Danny Ings

[Max Power]

Would be worth it for Dyche's reaction.

 

Wouldn't be worth it when they finish above us anyway.

[Stadt]

Somebody call for a David Fishwick minibus

[dayday]

Wouldn't it be funny if we signed Ings after Pearson slagged them off.they would be in meltdown

[Callabinho]

Don't be silly, why would he join the Leicester "pound notes" city?

[chapero82]

1 they would never sell to us 2, he would never come here

[Clever Fox]

It could be a smart signing if it happens. A good young England player on one hand and Fk Up Burnleys chances of staying up.

[BlackburnClaret]

Would be hilarious to see Dyche crying like a little bitch, but for the money we could probably do better.

Firstly, if there's one club we wouldn't sell to its you. Secondly, who would you get better at price?

[Sharpe's Fox]

They are in a better position that us to stay up ffs

[TheUltimateWinner]

I thought we were better than Burnley in every way?!

[VLC86]

I thought we were better than Burnley in every way?!

 

I bet he regrets that more than the **** off and die comment.

[BlackburnClaret]

I think Juke will be available.

[RizLCFC]

Did he mean on the day? Because I agree with him if that's the case.

[The Doctor]

Firstly, if there's one club we wouldn't sell to its you. Secondly, who would you get better at price?

No names immediately spring to mind, but given pelle went for £8m in the summer, £7.5m for Ings is ridiculous. Worth 4m at most.

[Corky]

Is it worth trying for Oscar Cardozo again?

[BlackburnClaret]

What did you pay for the far less prolific Ulloa?

[Guest ttfn]

What did you pay for the far less prolific Ulloa?

In what way is Ulloa (6 goals) "far less prolific" than Ings (4 goals)?

And to answer your question nicely, £8 million.

[BlackburnClaret]

At the time of you signing him, I meant.

So, if at the start of the season you had the choice of Ulloa and Ings, who would you have gone for? Honestly?

[Guest ttfn]

At the time of you signing him, I meant.

So, if at the start of the season you had the choice of Ulloa and Ings, who would you have gone for? Honestly?

I think I thought Ings was a better player but we needed Ulloa more.

[Frost]

That's not what you asked though.

[Soar Fox]

At the time of you signing him, I meant.

So, if at the start of the season you had the choice of Ulloa and Ings, who would you have gone for? Honestly?

Ings is the better goalscorer but we did need an Ulloa type of player.

I thought Vardy was just as good if not better than Ings. Unfortunately one of them has stepped and carried on scoring goals, the other one runs round like a headless chicken and doesn't even look threatening anymore.

[theessexfox]

I think Ings is pretty good, I'd take him but there's not a chance it'd happen now. 

[Guest Bilo]

One of the very few Burnley players who's better than anything we have at the moment. 

 

£7.5m would be a steal.

[Carl the Llama]

At the time of you signing him, I meant.

So, if at the start of the season you had the choice of Ulloa and Ings, who would you have gone for? Honestly?

Well Ulloa ended the season on strong form, whereas Ings looked like he'd lost it since his injury so you tell me.  In fact since his Injury he's scored 5  (1 every 343 minutes) to Ulloa's 11 (1 every 156) so I wouldn't be too quick to measure dicks buddy.

[Fosse93]

At the time of you signing him, I meant.

So, if at the start of the season you had the choice of Ulloa and Ings, who would you have gone for? Honestly?

I'd have gone for Ings.

[BlackburnClaret]

It's not just about the goals, he's intrumental in everything we do. He's head and shoulders above any striker you have at the moment, and will only get better with the imminent return of Vokes.