GingerrrFox Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 The 2nd team had more threat against a better side than this lot.
Tielemans63 Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 On the bright side I've found a 4 pack of Leffe in the garage fridge and a decent-looking fajita. All set for the second half.
ScouseFox Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 glenn hoddle "i want to put my balls into lallana" ian wright "barkley will get it"
Tielemans63 Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 Rooney's been so poor I'm coming round to the idea of leaving him out. He's now a streak player and he's not on a streak at the moment. Agree. Get Barkley on - makes things happen. Like Rooney did back when he was still good.
lgfualol Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 Watching England is not a good idea when you're half asleep but want to stay awake.
Charl91 Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 I don't know why people are only just realising that Rooney is shit. His injury vs. Bayern Munich in 2010 is when he started going downhill. Barkley has been more exciting in 2 minutes of coming on.
lgfualol Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 Brilliant shot... ten yards wide I did smile when the commentators were saying how much talent he used in the shot. If it was Rooney, they'd be like "fat willy puller"
Tielemans63 Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 I don't know if there's a British Bulldog world cup but if there is Honduras must be right up there.
Stadt Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 Watching England is not a good idea when you're half asleep but want to stay awake.It's like watching the football league show.Rooney is so slow, physically and everything he does whether it be a run, pass or shot is painstaking.
Vacamion Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 England appear to be a much better side with Barkley than with Wazza. We might have to think the unthinkable.
Charl91 Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 The only way Rooney should be playing is an out-and-out striker (he is terrible as a #10). And while I think he is a better striker of the ball than Sturridge, he doesn't have the pace or the dribbling ability that Sturridge does.
AKCJ Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 England appear to be a much better side with Barkley than with Wazza. We might have to think the unthinkable. It's more that with Barkley in the side you get someone who will link the midfield to the attack.
GingerrrFox Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 Roy doesn't have the bollocks to do it but not playing Gerrard and Rooney is the right thing to do. Barkley and Wilshere give us more fluidity, creativity and attacking threat. We will not beat Italy if we set up not to lose, we have to go and attack them.
Guest ttfn Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 Roy doesn't have the bollocks to do it but not playing Gerrard and Rooney is the right thing to do. Barkley and Wilshere give us more fluidity, creativity and attacking threat. We will not beat Italy if we set up not to lose, we have to go and attack them. Dropping Gerrard is madness.
Unabomber Posted 7 June 2014 Posted 7 June 2014 Man what are they doing, they should check this shit for match fixing.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.