accessory Posted 26 February 2011 Posted 26 February 2011 In the last 7 league games with Weale in the side, we've picked up 16 points out of 21. In the last 7 league games Weale hasn't started, we've picked up 8 points out of 21. These are facts which not even the most rabid happy-clappy or diehard Sven loyalist can dispute.
m00nie Posted 26 February 2011 Posted 26 February 2011 In the last 7 league games with Weale in the side, we've picked up 16 points out of 21. In the last 7 league games Weale hasn't started, we've picked up 8 points out of 21. These are facts which not even the most rabid happy-clappy or diehard Sven loyalist can dispute. so its ricardos fault we didnt get points before he came?? i know he gets the blame for most things but i think even this is taking it too far??
davieG Posted 26 February 2011 Posted 26 February 2011 In the last 7 league games with Weale in the side, we've picked up 16 points out of 21. In the last 7 league games Weale hasn't started, we've picked up 8 points out of 21. These are facts which not even the most rabid happy-clappy or diehard Sven loyalist can dispute. Have you also analysed who else was playing and where, what standard of teams we were playing etc. if not your fact is just an isolated meaningless statistic.
AlphaMaleFox Posted 26 February 2011 Posted 26 February 2011 1 word... Weale! (PS. I'm a chav from L1, definitely it is better to be than a keyboard-warrior. ) This
stix Posted 26 February 2011 Posted 26 February 2011 In the last 7 league games with Weale in the side, we've picked up 16 points out of 21. In the last 7 league games Weale hasn't started, we've picked up 8 points out of 21. These are facts which not even the most rabid happy-clappy or diehard Sven loyalist can dispute. But These games must surely be : derby(Ricardo) 3 points, Bristol(Ricardo) 3 points, Cardiff(Ricardo) 0 points, Coventry(Ricardo) 1 point, and 3 games when Logan played. So 7 out of those 8 points were gained when Ricardo was between the sticks...
MC Prussian Posted 26 February 2011 Posted 26 February 2011 In the last 7 league games with Weale in the side, we've picked up 16 points out of 21. In the last 7 league games Weale hasn't started, we've picked up 8 points out of 21. These are facts which not even the most rabid happy-clappy or diehard Sven loyalist can dispute. Most clueless and incoherent statistics EVER. And you call that facts? The last 7 league games without Weale may have parts to do with Ricardo, as he's only played four games so far. What about "In the last 7 league games Weale hasn't started, Weale wasn't on the pitch." How's that for a fact? I find it somewhat amusing that some folks make their lives very easy by picking on a goalkeeper simply because their favourite isn't playing, but at the same time deliberately forget to put the blame on the actual individual culprits, in this case the majority of our field players today. ****ing grab a plastic shovel and go play in the sandpit where you can make a scene and cry for Weale as long as you want to.
gazzer Posted 26 February 2011 Posted 26 February 2011 apparently there's opinion and fact and i don't want to tread on those weale can be woeful and ricardo has looked a bit dodgy thougn he took some good catches today for me i prefer ricardo but there's not much in it. I feel mainly that when there is a big moment ricardo will make the right decision due to his vast experience Until ricardo lifts his foot and lets a back pass roll into the net i'm unlikely to change my view
Larry_LCFC Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 Cov's first goal proves that hes a pile of shite. Deffo no better than Weale clearly. Get the **** dropped
CosbehFox Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 Hmm it's difficult to defend him currently. Personally you have to question whether the defence are confidence in him. That should decide who to play.
gazzer Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 what's the point of this thread? do people seriously believe we'd have more points now with weale instead of ricardo? if so, have your weale back and let's move on
Haydos Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 Why is PVA not getting a load of stick for their goal. He was 75% to blame. Scapegoat.
accessory Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 Blind slavish obedience. 'AVE Sven, if he says he's good, maybe some clueless ****er will believe it But to be honest, Weale is one of the worst City keepers I have seen in the past two decades. One of the most pitiful attempts of trolling ever seen on FoxesTalk. City have had four worse keepers this season alone.
phillthefox Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 to be fair covs goal was mainly PVA's fault as he goes forward but isnt too good at getting back and leaves us open, however ricardo hasnt done much yet to show hes a worthy first choice in my opinion, but at least yesterday he actually caught the ball a few times unlike at cardiff tuesday so maybe hes getting better IN SVEN WE TRUST :sge:
Babylon Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 One of the most pitiful attempts of trolling ever seen on FoxesTalk. Coming from the man who posted this, that's funny. "In the last 7 league games with Weale in the side, we've picked up 16 points out of 21.In the last 7 league games Weale hasn't started, we've picked up 8 points out of 21. These are facts which not even the most rabid happy-clappy or diehard Sven loyalist can dispute."
dannythefox Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 It was PVAs fault for the build up to the goal but ricardo should of saved that i've seen it 4times this morning and i think our lass could of done better! If hes letting sloppy goals like that in god help us when we play QPR an Norwich.
accessory Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 The lowlights on the Football League Show didn't make Ricardo look any better. I wonder how his fan club manage to type on here from a position like this..
Guest ttfn Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 I thought Ricardo was pretty good yesterday. That was until I saw the goal. There's no doubt, given his excellence from close rage, that Weale would have saved that. But Ian Stringer (who I think's ok) summed up everything that's wrong with the Ricardo-bashing last night. Somebody phoned up to say that they thought Ricardo was good before Stringer said: "But imagine if it's the 90th minute of the play-off final against Forest and a high cross comes in. Who would you rather have in goal, Weale or Ricardo?". For me, that misses the point entirely. If Lewis McGugan was lining up a 30 yard free kick in the last minute would you want Weale in goal? They're both Championship goalkeepers. Both of them are going to have their strengths and weaknesses. I completely understand why people would want Weale in, but Ricardo wasn't too bad yesterday and yelling "Weale" is moronic and won't help anybody.
dannythefox Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 This might just be me but did noone see when he missed the headed the one that hit the crossbar that if it was 2" lower it would of been in, he hardly tried to jump!
anotherharboroughfox Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 This might just be me but did noone see when he missed the headed the one that hit the crossbar that if it was 2" lower it would of been in, he hardly tried to jump! doesn't matter though. didn't go in did it?
The Doctor Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 This might just be me but did noone see when he missed the headed the one that hit the crossbar that if it was 2" lower it would of been in, he hardly tried to jump! you can't know what was going through his head at that point. Was it a mistake he was lucky to get away with or was he aware of were the ball was going and looking to avoid conceding an unneccessary corner?
STEVIE B Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 This might just be me but did noone see when he missed the headed the one that hit the crossbar that if it was 2" lower it would of been in, he hardly tried to jump! Was about to make the same comment ! I didn't have the best angle,but he seemed to be stuck in quicksand.He looks very small for a 'keeper,doesn't command his area,and i hold my breath at crosses & corners.However,i'm not a member of the 'WEALE,WEALE!' brigade when Ricardo fumbles,as this not helping.IMO Weale should be in goal from now on.
LCFCmatt Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 In my opinion, those friggin' balloons being popped behind old Rick couldn't have helped him at all
B52 Posted 27 February 2011 Posted 27 February 2011 This might just be me but did noone see when he missed the headed the one that hit the crossbar that if it was 2" lower it would of been in, he hardly tried to jump! Some keepers have a sixth sense where the bar is so they jump only to see if it is inside. If they touch it and it goes out it's a corner so they only mark the ball. If Ricardo has it I don't know but for me it was clearly his ambition instead of let it be a corner. That was until I saw the goal. There's no doubt, given his excellence from close rage, that Weale would have saved that. So if Ricardo had put his legs more together and King had it just outside Ricardos legs. Would Weale have saved that too? Sometimes it looks like many thinks a gk reactions can do anything. In this case it depends on wich leg Ricardo has his weight on and if King signals something with his body language. Weale could have saved it with a bit of luck and so could Ricardo.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.