RizLCFC Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 @SkySportsBrian: The deal for Jake Cassidy to Leicester is looking good, talks are believed to be going well. #lcfc 11 goals in 20 appearances for Tranmere this season, on loan from Wolves.
Ashley Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Not good enough for wolves not good for us This is so disrespectful. I can think of a few players who haven't been 'good enough' but gone on to better things.
Danny the Fox 95 Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Good record at Tranmere, hasn't had a chance to prove himself at Wolves, would be happy with this. Still think we need a proven goal scorer though.
MPH Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Not good enough for wolves not good for us Mark Davies wasn't in the wolves side either....
Danny the Fox 95 Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Not good enough for wolves not good for us What about Mark Davies? Was easily good enough to play for them
Mark_w Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Not good enough for wolves not good for us Jesus Christ.
FrankieADZ Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Mark Davies wasn't in the wolves side either.... That's true. Look what a gem he turned out to be for us. Just cos there not in there respective parent clubs first team don't mean there utter gob shite Sent from my JY-G3 using Tapatalk 2
Buggsteam Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 I said we should look to sign him a few weeks back in one of the threads. Seen him play a couple of times this season as my mates a Tranmere fan. Not the finished article yet but still a quality player and got a quality shot on him from range. Would be a good squad player at the mo and maybe progress but not the striker to get us up but would still play a part and would be happy if he signed.
Fox92 Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Don't really know much about him, so can't comment, but a decent record at Tranmere.
teblin Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Hume wasn't actually that bad for us. Wasn't that good either!
Happy Fox Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Can people look at who is tweeting info this guy is as believable as bullshit barry.
Bert Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Wasn't that good either! Still ended up as our top scorer most seasons he was here.
Corky Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Wasn't that good either! For the money we paid he was ok. Certainly better than some more expensive signings.
Deucalion Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 . Behind the scenes worker at Sky Sports News. Family man, Star Trek lover, and football fanatic. Lincolnshire.
dannythefox Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 We need someone whos going to hit the ground running imo we need to makesure he will do the job. Needs to be a proven champ/prem player.
MPH Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 Futacs is off and if we truly are after two strikers I would not be surprised if one of our others is off even if its just on loan. waggy seems to be preferred so that leaves vardy and schlupp. This is all totally guess work but I wondering if Pearson wants vardy to go get some games somewhere as he'll learn nothing sitting on the bench and I really don't think he is fully upto speed with championship football. Yet.
kingfox Posted 25 December 2012 Posted 25 December 2012 This guy only has 267 followers, so I wouldn't trust him just yet. Would take a punt on Cassidy, very good finisher, but i'm sure if he was so good Wolves would want to keep him.
Tuna Posted 26 December 2012 Posted 26 December 2012 Not good enough for wolves not good for us Spot on. We are trying to get in the premier league. I would be seriously concerened if this was the calibre of player we are looking at. Sort it out.
Happy Fox Posted 26 December 2012 Posted 26 December 2012 We aren't interested in him for FFS look at the twitter account he is about as believable as Side Show Bob.
Hack Posted 27 December 2012 Posted 27 December 2012 Futacs is off and if we truly are after two strikers I would not be surprised if one of our others is off even if its just on loan. waggy seems to be preferred so that leaves vardy and schlupp. This is all totally guess work but I wondering if Pearson wants vardy to go get some games somewhere as he'll learn nothing sitting on the bench and I really don't think he is fully upto speed with championship football. Yet. Clearly Schlupp is back up left back and not seen any longer as a striker, unless it is due to severe injury toll to our strikers. So we need to stop including him him in the striker pool. He hasn't played striker this year.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.