EnglishOxide Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 A name like Hiddink, with his credentials, would instantly have the respect of the squad, therefore this is a yes from me.
TMELcfc Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Why are people so negative about this? You'd seriously want Lennon bringing in bang average championship or Scottish Premiership players? Be like Craig Levin all over again!
benpicko Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 This has got Sven written all over it again. Well hopefully after Sven 2.0 we see Pearson 4.0
cullenfox Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Instinct tells me Hiddink would not be a good appointment. Need to look elsewhere. I would not support him if appointed.
woznotwos Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Doesnt have his own staff , no. He prefers a walking stick
TMELcfc Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 A name like Hiddink, with his credentials, would instantly have the respect of the squad, therefore this is a yes from me.And attract better players
shade Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Lovely, foreign players, foreign manager, foreign owners, were losing our identity now. This is a sad time. I am proud that out club has built a young squad that is mostly British and hungry for success. Wave goodbye to that approach if we appoint Hiddink. The only positive is Hiddink is kinda like Humpadink. schneichel, huth, was, schlupp, cambiasso, kram, ulloa etc etc
cc_star Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Where is all this Sven 2.0 bollocks coming from. Because they are both experienced and foreign? Sven wishes he had the cv of Hiddink. He will attract players and commands a great deal more respect than Sven. On top of that this isn't the championship which is notoriously harder for managers to adapt too.Take a look at his recent record, Russia, Turkey, Anzhi Makhachkala It's all about the €$£€$£ Hiddink is the very definition of Sven 2.0, under whom it never felt like 'my' club as mercenary after mercenary signed for a pay day rather than the club He's no Klopp, that's for sure - although as one of Europe's hottest properties we'll have no chance of attracting him
Stevosevic Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Lovely, foreign players, foreign manager, foreign owners, were losing our identity now. This is a sad time. I am proud that out club has built a young squad that is mostly British and hungry for success. Wave goodbye to that approach if we appoint Hiddink. The only positive is Hiddink is kinda like Humpadink. Think u need to check the nationalities of main eleven in the run in. Kasper, Huth, Was, Cambiasso,Schlupp, Mahrez, Ulloa, all foreign. Plus the rest of the squad.
Guest Lcfc82 Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 does he have his own staff?Wasn't van nistelrooy his number 2 with Holland ?
Steven Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 If not Hiddink, at least I like the thinking. Better than Lennon, Dyche, Cotterill et al.....
Frank to be Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Brilliant he waits all this time to give the job to someone who only just kept his team up and sent us down, then got the sack! what a cv that is. Who else applied for the post if this is the best we can get? I thought Pearson was more of a coach than a manager anyway, this club has lost the plot, Mandaric will probably sack him by christmas after we win 2 in a row. Milan is helping sub-standard managers get their homes paid off by signing them to contracts that are far too long but he knows best i guess, its only money. , just saying. Roll on the Hiddink wagon.
chicagofox Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Instinct tells me Hiddink would not be a good appointment. Need to look elsewhere. Well I was happy with this news but you've convinced me otherwise.
Number 6 Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 There is only one reason you go to manage Anzi. His contract alone would be insane money wise, then the transfer kitty too. Gut tells me this would end badly.
Matt Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Not too keen, would prefer someone younger and it's bringing back nightmares of Sven, however you can't really argue too much with his CV. But I'm not really sure who I want at the end of the day and not sure I'll be happy with anyone other than Pearson, but that's not gonna happen.
Vindaloo FOX Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 is this going to be spend stupid like Sven all over again, i hope not . no doubt he is a very good manager but he would be on a very high wage and not here for to long imo. I would rather like someone who would build something for the long term here like i was hoping NP would. oh well if its Guus then i hope he does well and buys wisely .
tom_kettering Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Instinct tells me Hiddink would not be a good appointment. Need to look elsewhere. I would not support him if appointed.
Guest kristianity77 Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Hiddink didn't too badly with Chelsea did he. Pretty sure he turned them around right off the bat after Scholari was sacked and nearly got them to the Champions League final. I know Chelsea is a different kettle of fish but it wasn't that long ago and he proved somewhat he has what it takes to hit the ground running in the prem. That alone, is good enough for me.
Bagworthblue Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Lovely, foreign players, foreign manager, foreign owners, were losing our identity now. This is a sad time. I am proud that out club has built a young squad that is mostly British and hungry for success. Wave goodbye to that approach if we appoint Hiddink. The only positive is Hiddink is kinda like Humpadink. Huth De Laet Mahrez Schlupp Kramaric Ulloa Cambiasso Fuchs Okazaki Wasilewski Knockaert (prior to departure) Schmeichel Morgan We kinda had loads of foreign players before now. And of the British players, 3 spring to mind that we can hardly be proud of. Take your point but Think your comment is a good few years too late. We've been foreign owned for years and our previous manager was also foreign
Happy Fox Posted 2 July 2015 Author Posted 2 July 2015 Hiddink didn't too badly with Chelsea did he. Pretty sure he turned them around right off the bat after Scholari was sacked and nearly got them to the Champions League final. I know Chelsea is a different kettle of fish but it wasn't that long ago and he proved somewhat he has what it takes to hit the ground running in the prem. That alone, is good enough for me. 73 win percent ratio at Chelsea no bad.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 2 July 2015 Posted 2 July 2015 Would be great, has pulling power and fantastic experience. Anyone thinking he is poor, well for a club like us he would be fantastic we aren't in the champions league yet...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.