ajthefox Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 Routledge isn't a striker so why is anyone even mentioning him as if he would make up for not getting Yakubu?
Callabinho Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 Can Bert actually confirm that the deal looks like breaking down or are we all becoming a little impatient? If bert hears something he will let us know, I think this is just a way to get more for the yak, and I think we will oblige
StanSP Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 60 thousand views, 800 posts and still no signing. There have been some nonsensical and dumbass posts that's why.
Legend_in_blue Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 We don't need him. We certainly don't need anyone who is holding the club to ransom, demanding huge wage demands on the back of a season where he said he was happy here and would like to come back permanently. Haven't got time for this nonsense. Either sort it or clear off.
Babylon Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 Tanner says we are expected to go for Maynard if we get no Yak.
Liamlcfc1 Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 Tanner says we are expected to go for Maynard if we get no Yak. he also said that LCFC are not in contact with David Nugent what do you want to belive
ajthefox Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 If bert hears something he will let us know, I think this is just a way to get more for the yak, and I think we will oblige I agree. First it was just wages that were bothering the Yak, then all of a sudden West Ham wanted in and now he suddenly "isn't sure if he wants a perm deal in the champ". It's all bollocks if you ask me, his agent is just trying to scare us in to signing him and as others have said it's just getting annoying now.
Babylon Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 he also said that LCFC are not in contact with David Nugent what do you want to belive Maybe he's right and the others are wrong. Who is this fourth official that people are taking as gospel? Tanner and stringer might be guilty of over selling stuff, but they are not often wrong about this kind of stuff.
LeeTheFox Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 If u ask me i think this is just a cluster of ****!
Leicester_Loyal Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 Maybe he's right and the others are wrong. Who is this fourth official that people are taking as gospel? Tanner and stringer might be guilty of over selling stuff, but they are not often wrong about this kind of stuff. Bert said Nugent was having a medical today.
escos Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 he also said that LCFC are not in contact with David Nugent what do you want to belive No he didn't!!!!
Clarkielcfc Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 to be honest have we actually had any concrete source, that yak wants more and dont want champ football etc etc, or is it all just off of websites, has anyone atcually heard him or his agent say all this? or has everyone just read it?? just wondering if ive missed something in this thread thats all! if its all just from writing, then why the panic?? personally i still think he will sign!
StanSP Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 he also said that LCFC are not in contact with David Nugent what do you want to belive Where?! the Nugent deal is defo on. Don't know time frame though and not many peeps at city know apparantly. City cannot confirm anything about Nugent signing. The people at the club I speak to know nothing of a medical or press conference.
Liamlcfc1 Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 No he didn't!!!! ok he had no info on the Nugent deal from his contacts at City
Babylon Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 Where?! People seeing something that isn't there... I'm guilty of it on this ocassion. I put it down to being tired!!
StanSP Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 ok he had no info on the Nugent deal from his contacts at City People seeing something that isn't there... I'm guilty of it on this ocassion. I put it down to being tired!! You're usually very level-headed, so I can let you off . He does say though 'the people I speak to'. I could be reading too much in to it, but maybe he speaks to someone at the club who doesn't know something? A possibility, at least?
StanSP Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 By the way, I trust Bert and I trust Sven. I'm confident the deal is still on!
Liamlcfc1 Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 i think he has mad a few enquires now and found out more info RobTannerMerc Rob Tanner@ @liamlcfc people at the club know little about it. I originally heard it last week from Pompey. It is happening though, I understand.
Kitchandro Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 I think if Tanner didn't say anything at all no one would think he was saying it wasn't happening. Pointless tweets telling people you know nothing and wording it dubiously are bound to confuse people.
ScouseFox Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 In all fairness Tanner and Stringer probably get loads of tweets a day asking about transfers, some of them probably abusive, along the lines of "y de fk r u tw@s not tellin us wots appenin wiv da yak or nugent?!?!!!!", so he's simply tweeted to say he's not told you because he doesn't know. Not his fault people read so much into it.
Kitchandro Posted 14 June 2011 Posted 14 June 2011 fair point, he still could have worded it better though, it wasn't a direct reply.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.