faceless consortium type or a complete ***** so that our pathetic fans can't lose all self respect and fall in love with another blunderhead billionaire. 

 

 

 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Lineker's Left Foot said:

No disrespect to @Wymsey I didn’t know that he was ITK?

Think he get some news from time to time. Like with any one. Sometime it comes off sometimes it doesn't.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, CornwallFox said:

I do not believe for a second that Boely is interested in looking at us.

But if he was....I would jump at that chance. There's no way he comes in to fail. 

But, as I say, I would be absolutely gobsmacked if he even had us on a super long range radar.

It makes sense….. the US market is heavily investing in English football, and we’re somewhat of a famous name there now within the sports world, we’ve got the blueprint for a much bigger operation than the likes of Wrexham and Birmingham City, and if we get turned around it’s another amazing story……. 

 

It’s more likely an American investor takes us over, and it might be a fairly easy move for a consortium led by Todd, plus he’s not shy throwing money around, so he may feel like this is a good opportunity for him and another. 
 

There also plenty of NFL and NBA franchise owners sniffing around English football, so there’s a very strong chance someone else is interested and has approach Todd to form part of the consortium. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

It makes sense….. the US market is heavily investing in English football, and we’re somewhat of a famous name there now within the sports world, we’ve got the blueprint for a much bigger operation than the likes of Wrexham and Birmingham City, and if we get turned around it’s another amazing story……. 

 

It’s more likely an American investor takes us over, and it might be a fairly easy move for a consortium led by Todd, plus he’s not shy throwing money around, so he may feel like this is a good opportunity for him and another. 
 

There also plenty of NFL and NBA franchise owners sniffing around English football, so there’s a very strong chance someone else is interested and has approach Todd to form part of the consortium. 

It would be good marketing spin to "rebuild the 5000-1 club". Would play well internationally as a story.

Posted
13 hours ago, Corky said:

Going off topic slightly here but relevant to your last point- a lot of fans haven't grasped how the club has grown in the past decade. Growing up their heroes (and mine) were the likes of Steve Walsh, Robbie Savage, Iwan Roberts, Muzzy (my personal favourite). All great players for the club but didn't make much noise, really (Savage did but not talent-wise). Ended up at First Division bottom half Norwich and Premier League mid table Birmingham. The only one who really progressed was Heskey at Liverpool.

 

Our recent greats- Vardy, Schmeichel, Mahrez, Kante, Tielemans, Barnes- all won the league and/ or cup or went to win the Champions League, Europa League and World Cup. They made their careers with us. Atletico in 1997 was an iconic game but 20 years later we pushed a brilliant Atletico team all the way in a quarter-final.

 

When we were last in this division I think we had three crowds over 23k. We have sold that in season tickets alone this time. Of course people would want to buy into that.

Great point. As city fans, It's only natural to feel let down by our downwards spiral, 10 years of bewilderment. But we did grow into a team the whole world talked about and thats still there, less prominent now but all was irreversibly changed when we won the premiership. Lashing out at a spoiled child who who didn’t dream his fathers dreams is as daft as not appreciating the impact of covid.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lineker's Left Foot said:

No disrespect to @Wymsey I didn’t know that he was ITK?

 

Don't think Wymsey would generally ever make himself out to be "an ITK" and I can't remember him ever making stuff up for attention. 

 

Think someone in his family has business connections that occasionally have dealings with the club or know someone that does. Either way, he gets told things every now and then that have been correct. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Allegedly Chelsea are in major financial difficulties behind the scenes and Boehly wants out, so it’s not totally out of the question, but feels unlikely 

Posted (edited)

A name Im thinking is Mark Cuban. As a follower of the Mavericks, it appears that he is looking to invest in English football, and it’s not unrealistic to suggest he and Boehly could head up the consortium. 
 

It’s also worth noting that £200m is reasonable in the eyes of US investors. So it’s not as mad as we might think. 

Edited by Pliskin
Posted

I was having a think about Boehly and his motivations.

 

A lot of the US sports franchises are driven by value, which actually seems to be the bigger thing to these billionaires rather than actually winning trophies. (Which isn't as flippant as it sounds, as on average, your US team would win the thing once every 30 years, so its not actually worth getting your hopes up for!) There are regular Forbes rankings of "my dick is bigger than your dick" franchise values.

Although the value is hypothetical until there is a part sale. The recent part-sale has just valued Liverpool at £5bn to £6bn (actually similar to the Dodgers' value a couple of years ago), so English football clubs are trending towards some of the biggest in the world. But there are very few clubs in England that are at that level of value, and they won't change hands very often. If you look outside the rich 6, there are only a handful of other clubs that have won the Premier Leauge, played in the Champions League and have that Worldwide recognition. So that would be the next place to look: and if you can buy cheap and get them to compete, the potential prize is billions.

And if he could invest a paltry £400m - £100m to buy the club, £100m to build the new stand, £100m for new players, £100m to fund wages for a couple of years: all it takes is a couple of promotions for us to be back in the Premier League and the value would rocket.

 

And my understanding of Chelsea is that he wants to be hands on and make decisions, but he doesn't have enough control to do that with Clearlake and the other shareholders. (I'm not sure who was driving the policy of young players on long term deals, but his name certainly comes up enough). Whatever his early ideas were about how to invest in a squad, he will have learnt a lot about English football over the last few years, and I reckon he'd want another go given the mess at Chelsea with bloated squads, unhappy players and underperformance.

So I can understand the appeal of getting fed up with the battle at Chelsea, (the fact you can't top being World Champions anyway) and deciding to just sell up and go somwhere he can have sole control. And following on from Wrexham & Birmingham, I can see the appeal of the story of taking a club in League One and going through promotions.

 

I don't know about his motivations for selling his stake in the Lakers (it might be as simple as Walter wants out to fund his legal battles and he will become marginalised with new buyers) but I don't think it is necessarily a stretch to see him cashing in on 2 sales and deciding we would make a great project to use that cash for.

Posted

Boehly is insane but he bought one of the biggest football clubs in the world and then prided himself in spending loads of money on the most famous "wonderkids" in the sport. 

 

Everything he did at Chelsea was flashy and gimmicky. He's not buying a League One club from a nothing, provincial East Midlands city is he? 

 

  • Like 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Boehly is insane but he bought one of the biggest football clubs in the world and then prided himself in spending loads of money on the most famous "wonderkids" in the sport. 

 

Everything he did at Chelsea was flashy and gimmicky. He's not buying a League One club from a nothing, provincial East Midlands city is he? 

 

Surely not. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Boehly is insane but he bought one of the biggest football clubs in the world and then prided himself in spending loads of money on the most famous "wonderkids" in the sport. 

 

Everything he did at Chelsea was flashy and gimmicky. He's not buying a League One club from a nothing, provincial East Midlands city is he? 

 

No

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Boehly is insane but he bought one of the biggest football clubs in the world and then prided himself in spending loads of money on the most famous "wonderkids" in the sport. 

 

Everything he did at Chelsea was flashy and gimmicky. He's not buying a League One club from a nothing, provincial East Midlands city is he? 

 



He’s buying a club that he sees as having potential, we will rise again..

Edited by Happy Fox
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Boehly is insane but he bought one of the biggest football clubs in the world and then prided himself in spending loads of money on the most famous "wonderkids" in the sport. 

 

Everything he did at Chelsea was flashy and gimmicky. He's not buying a League One club from a nothing, provincial East Midlands city is he? 

 

As you say, he’s insane. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Happy Fox said:



He’s buying a club that he sees as having potential, we will rise again..

He's not going from hobnobbing around Chelsea to slumming it in league one in Leicester. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Happy Fox said:



He’s buying a club that he sees as having potential, we will rise again..

He doesn't believe in promotion / relegation and the whole European system. He'll have no interest in messing around with a £2m TV deal and having to slum boardrooms with businessmen from such backgrounds as selling ice cream. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, ronnup said:

 

Hes not moving to Braunstone mate. Its a business. 

It doesn't fit with any of his previous purchases. 

 

He buys stakes in elite organisations like the Lakers, Dodgers and Chelsea. 

 

He doesn't buy sport organisations in unattractive leagues in provincial backwaters. 

Posted

I hate to be a bore but there's little point in speculating at the moment. Citibank will keep their cards very close to their chest. Serious bidders don't want publicity right now. There could literally be as many as 50 to 100 parties what have pressed for further details. 

 

I would treat every rumour of any interested party with scepticism. It will go up a tick with first bids and then exclusivity to follow up. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

I hate to be a bore but there's little point in speculating at the moment. Citibank will keep their cards very close to their chest. Serious bidders don't want publicity right now. There could literally be as many as 50 to 100 parties what have pressed for further details. 

 

I would treat every rumour of any interested party with scepticism. It will go up a tick with first bids and then exclusivity to follow up. 

 

 

... are these 100 bidders in the room with us now? 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, FoxesWalk said:

Allegedly Chelsea are in major financial difficulties behind the scenes and Boehly wants out, so it’s not totally out of the question, but feels unlikely 

Find this hard to believe, especially as they are spending more this season than they ever have even buying ageing talent in Henderson and Welbeck.

Posted

Wymsey was the first to call Steve Cooper & also Odsonne Edouard, judging by the success of those 2 we should expect Chansiri or Mike Ashley at Seagrave shortly

  • Haha 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...